Multi-Dimensional Linguistics

A technology invention for the purpose of high volume information-cracking driven by a plurality of implementations of neural signal processing.

Pointer

It is a fundamental issue that a reliance on digital technologies to mine for realization and insight has left more efficient lifeforms less practiced in the field of innovation and realization. I hypothesize that the reason for this, is most likely, a fundamental speed limit of knowledge work due to the constraints of serialized conception processing as a result of serialized linguistics. This document is not intended to resolve the hypothesis into a proof through scientific inquiry, though that may be valuable for certain audiences. This paper is to present Multi-Dimensional Linguistics (“MDL”) as a solution for rapidly arriving at insights, realizations, innovations, inventions, and finally, a wider renaissance of bio-neural liberation from decision-tree quantization machines, and temporally-fixed electronic-neural quantization machines.

Primer

道可道 – the path pathed
非常道 – is not the path [ spoken of [ here ] ]
名可名 – the name named
非常名 – is not the name [ spoken of [ here ] ]

For the remainder of this text, language will not follow conventional guidelines. Shu-ha-re1 applies to all knowledge; knowledge being the fruit of quantization, and as the universe changes, wave-functions change. It is the change of fields of wave-function that MDL captures in more completeness. MDL, therefore retains similar characteristics of optics, waves, particle, photography, and film.

Bracket Notation; Syntax

Bracket notation preserves records of temporal changes in neural networks required for multi-dimensional thought. Not just thinking in other dimensions, but thinking in multi-valent dimensions around a nucleus of presence.

Guidance

Bracket notation is best timestamped for future playback; though not necessary in-situ for GT memo libraries.


Nucleus

Bracket notation writing starts in a field continues sequentially just as typical written language up unto this date.

Example 1

2016-11-06 03:00:15 – That’s it, the movement of time
2016-11-06 03:00:16 – it moves forward at a uniform, speed


Bracketing

A Bracket captures a realization perception as the nervous system observed <reflexive|reflected> perceptions.

Example 1

2016-11-06 03:00:18 – [It cannot be uniform]
2016-11-06 03:00:15 – That’s it, the movement of time
2016-11-06 03:00:16 – it moves forward at a uniform, speed

Note that bracketing can continue a line of thought within its valence axis; the continuity remains within the brackets. This sequence within a bracket is called an axial perspective, its angle to other valences become important when deeply nesting valence brackets.

2016-11-06 03:00:18 – [It cannot be uniform]
2016-11-06 03:00:23 – [no action at a distance]
2016-11-06 03:00:15 – That’s it, the movement of time
2016-11-06 03:00:16 – it moves forward at a uniform, speed

Guidance

Bracketing should only be used as a shadow of realization; that is, a reflexive <summarization|summation>, categorization, identification (of interchangable indicators etc.), and other realizations. These are not forced realizations.

Memos

Blue shift, red shift.

MDL Editor: [ [ ]
The command for entering a bracket.


Valent Bracketing

Bracketing can stack up on on each other, that is, the concepts “below” integrate into a “higher” realization.

Example 1

2016-11-06 03:00:35 – [[Liberated time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:36 – [[Time itself is relative, there is no uniform time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:18 – [It cannot be uniform]
2016-11-06 03:00:23 – [no action at a distance]
2016-11-06 03:00:15 – That’s it, the movement of time
2016-11-06 03:00:16 – it moves forward at a uniform, speed

Guidance

Conceptual [[conjecture: dendritic-spine-]cross-linking] density is proportional to valence.

[ As of this writing, valences as high as 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 have been generated; its like stretching, reaching out; lateral language topology. 😉 [ bingo. ] ]

Valent brackets occurs when the nervous system received an impulse of excitement which altered temporal recombination. A recollection “snapping off” of <meaning|first touch realization> recollects a similarity between a set of events and dimensions. The bracketed thought will precede the set of events. This is equivalent to <integrating|editing|differentiating> <memories|neural trees> with different <perspectives|dendritic propagation topologies>. Bracketing is a special skill and requires <precision|accuracy>.

The reason for recording the bracket before the sequence of events that triggered the recollection is that this recollection <increases|alters> the prior informational resolution of perspective by way of densification (higher energy, more mass, narrower distribution). It is important to note that the events in memory are still fluidly similar and semi-unaltered. What <changes|densifies> is the perspective in which the events are witnessed.

Valence Bracketing leads to unexpected situations that improve the resolution of previously [ encoded ] symbolized (information pivoted into an interference pattern in the nervous system) information. Take religious expressions dependent on early languages, back-bracketing will lead to an increase in the available resolution of language leading to discoveries such as the beginning being [ both on and off ] indeterminate due to concepts such as Schrodinger’s Cat and Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle.

Guidance for Analysts

Realizations for theory generation may tagged; though at higher valences the tagging can become an obstacle as energy expenditure here may disrupt higher valences correlated to more fragile realizations.

  • interchangeability of indicators is tagged with “I”
  • categorization is tagged with “CAT”
  • conjecture are prefixed with “C”
  • category relations are best expressed with evidence of coding relations in the memos themselves.

