植芝盛平之道歌技術者版–115: Scholarship, Martiality, and Keiko

115「古より文武の道は両輪と稽古の徳に身魂悟りぬ。」- 植芝盛平

Original Waka

古より
文武の道は
両輪と
稽古の徳に
身魂悟りぬ
植芝盛平 (Ueshiba, 1977)

Translation

“Since ancient times, the way of scholarship and martiality has been like the two wheels of a cart. Through the virtue of keiko, body and spirit awakened.“ – Ueshiba Morihei

Waka Translation

From the ancient times
on letters’ and arms‘ own way;
two wheels of cart, like—

keiko’s virtues merits, through
body-spirit awakened.

Ueshiba Morihei

文語補読・旧字体（語構成を明示）

古きより（ふるきより）
文武の道は（ぶんぶのみちは）
兩輪と（りょうりんと）
稽古の德に（けいこのとくに）
身魂悟りぬ（みたまさとりぬ）

植芝盛平

Bungo Romanization

furuki yori
bunbu no michi wa
ryōrin to
keiko no toku ni
mitama satorinu

Ueshiba Morihei

Notes

Translation, Notes, Commentary, and Research by Latex G. N. R. Space-Coyote

Ueshiba, M. (2025). 植芝盛平之道歌技術者版–115: Scholarship, martiality, and keiko (L. G. N. R. Space-Coyote, Trans.; OpenAI ChatGPT-5 Pro, Ed.). Shugyokai.org. https://shugyokai.org/v8bi (Original work compiled 1977)

古き（ふるき; furuki）— attributive (連体形) of classical adjective 古し “old / ancient”.

より（yori）— case particle “from, since”.

古きより（ふるきより; furuki yori）— “from olden / ancient times”; signals appeal to antiquity and tradition—standard rhetorical move in waka and in bushidō / bunbu discourse to authorize a teaching by anchoring it in the “ancient way”.

武（ぶ; bu）— martial; military force or martial practice. The traditional ethical gloss 止戈為武 interprets 武 as “stopping the spear,” but this is an exegetical interpretation rather than the character’s historical graphic formation, which joins 止, “to advance / a footstep,” with 戈, “halberd.”

文武（ぶんぶ; bunbu）— “letters and arms” evokes the classical ideal 文武両道 (bunbu ryōdō; “the two ways of letters and arms”), the balanced cultivation of learning (bun; letters and scholarship) and martial practice (bu; arms and martiality); twin paths of pen and sword; joins Confucian ideals of scholarly learning and martial prowess; in samurai tradition, an accomplished warrior was expected to excel at both. Edo‑period education often framed them as 車の両輪 (“the two wheels of a cart”) and the more expanded proverb “文武は車の両輪” (“letters and arms are the two wheels of a cart”), a metaphor Ueshiba echoes with 両輪 (see below).

の（no）— genitive / linking particle “of”.

道（michi）— way, path, discipline.

は（wa）— topic marker.

文武の道は（ぶんぶのみちは; bunbu no michi wa）— “the Way of letters and arms”; bunbu pairs scholarship / letters (bun) and martial prowess (bu), a long‑standing samurai ideal sometimes named bunbu ryōdō (“the two ways of letteredness and martiality”), where both are essential to a complete person.

両輪（りょうりん; ryōrin）— literally, “a pair of wheels”; here, a metaphor for the mutually supporting cultivation of scholarship and martial practice.

と（to）— quotative/comparative particle “as, like, in the role of”.

両輪と (りょうりんと; ryōrin to) — “as [if they were] two wheels [of a cart]”; the comparative “X と” as / like is standard in bungo (particle と); classic metaphor as two wheels must both turn for the vehicle to move straight; lacking either scholarship or martial cultivation unbalances the path. Modern Japanese still uses ryōrin metaphorically for paired, mutually supporting elements. Kakekotoba-like resonance: りょう can be 両 “two”, 良 “good”, 霊 “numinous/spiritual” and りん can be 輪 “wheel, ring”, 倫 “moral order, ethics” (as in 倫理 rinri) leaving (a) 両輪 – the explicit “two wheels” of the proverb, (b) 良輪 – “good / well-balanced wheels”, (c) 霊輪 – “spirit-wheel” (a very Ōmoto‑ish, esoteric overlay), 両倫 – “twofold ethics” (civil and martial) for carrying not only the physical cart metaphor but also ethical (倫) and spiritual (霊) overtones that link naturally to 徳 and 身魂 in the lower half of the poem.

稽古 (けいこ; keiko) — “training, disciplined practice”; etymologically “to think about the old”, linking practice to reflection on tradition; more than “practice”; 稽 has the sense “to look back / consider”; literally means “to consider the old,” i.e., disciplined training grounded in tradition. Rendering it as keiko (rather than “training” alone) preserves this cultural depth.

徳（とく; toku）— “virtue, merit” (incl. religious / moral “benefit”); is moral efficacy / virtue (Confucian 徳, Neo-Confucian idiom), the cultivated quality through training that makes practice transformative rather than merely technical; the sound toku may secondarily evoke (a) 得, “gain or benefit,” (b) 解く, “to untie, loosen, or solve,” and (c) 説く, “to explain or expound.” Only 徳, however, is lexically and syntactically active in keiko no toku ni (稽古の徳に). The alternatives are therefore not simultaneous readings of the line, but a creative cluster of homophonic associations gathering practical, loosening, and explanatory overtones around its explicit ethical-spiritual sense.

稽古の徳（けいこのとく; keiko no toku）— implies reflective, moral, and spiritual cultivation, where toku (virtue) alludes to the character-building aspect of disciplined practice.

に（ni）— case particle; here instrumental or locative: “through, in”.

稽古の徳に（けいこのとくに; keiko no toku ni）“through the virtue / merit of keiko”; keiko in budō isn’t just “drilling techniques”; its characters 稽 (“to consider, ponder”) and 古 (“old”) point to “reflecting on the old,” i.e., deeply internalizing a living tradition; 徳 (toku) shades toward both ethical virtue and spiritual “merit” (as in Buddhist and Shintō contexts), so keiko no toku reads as the transformative moral‑spiritual power accumulated in practice.

