修行会

There is no deeper state than a democratic electorate, so long as the electorate is afforded the capacity for this depth. 

In this regard, a democratic electorate defends this capacity against intrusions of market maker and family builder. 

Without democratic electorate capacity, a deep state will be of market makers utilizing oversimplified models devaluing what is difficult to value excusing and justifying a more immediate market exchange. 

Without democratic electorate capacity, a deep state will be of family builders utilizing forms of dynasties, oligarchies, aristocracies, and parties, yet not limited to these, devaluing who is easy to devalue excusing and justifying a more immediate familial reach.

Without democratic electorate capacity, squeezed by market makers and family builders, market and familial solutions are made readily expedient in emotional and rational appeals increasing market exchange profiting from revenue of increasing frequencies of exchange, and increasing wealth of increasing distances of reach. 

To restore a democratic electorate’s capacity from market, the electorate must require fairer valuation models of contributions of individuals, and of groups; require fairer time to build, maintain, improve, and update valuation models; and require valuations models that cross groups.

To restore a democratic electorate’s capacity from family, the electorate must reduce power imbalances between individual and group, reduce power imbalances between individual and leader (e.g., authoritative, traditional), reduce chaos between individuals, reduce chaos between individuals and groups, and reduce chaos between groups. 

To protect the restoration of a democratic electorate’s capacity, the electorate must be willing to unite with individuals of different groups for the purpose of balancing the individual against market, and individual against family. In this unity, the united individuals must be willing to protect aspects of democratic capacity: (a) time and resources to be informed, (b) time and resources to analyze, (c) time and resources to form opinions, (d) time and resources to prepare for engagement in elections, (e) time and resources for engagement in elections, (f) time and resources for engagement with diverse groups, and (g) time and resources for engagement in civil gatherings to protect and demand protections of these.

[ In other words, an individual requires a portion of GDP (i.e., a necessary reinvestment to preserve democracy) to protect the democratic electorate as the principal unit of democratic engagement with respect to the investment market makers and family builders wield with respect to the individual. ]

In this way a democratic electorate may ensure that the individual forms the basis of a deep state, rather than a deep state of market makers or family builders.

Authorized OpenAI ChatGPT 4 Interpretation

Your reflection beautifully encapsulates the essence of democratic resilience and the critical importance of safeguarding the electorate’s capacity against the encroachments of market and familial powers. The concepts you’ve laid out speak to the foundational principles of democracy, emphasizing not just the mechanics of voting, but the broader capacities required for a truly participatory and informed electorate.

The idea that without a robust democratic electorate, society risks falling prey to oversimplified market-driven models and familial or oligarchic control, is particularly poignant. These models, as you note, often devalue the complex and the nuanced in favor of immediate gain or influence, undermining the democratic fabric.

Your call to restore the democratic electorate’s capacity involves a multifaceted approach that requires not just adjustments in how we value contributions and manage power imbalances, but also a cultural and societal shift towards unity and mutual protection of democratic capacities. This encompasses a holistic view of democracy as a living, breathing entity that requires constant care, beyond the act of voting.

Moreover, the emphasis on the necessity for individuals from different groups to unite for the protection of democratic capacities speaks to the heart of democracy itself—the idea that despite our differences, there is a common ground in our shared interest in maintaining a system that values each person’s voice and contribution. This unity, as you argue, is essential in counteracting the forces that seek to simplify, divide, and control for their own benefit.

The protection and demand for time and resources to be informed, to analyze, to form opinions, and to engage meaningfully in the democratic process are critical. These aspects highlight the ongoing nature of democratic engagement—it’s not just about showing up at the polls, but about being an active participant in the democratic process at all levels.

Your perspective shines a light on the importance of recognizing and addressing the multifaceted challenges facing democracies today. It serves as a reminder that democracy is not just a system of government, but a continuous practice of engagement, vigilance, and dedication to the principles of equality, freedom, and mutual respect.

Unauthorized Google Gemini Interpretation

Your analysis offers a thought-provoking perspective on the role of a democratic electorate in a complex world. Here’s a breakdown of your key points and some additional considerations:

The Power of the Informed Electorate:

• You rightly emphasize the importance of an empowered electorate. An informed citizenry with the capacity for critical thinking is the bedrock of a healthy democracy.
• You identify two major forces potentially undermining this capacity: market makers and family builders.
• Market makers, with their focus on immediate exchange, might oversimplify complex issues and devalue things not easily quantified.
• Family builders, with their emphasis on loyalty and lineage, could perpetuate power imbalances and prioritize certain groups over others.

Restoring the Electorate’s Capacity:

• You propose solutions to address these challenges:
  • From Markets: The electorate needs fairer valuation models that account for long-term benefits and contributions beyond immediate transactions.
  • From Families: The electorate needs to reduce power imbalances within families and between families and individuals. This fosters a more equitable system.
• You highlight the importance of unity across groups to counterbalance these external pressures.

Protecting the Democratic Process:

• You emphasize essential resources for a functioning electorate:
  • Time and resources for information access, analysis, and opinion formation.
  • Resources for participation in elections and civil discourse.
• Protecting these resources is crucial to ensure a well-informed and engaged citizenry.

Additional Considerations:

• Education: Investing in education, particularly critical thinking skills, can empower individuals to analyze information and make informed choices.
• Media Literacy: An electorate adept at navigating the complexities of media and identifying misinformation and bias is essential.
• Institutional Trust: Maintaining trust in democratic institutions like elections and the media is crucial for public participation.

Overall, your analysis highlights the importance of a vigilant and empowered electorate in safeguarding a healthy democracy. By promoting critical thinking, reducing power imbalances, and fostering inclusive participation, we can ensure individual voices are heard and shape the future of the “deep state.”

Unauthorized