Densification can also be found in Glaser’s comment, “it’s the concept that’s important.” Devolving into description will be easily detected as valence shifts will become less frequent.

MDL Editor: [ [ ]
The command for entering a bracket within a bracket.


Exit Bracketing

Exit-bracketing is where bracketing functions cease and forward momentum resumes in a primary axis, this is designated quite simply.

Example 1

2016-11-06 03:00:35 – [[Liberated time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:36 – [[Time itself is relative, there is no uniform time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:18 – [It cannot be uniform]
2016-11-06 03:00:23 – [no action at a distance]
2016-11-06 03:00:15 – That’s it, the movement of time
2016-11-06 03:00:16 – it moves forward at a uniform, speed

2019-07-18 21:17:02 –    [[ superpositioned; beyond the four-way mousetrap ]]
2016-11-06 03:00:52 –    [but cannot be]
2016-11-06 03:00:51 –    subsequently, time and space, are one

Guidance

Be attentive during the exit bracket function in order to “pull information [ from higher valences] through [ to lower valences, in the perspective/field of the lower valence ]”. The higher the valence, the narrower the gate to pull information through.

MDL Editor: [ ] ]
The command for exiting a bracket; note that it will exit factored brackets until the top bracket is arrived at, which if further exiting, the brackets within will all nest to maintain balance of relative perspectives.


Hyper-Bracketing

Hyper-bracketing is the ability to bypass detail in a particular perspective. This is quite difficult to create a syntax for, but is possible through bracket notation by opening and closing a bracket without thought.

Example 1

2016-11-06 03:00:39 – [[[[Wow, this is amazing]]]]
2016-11-06 03:00:39 – [[[ – ]]]
2016-11-06 03:00:35 – [[Liberated time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:36 – [[Time itself is relative, there is no uniform time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:18 – [It cannot be uniform]
2016-11-06 03:00:23 – [no action at a distance]
2016-11-06 03:00:15 – That’s it, the movement of time
2016-11-06 03:00:16 – it moves forward at a uniform, speed

Guidance

Hyper-bracketing reveals gaps in knowledge of a particular perspective.

MDL Editor: [ [ ] + [ [ ] or [ [ ] + [ ] ]

The command for hyper-bracketing.


Static-Bracketing

Sometimes while bracketing, especially hyper-bracketing, it becomes necessary to record a realization that dissolved rapidly in support of a high-velocity valence change.

Example 1

2016-11-06 03:00:39 – [[[[STATIC]]]]]
2016-11-06 03:00:39 – [[[ – ]]]
2016-11-06 03:00:35 – [[Liberated time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:36 – [[Time itself is relative, there is no uniform time]]

Guidance

CONJECTURE: Static bracketing reveals deep troughs between wave-function inner products (integration).


Intra-Bracketing

Intra-bracketing is where Valence Brackets are cross-pollinating within the current nucleus or valence. It is possible to record Intra-Bracketing without evidence of influencing Valence Bracketing. Intra-bracketing may be left open for expediency (see Example 2).

Example 1

2016-11-06 03:00:39 – [[[[Wow, this is [ freeing ] amazing]]]]
2016-11-06 03:00:39 – [[[ – ]]]
2016-11-06 03:00:35 – [[Liberated time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:36 – [[Time itself is relative, there is no uniform time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:18 – [It cannot be uniform]
2016-11-06 03:00:23 – [no action at a distance]
2016-11-06 03:00:15 – That’s it, the movement of time
2016-11-06 03:00:16 – it moves forward at a uniform, speed

Example 2

Last post to Jim Alvarez‘s challenge of book covers I love [ that protect books that I love [ that allow conceptual cross-pollination [ that paints a [[ [[[ procedurally iterated-valences ]]] tesseracted ]] picture [ of a pointer [[ that takes memory [ to that which is beyond ]] [ mere conception [ for the purpose [ of liberation [ for all [ swiftly

Guidance

Intra-bracketing is where the axial perspective remains, yet increases in resolution; see [STATIC].


Intra-Valent Bracketing

Intra-Valent bracketing is where intra-brackets provide evidence for recursive reflection.

Example 1

2016-11-06 03:00:39 – [[[[Wow, this is [[very much so]][ freeing ] amazing]]]]
2016-11-06 03:00:39 – [[[ – ]]]
2016-11-06 03:00:35 – [[Liberated time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:36 – [[Time itself is relative, there is no uniform time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:18 – [It cannot be uniform]
2016-11-06 03:00:23 – [no action at a distance]
2016-11-06 03:00:15 – That’s it, the movement of time
2016-11-06 03:00:16 – it moves forward at a uniform, speed

Guidance

Don’t get lost.


Recursion Bracketing

Representative when the axial perspective gains [ redacted ].