身（み; mi）— body (originally a pregnant woman).

魂（たま; tama）— spirit, soul, or vital-spiritual presence. The character is a phono-semantic compound formed from 鬼 and the phonetic element 云. In 身魂, it is joined with 身 to express the embodied-spiritual whole; in Chinese hun–po cosmology, spirit [which goes to heaven, ascending as opposed to 魄 which descends to earth]; spirit; mood; lofty spirit of nation or people (云 – to say, rain[, cloud]; 鬼 – man with ugly face, tail; overawe, terrorize, to return, to deceive; peculiar).

身魂（みたま; mitama）— literally “body‑soul”; in Ueshiba’s Shintō-colored vocabulary, this signals the unity of body and spirit and their “polishing” (cf. mitama-migaki); resonant with mitama discourse (e.g., ara‑mitama / nigi‑mitama polarity and mitama‑migaki, “polishing the spirit”); I render it as “body and spirit” to keep the holistic sense.

悟り（さとり; satori）— noun from verb 悟る “to awaken, to realize”; In bungo syntax here it functions as 連用形 “悟り” + auxiliary.

ぬ（nu）— classical perfective auxiliary (not the modern negative!), marking completion: “has indeed awakened”;

悟りぬ（さとりぬ; satori‑nu）— verb stem + ぬ (完了の助動詞), the classical perfective marking completion / attainment (“has awakened / realized”).

身魂悟りぬ（みたまさとりぬ; mitama satori-nu）— “body‑spirit has awakened”; blends bodily and spiritual enlightenment; mitama fuses “body” and “spirit,” echoing Shintō notions of ichirei shikon (one spirit, four spirits) and of mitama as an integrated yet multi‑aspect spirit; the perfective ‑nu presents awakening as accomplished fact: not mere aspiration but realized unity of embodied practice and spiritual insight—consistent with Ueshiba’s presentation of aikidō as a religiously consummative practice.

Classical morphology. The reading furuki yori (古〈き〉より) supplies the attributive ending -ki as an editorial bungo reconstruction, yielding a quasi-nominal expression understood as “from ancient times.” The supplied syllable also restores a five-mora opening.

Orthography. Kyūjitai like 兩, 德 and historical kana values (e.g., ryō historically written with りょう ← りやう) are consistent with pre‑reform conventions (see the history of Japanese writing / orthography).

Register. Lexemes like 徳, figurative 両輪, and gnomic diction cue the didactic / aphoristic tone common in waka‑like moral statements. Standard literary handbooks describe this meter and diction.

Bunbu ryōdō (文武両道). The balanced cultivation of scholarship (bun) and martial practice (bu) has been an ideal in Japanese elite culture; modern discourse about bushidō and “balance” often frames them as complementary “two wheels.” Ueshiba’s 両輪 literally voices that metaphor. For broader intellectual history around bunbu and bushidō as a modern revival / reframing, see Benesch.

Keiko and embodied virtue. Keiko connotes reflective, tradition‑conscious practice (not mere repetition), tying to Confucian 徳 as cultivated efficacy. This fits Ueshiba’s pedagogy that ethical self‑cultivation is integral to budō.

Mitama and awakening. Ueshiba’s Shintō inflection—shaped by his involvement with Ōmoto and Onisaburō Deguchi—colors terms like 身魂 and his soteriological language (purification, polishing the spirit). On Ōmoto’s influence and Ueshiba’s religiosity, see Stalker and studies of aikidō’s religious genealogy; for mitama polarity (ara / nigi) see the Kokugakuin Encyclopedia of Shintō.

Translation note. The poetic translation approximates the poem’s 5–7–5–7–7 movement in English syllables rather than reproducing Japanese morae directly. Its lineation retains the kami-no-ku / shimo-no-ku fold after the third line, while “awakened” conveys the completed attainment expressed by the perfective auxiliary nu (ぬ).

Homophonic and graphic after-resonance. The sound of ryōrin may secondarily call to mind graphs such as 良, 霊, or 倫, allowing ethical and spiritual overtones to gather around the explicit image of 両輪, “two wheels.” These alternatives are not simultaneous grammatical readings of the line, however. They are best treated as creative homophonic or orthographic associations—a kakekotoba-like after-resonance—rather than as a strict classical kakekotoba.

Mitama: homophonic and orthographic resonance. The explicit form 身魂 joins body and spirit as a single embodied-spiritual whole. Its sound may also evoke 御霊 or 御魂, mitama, “august spirit,” adding a secondary Shintō-numinous overtone to the line. Other graphic substitutions, such as 実魂, belong to a more speculative or creative associative layer and should not be presented as simultaneous grammatical readings. The effect is therefore best described as homophonic and orthographic after-resonance rather than as a strict kakekotoba.

A note on nu (ぬ). In satorinu (悟りぬ), satori (悟り) is the continuative form, ren’yōkei (連用形), of the ra-row quadrigrade verb satoru (悟る), and nu (ぬ) is the classical perfective auxiliary. The form therefore means “awakened,” “came to realization,” or “has indeed awakened.” A negative construction would require the irrealis form satoranu (悟らぬ), formed from satora- (悟ら‐) and the attributive negative auxiliary nu (ぬ). The two forms are distinct even in kana—さとりぬ and さとらぬ—so no grammatical or homophonic negative reading is active here. The line’s yoin (余韻) arises from the decisive completion of awakening and the resonance that continues after that completion, not from ambiguity between affirmation and negation.

Yoin. Ending on satorinu (悟りぬ) gives the awakening the grammatical force of accomplished attainment, while its implications continue to resonate beyond the final line. The poem presents awakening as the fruit of sustained keiko extending from the ancient, rather than as an abstract aspiration left unrealized.

Shugyokai note. If both wheels are sized differently, the cart turns in circles.

解説

このページの第115首「古より／文武の道は／両輪と／稽古の徳に／身魂悟りぬ」は、まず上三句で――「大昔から、学問（文）と武の道（武）は、車の“両輪”のようなものだ」――と、いわゆる「文武両道」をそのまま歌っています。注で触れられているように、文武の道は「学び（letters, scholarship）」と「武の実践（martiality）」を対立させるのではなく、片方だけでは車がまっすぐ進めない“二つでひとつ”の車輪だ、という比喩です。そこから「稽古の徳に／身魂悟りぬ」と続けるとき、稽古は単なる反復練習ではなく、字義どおり「古（いにしえ）を稽える」行です。このページの読みでは、その「古」はさらに、これら獣の身体に宿る古き道へと開かれます。その中で積み上がる徳＝倫理的・霊的な熟成の力を通して、「身魂（からだと魂）」が悟りぬ――完了助動詞ぬで「たしかに目を覚ました」のニュアンス――と読み込める、とページの文法ノートは教えてくれます。

これを植芝盛平の六つのプライマーに糸戻しすると、構図がすっと浮かびます。プライマーの第一原理〈武＝宇宙原理〉が示した“武の理”は、ここでは「武（bu）だけが前に暴走しないように、文（bun）＝学びと言葉の車輪が同じだけ回り続ける」という形で具体化し、プライマーの第二原理〈神や人との合気〉は、その文武両輪を対神や人の関係と場づくりに使う入口になります。プライマーの第三原理〈心魂一如〉は、文＝頭／武＝身体をバラバラにせず、学んだことがそのまま手足のふるまいに現れ、ふるまいが学びを深める循環を支える芯であり、プライマーの第四原理〈和合美化〉は、文で世界を切り刻むのでなく、武で殴り倒すのでなく、「両輪」で世界を和と美に運ぶ方向を定めます。プライマーの第五原理〈体＝道場、心＝修業者／修行者／学び手〉は、まさに稽古の徳の部分――日々の稽古が「身魂悟りぬ」を支える畑であり、プライマーの第六原理〈「至愛」の源に順う〉は、文でも武でも「何のために？」と問うときの最上位の測りです（このページの参考文献群も、文武観や稽古／德／身魂の歴史的コンテクストを丁寧に押さえています）。

直近の三首とも自然につながります。第112首は「いきいのち廻り栄ゆる世の仕組たまの合気は天の浮橋」で、「息と命の循環」そのものが世界の仕組であり、“たまの合気”がその中で橋（浮橋）として働くと歌いました。第113首は「一霊の元の御親御姿は響き光りてぞ生れし言霊」で、一霊の御親の御姿が響き・光るところから言霊が生まれると、文（ことば）の源泉を宇宙論レベルで示し、第114首は「伊都のをのこり霊はらう伊都魂を光の中にたける雄武び」で、こびりついた“こり霊”を祓い、厳の魂を光に据え直してから初めて、武の雄叫びが正しく立つと描きました。そこを踏まえると第115首は、「文（学び・言霊）と武（からだ・雄武び）が、無限に広がる十字道＝フィールド全体の“両輪”として回り続け、そのなかで行われる稽古の徳によって、身魂がたしかに目を覚ます」と総括しているとも読めます。十字道は一点の記号ではなく、天地タテ軸と四方ヨコ軸が無限に交差する場そのものだったことを思い出すと、文武両輪もまたその無限の場をころがす二つの輪であり、そこを走り続ける日々の稽古こそが「身魂悟りぬ」のリアルなエンジンなのだ、と腑に落ちてきます。

口語要約のひとこと

「大昔から、文と武の道は車の両輪のようなもので、稽古の徳によって身も魂も目を覚ますのだ。」

補説――「両輪」を歌の骨法にする

この首でなお拾っておきたい第一の仕掛けは、「両輪」が内容上の比喩にとどまらず、一首の組み方そのものへ移されている点です。第二句「文武の道は」と第四句「稽古の徳に」は、ともに七音で、〈三音語＋の＋二音語＋助詞〉という同じ骨組を持つ。その二つの七音句が、五音の腰句「両輪と」を上下から挟むため、第三句は比喩を述べるだけでなく、歌全体の車軸として働きます。さらに、全句が五・七・五・七・七に過不足なく収まる整った音数は、片方だけが先走ることを許さず、「文」と「武」の釣り合いを韻律そのもので実演する。短歌の第三句が「腰句」とも呼ばれることまで重ねれば、この首では腰に据えられた「両輪」が一首の姿勢を決めている、と読めます。文武を車輪に見立てるだけでなく、歌の形まで車の構えに見立て返す、二重の見立てです。

そこへ、対句的な二項構成が重なります。上句の「文武」は文／武を一語に束ね、結句の「身魂」は身／魂を一語に束ねる。外にある二つの修養領域が、中央の「両輪」を通って、内にある二つの生命相へ折り返されるわけです。しかも「文武の二道」と複数化せず「文武の道」と単数で置き、末尾でも「身と魂」と分けず「身魂」と結ぶため、この対句は二者の対立を強めるのではなく、二つを一つとして働かせるための対句になる。「両輪」は二を数える語であると同時に、二つを一台の運行へまとめる語でもあります。厳密な漢詩的対句というより、語格と意味の対応を離れた句どうしに配した、対句的平行法と呼ぶのがふさわしいでしょう。

第三句「両輪と」には、省略法も働いています。「両輪として」「両輪となり」「両輪となして」などの述語を言い切らず、「と」だけを残すため、そこには定型的な切れ字を用いない、意味上の三句切れが生まれる。「と」は上句の見立てをいったん締めながら、下句の成就へなお文を開いておく蝶番です。さらに各句末を追うと、「より／は／と／に」と四句続けて助詞が置かれ、本格的な述語は結句の「悟りぬ」まで現れません。これは強い句またがりというより、係り受けを末句まで懸けておく統語の懸垂です。古・文武・道・両輪・稽古・徳・身魂と観念の核を順に積み上げたのち、最後の「悟りぬ」で一首を初めて動かす。その意味で、省略法とともに、結句へ向かって文勢を高める漸層的な句法も働いています。