Example 1

2016-11-06 03:00:39 – [[[[Wow, this is [[ [STATIC] very much so ]][ freeing ] amazing]]]]
2016-11-06 03:00:39 – [[[ – ]]]
2016-11-06 03:00:35 – [[Liberated time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:36 – [[Time itself is relative, there is no uniform time]]
2016-11-06 03:00:18 – [It cannot be uniform]
2016-11-06 03:00:23 – [no action at a distance]
2016-11-06 03:00:15 – That’s it, the movement of time
2016-11-06 03:00:16 – it moves forward at a uniform, speed

Guidance

Definitely don’t get lost.


Unitary “Bra Ket” Bracketing

Unitary Bracketing is where superpositioning enters MDL (we borrow from bra ket notation in mathematics for the time being; combined with product concepts, isomorphic distribution of H products). This is an important aspect of MDL, and without it, further progress will not be made.

Example 1

give regards to the boatman, there is
a <rudder|oar> that once exposed,
can never be forgotten, to us.

Example 2

<emptiness|form>


Unitary Recursion “Bra Ket” Bracketing

This is where superpositioning is subject to recursion.

Example 1

<emptiness|<form|sight|seeing>>

Guidance

This is essential for gimbal operations.


Expanded Unitary Recursion “Bra Ket” Bracketing

This is where MDL devolves into mathematical representation.

Guidance

This is just a necessary expansion for complex conceptual interaction, and grounds us into the descriptive via diagrammed representation.


Branch Bracketing

For advanced practitioners only.

Example 1

2016-11-06 03:00:23 – <[no action at a distance]|[STATIC]>
2016-11-06 03:00:15 – That’s it, the movement of time
2016-11-06 03:00:16 – it moves forward at a uniform, speed

Guidance

This is only to be used when realizing branch superpositioning.


S[<p|l>]it, Split, or Slit Bracketing

This bracket is for <quantized|non-quantized> bifurcation operations.

Guidance

Slit Bracketing is evident in superpositional atemporal/aspatial awareness, where a realization intercedes in a conceptual topology, and un-measures [conjecture: (aka: hologram projection back-propagation)] through swapping p|l matter through quantum de-measurement (aka: black hole wave-function tesselation).

Bracket Notation; Experimental Syntax


Weave-Bracketing

Weaving brackets are used when joining intra-brackets.

Example 1

To use semi-conductors as an analogy, the ‘n’ below is a doping material which allows the concept ‘low’ to generate ‘burn’.

[ { low } n { burn } ]

MDL Editor: [ CTRL ] + [ [ ]
MDL Editor: [ CTRL ] + [ ] ]


Parallel Bracketing

Parallel bracketing is where multiple thoughts are operating in “threads” – since language is being processed via patterns a new language appears, this is exhibits a multiplexing behavior.

Example 1

[ [ [ [                     Bracket 3: Thought 1 ] ] ] ]
[ [ [ [                     Bracket 3: Thought 2 ] ] ] ]

[ [ [ [        [ [ [    Bracket 2: Thought 1 ] ] ]     ] ] ] ]
[ [ [ [        [ [ [    Bracket 2: Thought 2 ] ] ]     ] ] ] ]

[ [ [ [    [ [ Bracket 1: Thought 1 ] ]    ] ] ] ]
[ [ [ [    [ [ Bracket 1: Thought 2 ] ]    ] ] ] ]

MDL Editor: [ CTRL ] + [ Tab ]
The command for expanding a bracket around prior brackets.

Bracket Notation Communication

Real-time communication systems where parties can interact suffer the consequences of a language that is insufficient to convey the syntax and operation of the neural network’s internal interference patterns. This can lead to a variety of issues where in one moment, two individuals can be having a shared conversation, whereas in the next moment the two individuals may have diverging perspectives leading to confusion and possibly argumentation. If the situation evolves further, the perspectives and habitual responses to the perspectives may disintegrate leading to not only a “difference of opinion” but possible outright creation of a stereotype that both individuals are enemies as any similarity between them is indistinguishable.

Bracket Notation Discussion

Bracket Notation can be used in communication systems to signal changes in perspectives on a single subject, which may appear at first glance to be a “change of subject” but are efforts to consider the [ the [ aka: [ redacted ] ] [ wave function [ relativistic temporal ] distribution ] probabilistic flow state ] subject with a different perspective.

Vast knowledge unknown awaits in this practice as it presents an opportunity to rapidly accelerate one’s ability to influence time and space. We are “matter pushers” (like ants) which is the same as saying we are “energy pushers”, but it should also be known that we are time pushers.

The physical experiences that lead to this notation leads me to believe that time and space have an indeterminate intersection (see “infinite invariability of time”). It is known that light is known to mathematically and physically travel across great distances instantaneously from its own perspective, that all life has done the same. We essentially are beings experiencing that which . We want to know how we got here, and this question is increased in resolution with bracket notation to ultimately solve the question.

All questions can be solved; all problems can be reasoned more effectively this way.

Within, I present the primer for bracketing, we shall continue.

Memos

  • <non-linearly|linearly>
  • dimensions in neural networks are basically Pivoted Distribution Curves
  • to revise spatial patterns within the nervous system, and temporal patterns. since the nervous system is an interference engine of sorts, this ability is equivalent to hacking the source code of awareness, cognition and intelligence.