縁語の働きも、既出の掛詞的余響や同音連想とは別の層に見えてきます。「道」と「両輪」は車行の語群をつくり、明記されない「車」を背後に立ち上げる。車そのものを言わず、部分である両輪から乗り物全体とその進行を起こす点では、提喩的な省筆も働いています。一方、「稽古―徳―悟り」は修行と成就の語群をつくる。車行の縁と修行の縁とが第三句で重なるため、道を進む像が、そのまま稽古によって悟りへ至る像へ移されるのです。また、初句の「古」は第四句の「稽古」の内部に再び現れる。同じ字が離れた位置で回帰する同字照応によって、「古より」は過去を飾るだけでなく、現在の稽古の中へ折り返される。これは掛詞というより、字面と語義の双方で働く遠隔照応と呼ぶ方が正確です。

「文武は車の両輪の如し」という既成の言い回しを背後に置く点も、特定の古歌の語句を取り込む本歌取りとは区別しながら、成句の引喩、あるいは本説取りに近い働きとして押さえられます。近世の用例には「文武は車の両輪の如し、偏廃すべからざる者也」という形も確認され、「両輪」だけで車の全体像のみならず、片方を廃してはならないという教訓まで呼び起こします。本説は和歌だけでなく、物語・詩文・故事・俗に言い習わされた事柄を典拠とする場合にも用いられるため、この首は古歌の本歌取りというより、伝承された文武観を圧縮して取り込む成句摂取と見るのが堅実です。その古い成句を下句の「稽古の徳」と「身魂悟りぬ」へ接続し直すことで、外から与えられた教訓は、身魂に起こる実証へ変えられます。

文法上の省略も、もう一層の余白をつくります。このページの補読どおり「古きより」とするなら、「古き」は「古き時」「古き世」などの体言を省いた準体法として圧縮される。また「身魂悟りぬ」には「が」も「を」もないため、ページの訳のように「身魂が悟った」と身魂を主体化する読みと、「身魂を悟った」と身魂を悟りの対象にする読みとが接近します。「悟る」は基本的には他動詞として記述される一方、仏教語として目的語を言わず「悟りを開く」の意味にも用いられるため、格助詞の省略は単なる音数調整では終わりません。主体が身魂を悟るのか、身魂そのものが悟りを開くのか、その境を無助詞が薄くするわけです。

語種の配置も、この内外の往還を支えています。漢語密度の高い「文武・両輪・稽古・徳」という教理の核を、和語の調べを強く持つ「古きより」と「身魂悟りぬ」が包む。初句では古伝へ遡り、中三句では漢語によって原理を固め、結句では再び身・魂・悟るという身体化された語へ戻る構えです。抽象的な教えが最後には生きた身魂の運動へ戻されるため、この首の「悟り」は頭だけの理解に留まりません。和漢混淆は単なる語彙上の混在ではなく、文として学ばれた原理を、身において成就させるための声調配置になっています。

したがって、この首で新たに強く認定できるのは、対句的平行、形式と意味の同型性、述語省略、句末助詞の連鎖、漸層的な結句集約、遠隔照応、二系列の縁語、提喩的省筆、成句引喩、準体法、無助詞格の揺らぎ、和漢混淆の包摂です。反対に、歌枕・枕詞・厳密な序詞・係り結び・体言止めをここへ無理に立てる必要はなく、定型的な切れ字もありません。この首の技巧は語をさらに掛け増すことより、「二つを一つとして回す」構造そのものにあります。

発話行為理論

ここでオースティン（Austin, 1962）の三区分を重ねると、この首の働きがさらに立体になります。発話行為（locutionary）としては――「古より／文武の道は／両輪と」が原理を掲げ、「稽古の徳に／身魂悟りぬ」がその原理の成就相を言い切る。しかも上句から下句への折りでは、一・二句の「古より」「文武の道」が四句「稽古の徳」へ折り返される。稽古は本来「古を稽える」ことを含むため、古への遡行がそのまま現在の鍛錬へ畳み込まれているからです。さらに三句「両輪と」は、ただ比喩を置く場所ではなく、切れを生む蝶番であり、五句「身魂悟りぬ」へ向けて、外なる二輪を内なる覚醒へ変換する中軸になっています。

発話内行為（illocutionary）として見るなら、この歌は説明文ではありません。文と武と稽古の読み方そのものを定める教導の言葉です。「古より」が古伝の権威を立て、「両輪と」が公理のように響き、そこへ「稽古の徳」が差し込まれることで、武道の稽古は技能の反復から、徳を積み、身魂を開く行へと格上げされる。掛詞的余響と同音連想の厚みもここで効いてきます。両輪・徳・身魂に重なる複数の気配は、厳密な掛詞として統語的に二重化されているわけではないものの、単なる装飾ではなく、一回の発声に倫理・利益・霊性の連想を重ねるからです。

そして発話媒介行為（perlocutionary）の側では、読後に残る作用こそ大きい。片輪のまま進もうとする稽古への違和、知と武を切り離していた発想への自戒、身と魂を別物にしていた感覚への揺さぶり――そうしたものが静かに起こる。三句でいったん立ち上がった「両輪」の像が、末句「身魂悟りぬ」で内面化されるため、この首は教義を述べて終わらず、姿勢そのものに小さな方向転換を起こそうとする。「なるほど」という理解が発話内行為の成立だとすれば、「稽古のあり方を正さねばならぬ」という動き出した気分は、まさに発話媒介行為の側に属しています。

コーダ

「文武の道は両輪」とは、学問と武の両方で優れた者になれ、というだけの教えではない。二つの力を自分に加えることよりも、その二つが互いを独走させない関係を育てることが問われている。文は武のふるまいに問いを返し、武は文の理解を、生きた身体と相手のいる場へ連れ戻す。学びがふるまいを導き、ふるまいが学びを改める。その往還の中で、「両輪」は所有する能力の数ではなく、一つの道を共に進む働きとなる。

だから、「二つを一つとして働かせる」ことは、違いを消すことではない。文が武の飾りとなり、武が文の正しさを力で押し通すようになれば、二つの名を掲げていても、働いているのは片輪だけだろう。両輪であるためには、どちらも他方に代われず、しかも他方を置き去りにできない。同じように、「身魂」は身体の上に魂を載せた二階建ての自己ではない。学ぶこと、動くこと、応じること、悟ることが、一つの生から切り離せないのである。文武を結んだ上句が身魂を結ぶ下句へ帰ってくるとき、稽古の徳は、知識や技能の一部分ではなく、その生の全体に及ぶものとして響き始める。

ここで、「古より」の「古」が「稽古」の中へ帰ってくることも重い。古は、いまの身体から遠ざけて保存されるだけの過去ではない。伝えられた言葉を、いまの呼吸と手足が引き受けるとき、古は現在の働きになる。この解説のように、そこを獣の身体に宿る古き道へまで読み開くなら、稽古は生命の外に立ってそれを統御するための学びではなく、自分もすでに生命の場の内にあることを学び直す行となる。文は身体を捨てず、武は言葉を捨てない。どちらも、生を置き去りにして先へ進まない。

しかし、両輪の釣り合いだけで、進むべき方向まで定まるわけではない。よく学び、よく動けるとして、その力は何を運ぶのか。この解説が六つのプライマーへ結び直した問いは、そこに残る。神や人と合う関係を、自分の完成を確かめるためだけの道具にはできない。和と美へ向かい、至愛の源に順うという方向のもとでこそ、文武の両輪は、自己を大きくするためだけでなく、ともに生きる場を担うために働く。徳は、どれほど身につけたと語れるかだけではなく、その身につけたものによって、相手とのあいだに何が可能になるかに現れる。学びも強さも、関係の外で完成したものを持ち込むのではなく、関係の中で、その質を問われ続けるのである。

そして、歌は「悟りぬ」と言い切る。目覚めは、いつか届くかもしれない理想のままには置かれず、成就したこととして語られる。けれども、その完了を、稽古から降りてよいという免状にしてはならない。歌が目覚めを成就として語ることと、読者が自分の完成を宣言することとは、同じではないからだ。読む者に残されるのは、その言葉の強さに寄りかかることではなく、目覚めが次の出会い、次の一動作をどう変えるかという問いである。「わかった」が「だから、こうふるまう」へ渡されるところで、歌の言葉は、読む者の身魂に引き受けられ始める。

一首は終わる。しかし、文は次のふるまいを待ち、そのふるまいは次の学びを開く。両輪は、互いの代わりにはならず、互いを残してもゆかない。古き道は、そのようにして、いまの地面に触れる。悟りのあとに残るのは、道を眺める者ではない。その道を生きる、身魂である。

English Translation

Commentary

This page’s Dōka 115, “furuki yori / bunbu no michi wa / ryōrin to / keiko no toku ni / mitama satorinu (古より／文武の道は／両輪と／稽古の徳に／身魂悟りぬ),” begins by singing, in its first three lines—“Since ancient times, the way of scholarship and martiality has been like the ‘two wheels’ of a cart”—the familiar ideal of bunbu ryōdō (文武両道), the joint cultivation of letters and arms, just as it stands. As the notes observe, the way of bun and bu does not set “learning”—letters and scholarship—against “martial practice”—martiality. Rather, it presents them as two-as-one: a pair of wheels without which the cart cannot travel straight. When the poem then continues, “keiko no toku ni / mitama satorinu (稽古の徳に／身魂悟りぬ),” keiko is no mere repetition of exercises. In the word’s literal sense, it is the discipline of “examining the ancient,” inishie o kangaeru (古を稽える). In this page’s reading, that “ancient” opens toward the ancient ways dwelling within these animal bodies. Through the toku (徳) accumulated within that discipline—the power of ethical and spiritual maturation—the mitama (身魂), “body and spirit,” satorinu (悟りぬ): awakened. As the page’s grammatical notes teach, the perfective auxiliary nu (ぬ) lends the ending the force of “truly and unmistakably awakened.”

When the thread is wound back through Ueshiba Morihei’s Six Primers, the composition comes quietly and clearly into view. The martial principle disclosed by Primer One, “Bu = Cosmic Principle,” Bu = Uchū Genri (武＝宇宙原理), is here made concrete in the requirement that bu not race ahead by itself: the wheel of bun—learning and language—must continue turning at equal measure. Primer Two, “Aiki with Kami / Another / Others,” Kami ya Hito to no Aiki (神や人との合気), becomes the entrance through which those two wheels of letters and arms are brought into inter-kami, interpersonal relationships, and the forming of a shared field. Primer Three, “Heart-mind and Spirit, Inseparable,” Shinkon Ichinyo (心魂一如), is the central axis that prevents bun as head and bu as body from being torn apart: what has been learned appears directly in the conduct of the hands and feet, while bodily conduct, in turn, deepens learning. Primer Four, “Harmonious Beautification,” Wagō Bika (和合美化), determines the direction of travel—not cutting the world into pieces through bun, and not beating it down through bu, but carrying it toward harmony and beauty upon both wheels together.

Primer Five, “Body = Dōjō; Heart-mind = Practitioner / Ascetic / Learner,” Karada/Tai = Dōjō, Kokoro = Shūgyōsha / Shugyōsha / Manabite (体＝道場、心＝修業者／修行者／学び手), belongs precisely to the poem’s “virtue of keiko.” Daily practice is the field that sustains mitama satorinu (身魂悟りぬ), the awakening of body and soul. Primer Six, “Follow the Source of Supreme Love,” “Shiai” no Minamoto ni Shitagau (「至愛」の源に順う), supplies the highest measure whenever either scholarship or martiality asks, “For what purpose?” The references assembled on this page likewise establish with care the historical contexts surrounding conceptions of bun and bu, and of keiko, toku, and mitama.

The poem also joins naturally to the three immediately preceding it. Dōka 112, “iki inochi / meguri sakayuru / yo no shikumi / tama no aiki wa / ame no ukihashi (いきいのち／廻り栄ゆる／世の仕組／たまの合気は／天の浮橋),” sang that the circulation of breath and life is itself the structure of the world, and that the “aiki of the spirit” operates within it as the Floating Bridge of Heaven. Dōka 113, “ichirei no moto no mi-oya mi-sugata wa hibiki hikarite zo umareshi kotodama (一霊の元の御親御姿は響き光りてぞ生れし言霊),” placed the source of bun—of language itself—on the cosmological plane: kotodama is born where the august form of the Primordial Parent of the One Spirit resounds and shines. Dōka 114, “izu no o no kori-tama harau izu-mitama o hikari no naka ni takeru otakebi (伊都のをのこり霊はらう伊都魂を光の中にたける雄武び),” portrayed the purification of the crusted-on “congealed spirit,” the restoration of the august Izu-mitama to the light, and only then the proper arising of the heroic martial cry.

Against that background, Dōka 115 may be read as a summation: scholarship—learning and kotodama—and martiality—the body and its heroic cry—continue turning as the “two wheels” of the entire field of the infinitely extending cross-way, jūjidō (十字道); through the virtue generated by the keiko conducted within that field, body and spirit unmistakably awaken. The cross-way was never a point-like sign. It was the field itself, in which the vertical axis of heaven and earth and the horizontal axis of the four directions cross without limit. Remembering this, the two wheels of bun and bu likewise become the wheels that set that infinite field in motion, while the daily practice that continues to travel through it becomes the real engine of mitama satorinu (身魂悟りぬ).

A one-sentence colloquial summary

“Since ancient times, the ways of letters and arms have been like the two wheels of a cart, and through the virtue of keiko, both body and spirit awaken.”

Supplement: Making “two wheels” the poem’s structural principle

The first device still to be gathered from this poem is that “two wheels” is not confined to the level of metaphorical content. It is transferred into the very manner in which the poem is constructed. The second line, “bunbu no michi wa (文武の道は),” and the fourth, “keiko no toku ni (稽古の徳に),” are both seven mora long and share the same underlying frame: a three-mora compound, followed by no, a two-mora noun, and a particle. Because those two seven-mora lines enclose the five-mora waist line, “ryōrin to (両輪と),” from above and below, the third line does more than state the metaphor. It serves as the axle of the poem itself. Moreover, the unbroken regularity of 5–7–5–7–7 permits neither side to rush ahead of the other. The meter itself enacts the balance of bun and bu. Since the third line of a tanka is also known as its “waist line,” the “two wheels” set at the waist may be said to determine the posture of the entire poem. This is a double mitate (見立て): letters and arms are likened to wheels, and the form of the poem is then likened in return to the stance of the cart.

A paired, antithetical structure is laid over this design. In the upper verse, bunbu (文武) binds bun and bu into a single word; in the concluding line, mitama (身魂) binds body and spirit into another. The two external domains of cultivation thus pass through the central “two wheels” and fold back into the two internal aspects of living being. Yet the poem does not pluralize them as “the two ways of letters and arms,” bunbu no ni-dō (文武の二道). It places them in the singular as “the way of letters and arms,” bunbu no michi (文武の道). At the end, likewise, it does not separate them as “body and spirit,” mi to tamashii (身と魂), but joins them as mitama (身魂). The parallelism therefore does not sharpen an opposition between two things. It makes two things operate as one. “Two wheels” is a phrase that counts two, but it is equally a phrase that gathers those two into the single motion of one vehicle. Rather than a strict antithetical couplet in the Chinese poetic manner, this is more properly described as antithetical parallelism, distributing correspondences of verbal register and meaning across separated lines.

Ellipsis is also active in the third line, “ryōrin to (両輪と).” The poem does not complete an expression such as “as two wheels,” ryōrin to shite (両輪として), “becoming two wheels,” ryōrin to nari (両輪となり), or “making them two wheels,” ryōrin to nashite (両輪となして). It leaves only the particle to. The result is a semantic third-line cut, sanku-gire (三句切れ), produced without a conventional kireji (切れ字). The particle to momentarily closes the comparison of the upper verse while still leaving the sentence open toward the accomplishment of the lower verse. It is a hinge.

The line endings reinforce this suspension. For four consecutive lines the poem ends with particles—yori / wa / to / ni (より／は／と／に)—and no fully finite predicate appears until the final satorinu (悟りぬ). This is less a forceful instance of ku-matagari (句またがり), or enjambment across lines, than a syntactic suspension that keeps the relations of dependency hanging until the concluding line. Antiquity, letters and arms, the way, two wheels, keiko, virtue, and body-spirit are placed one after another as conceptual nuclei. Only with the final “awakened” does the poem begin to move. Together with ellipsis, therefore, a gradational phrasing is at work, gathering and intensifying the sentence’s force toward the last line.

The operation of engo (縁語), or associated diction, also emerges on a level distinct from the previously noted kakekotoba-like resonances and homophonic associations. Michi (道), “way,” and ryōrin (両輪), “two wheels,” form a semantic field of vehicular travel and call forth the unspoken cart behind them. Because the whole vehicle and its movement arise from the mention of only one of its parts—the wheels—a synecdochic economy is also at work. Meanwhile, keiko–toku–satori (稽古―徳―悟り) forms a second semantic field, that of discipline and attainment. The field of travel and the field of spiritual practice overlap at the third line, allowing the image of proceeding along a way to pass directly into the image of reaching awakening through keiko.

The character for “ancient,” ko (古), in the opening line then returns inside keiko (稽古) in the fourth. Through this recurrence of the same written character at a distance—a same-character correspondence, dōji shōō (同字照応)—“from ancient times” does more than ornament the poem with a remote past. The ancient is folded back into present practice. This is more accurately described as remote correspondence, enkaku shōō (遠隔照応), operating simultaneously through graphic form and lexical meaning, rather than as a kakekotoba in the strict sense.

The poem also places behind itself the received expression “letters and arms are like the two wheels of a cart,” bunbu wa kuruma no ryōrin no gotoshi (文武は車の両輪の如し). This should be distinguished from honkadori (本歌取り), the incorporation of language from a particular earlier poem. Its operation is closer to an allusion to a set phrase, or to honsetsudori (本説取り), the drawing of force from an underlying traditional source. Early-modern usage includes the formulation, “bunbu wa kuruma no ryōrin no gotoshi, henpai subekarazaru mono nari (文武は車の両輪の如し、偏廃すべからざる者也)”—“Letters and arms are like the two wheels of a cart; neither may be allowed to fall into neglect.” The mere phrase “two wheels” thus evokes not only the image of the cart as a whole, but also the inherited injunction that neither side may be discarded.

The underlying source of an allusion need not be another waka. It may be a tale, a work of poetry or prose, a historical anecdote, or something passed down in proverbial speech. It is therefore more prudent to understand this poem not as an instance of honkadori from an earlier verse, but as a compressed adoption of a transmitted conception of letters and arms—a set-phrase uptake, seiku sesshu (成句摂取). By reconnecting that old maxim to “the virtue of keiko” and “body-spirit awakened,” the poem transforms an externally inherited injunction into something verified within the body and spirit.

Grammatical ellipsis opens another layer of space. Following the supplementary reading supplied on this page, “furuki yori (古きより),” the adjectival furuki may be understood quasi-nominally, through juntaibō (準体法), with an omitted substantive such as “ancient times,” furuki toki (古き時), or “an ancient age,” furuki yo (古き世). In “mitama satorinu (身魂悟りぬ),” meanwhile, neither the subject marker ga (が) nor the object marker o (を) appears. This draws two readings close together: “the body-spirit awakened,” mitama ga satotta (身魂が悟った), which makes mitama the subject, and “one awakened to, or realized, the body-spirit,” mitama o satotta (身魂を悟った), which makes it the object of realization.

The verb satoru (悟る) is fundamentally described as transitive, yet in Buddhist usage it may also appear without an expressed object in the sense of attaining awakening, as in “to open awakening,” satori o hiraku (悟りを開く). The omission of the case particle therefore does more than accommodate the meter. Does an implied subject awaken to body-spirit, or does body-spirit itself open into awakening? The absence of a particle thins the boundary between those possibilities.

The distribution of lexical strata supports this movement between outer and inner. The doctrinal center of the poem is dense with Sino-Japanese compounds—bunbu (文武), ryōrin (両輪), keiko (稽古), and toku (徳)—while it is enclosed by the strongly native cadence of “furuki yori (古きより)” and “mitama satorinu (身魂悟りぬ).” The opening reaches backward toward ancient transmission; the middle establishes its principle through compact Sino-Japanese vocabulary; and the conclusion returns to the embodied words of body, soul, and awakening. Because the abstract teaching is returned at last to the movement of a living body-spirit, the poem’s awakening is not confined to intellectual understanding. This mixture of native and Sino-Japanese diction, wakan konkō (和漢混淆), is not merely a mingling of vocabulary. It is a tonal arrangement through which a principle learned in letters is brought to fulfillment in the body.

The devices that can therefore be identified with particular strength are antithetical parallelism, the isomorphism of form and meaning, predicate ellipsis, the chain of line-final particles, gradational convergence upon the final line, remote correspondence, two intersecting series of engo, synecdochic economy, set-phrase allusion, quasi-nominal construction, ambiguity produced by unmarked case, and the encompassing movement of mixed native and Sino-Japanese diction. Conversely, there is no need to force an utamakura (歌枕), makurakotoba (枕詞), strict jokotoba (序詞), kakari-musubi (係り結び), or taigendome (体言止め) into the poem, nor is there a conventional kireji. Its artistry lies less in multiplying additional pivots than in the structure that makes “two operate as one and continue turning.”

Speech Act Theory

When Austin’s (1962) tripartite distinction is laid over the poem, its operation acquires another dimension. As a locutionary act, “furuki yori / bunbu no michi wa / ryōrin to (古より／文武の道は／両輪と)” proclaims a principle, while “keiko no toku ni / mitama satorinu (稽古の徳に／身魂悟りぬ)” declares the accomplished condition arising from that principle. At the fold, ori (折り), from the kami-no-ku (上句) into the shimo-no-ku (下句), the “from ancient times” and “way of letters and arms” of the first and second lines fold back into the fourth line’s “virtue of keiko.” Because keiko itself contains the sense of “examining the ancient,” inishie o kangaeru (古を稽える), the movement backward into antiquity is folded directly into present training. The third line, “ryōrin to (両輪と),” is not merely the location of a comparison. It is the hinge that produces the cut and the central axis that transforms the two outer wheels into the inward awakening of “mitama satorinu (身魂悟りぬ).”

As an illocutionary act, the poem is not explanatory prose. It is a word of instruction that determines how letters, arms, and keiko are to be understood. “Furuki yori (古より)” establishes the authority of ancient transmission. “Ryōrin to (両輪と)” sounds almost axiomatic. Once “keiko no toku (稽古の徳)” is inserted, martial training is elevated from the repetition of skill into a discipline that accumulates virtue and opens body and spirit. Kakekotoba-like after-resonances and homophonic associations also take effect here. The several undertones gathering around ryōrin, toku, and mitama are not syntactically doubled as strict kakekotoba. Nevertheless, they are not merely ornamental: they allow a single utterance to gather ethical, practical, and spiritual associations at once.

On the perlocutionary side, the effect left after reading is particularly substantial: unease toward a practice attempting to advance upon one wheel; self-admonition over having separated knowledge from martiality; and a disturbance of the habit of treating body and spirit as unrelated things. Such responses arise quietly. Because the image of the “two wheels” erected in the third line is internalized by the final “mitama satorinu (身魂悟りぬ),” the poem does not end after stating a doctrine. It attempts to produce a small reorientation in posture itself.

If the understanding naruhodo (「なるほど」)—“I see”—marks the successful uptake of the illocutionary act, then the newly stirred impulse keiko no arikata o tadasaneba naranu (「稽古のあり方を正さねばならぬ」)—“the manner of practice must be set right”—belongs precisely to the perlocutionary act.

Coda

The teaching that letters and arms are “two wheels,” ryōrin (両輪), asks more than that one become accomplished in both scholarship and martiality. What matters is not merely adding two powers to oneself, but cultivating a relationship in which neither can run ahead unchecked. Learning questions martial conduct; martial practice brings understanding back into a field inhabited by living bodies and others. Learning guides conduct, and conduct revises learning. Within that circulation, “two wheels” ceases to name the number of abilities one possesses. It names the work of proceeding together along one way.

To make two operate as one is therefore not to erase their difference. When learning becomes an ornament for martial power, or martial power imposes what learning declares to be true, two names may remain while only one wheel does the work. To be two wheels, neither can replace the other, and neither can leave the other behind. Likewise, body-spirit, mitama (身魂), is not a two-story self with a spirit housed above a body. Learning, moving, responding, and awakening cannot be detached from the one life that undertakes them. When the upper verse’s joining of letters and arms returns as the lower verse’s joining of body and spirit, the virtue of keiko begins to sound as something that reaches the whole of that life, rather than one compartment of its knowledge or skill.

It matters, too, that the “ancient” of the opening returns within keiko (稽古). The ancient is not merely a past preserved at a distance from the present body. When inherited words are taken up by present breath, hands, and feet, the ancient becomes a present activity. Following this commentary’s extension of that reading toward the ancient ways dwelling in animal bodies, keiko becomes not a learning that stands outside life in order to govern it, but a discipline of learning again that one already belongs within life’s field. Letters do not abandon the body; arms do not abandon language. Neither advances by leaving life behind.

Yet the balance of the two wheels does not, by itself, determine the direction of travel. Granted that one learns well and moves well, what does that capacity carry? The question this commentary reconnects to the Six Primers remains there. Relations of aiki with kami and people cannot be reduced to instruments for confirming one’s own completeness. Under the orientation toward harmony and beauty, and toward following the source of Supreme Love, the two wheels work not merely to enlarge the self, but to sustain a field of shared life. Virtue, toku (徳), appears not only in how much one can claim to have cultivated, but in what that cultivation makes possible between oneself and another. Neither learning nor strength enters relationship as something perfected elsewhere. Within relationship, the quality of each remains answerable.

And then the poem says satorinu (悟りぬ): “awakened.” Awakening is not left as an ideal that might someday be reached; it is spoken as accomplished. Yet that completion must not become a certificate permitting one to step out of practice. The poem’s declaration of fulfilled awakening and the reader’s declaration of personal completeness are not the same thing. What remains for the reader is not to lean upon the strength of the declaration, but to ask how awakening changes the next encounter, the next movement. Where “I understand” passes into “therefore, this is how I act,” the poem’s words begin to be taken up by the reader’s living body-spirit.

The poem ends. Yet learning awaits the next act, and that act opens the next learning. Neither wheel can stand in for the other; neither can leave the other behind. In this way, the ancient way touches the ground of the present. What remains after awakening is not a spectator looking upon the way. It is the body-spirit living it.

References

American Academy of Poets. (n.d.). Tanka. Retrieved November 18, 2025, from https://poets.org/glossary/tanka

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Benesch, O. (2014). Inventing the way of the samurai: Nationalism, internationalism, and bushidō in modern Japan. Oxford University Press.

Bennett, A. (2017). Bushido and the art of living: An inquiry into samurai values. Japan Publishing Industry Foundation for Culture.

Blacker, C. (1975/1986). The catalpa bow: A study of shamanistic practices in Japan. Allen & Unwin / Japan Library.

Brower, R. H., & Miner, E. (1961). Japanese court poetry. Stanford University Press.

Carter, S. D. (1991). Traditional Japanese poetry: An anthology. Stanford University Press.

Cranston, E. A. (1993). A waka anthology: Volume one: The Gem‑Glistening Cup. Stanford University Press.

Frellesvig, B. (2010). A history of the Japanese language. Cambridge University Press.

Greenhalgh, M. (2003). Aikido and spirituality: Japanese religious influences in a martial art (Master’s thesis). Durham University e-Theses. https://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4081/

Ignatieva, A. (2022). The concept of kotodama as a fragment of Japanese national worldview. SHS Web of Conferences, 125.

Picken, S. D. B. (1994). Essentials of Shinto: An analytical guide to principal teachings. Greenwood Press.

Rambelli, F. (2007). Buddhist materiality: A cultural history of objects in Japanese Buddhism. Stanford University Press.

Shūeisha. (n.d.). 「文武は車の両輪」. In Imidas Proverb Dictionary. Retrieved from https://imidas.jp/proverb/detail/X-02-C-28-A-0008.html

Seeley, C. (1991). A history of writing in Japan. University of Hawai‘i Press.

Shirane, H. (2005). Classical Japanese: A grammar. Columbia University Press.

Shirane, H. (Ed.). (2007). Traditional Japanese literature: An anthology, beginnings to 1600. Columbia University Press.

Stalker, N. K. (2008). Prophet motive: Deguchi Onisaburō, Ōmoto, and the rise of new religions in imperial Japan. University of Hawai‘i Press.

Stevens, J. (1993). The essence of aikido: Spiritual teachings of Morihei Ueshiba. Kodansha International.

Ueshiba, M. (1977). 合気道奥義（道歌）(S. Abe, Ed.). 阿部, 醒石. Retrieved from http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yp7h-td/douka.htm

Vovin, A. (2003). A reference grammar of classical Japanese prose. RoutledgeCurzon.

Yonei, T. (n.d.a). Aramitama. In Encyclopedia of Shinto [EOS]. Kokugakuin University. Retrieved October 16, 2025, from https://d-museum.kokugakuin.ac.jp/eos/detail/?id=9012

Yonei, T. (n.d.b). Nigimitama. In Encyclopedia of Shinto [EOS]. Kokugakuin University. Retrieved October 16, 2025, from https://d-museum.kokugakuin.ac.jp/eos/detail/?id=8736

Appendix I: Change Modification Log

			
SEP 26 - Added application of Primer 2's inclusion of kami; added codas to Japanese and English commentaries.
AUG 26 - Added additional poetics analysis; added English translation of commentary; removed the proposed negative reading of 悟りぬ; clarified the perfective auxiliary ぬ; reclassified speculative alternative graphings as homophonic and orthographic after-resonance; distinguished the lexical sense of 稽古 from the page’s animal-body interpretation; and corrected translation and terminology.
AUG 26 - Improved formatting.
MAY 26 - Added Speech Act Analysis; updated citation style.
APR 26 - Removed bracketed gloss "that moves society forward" in prose translation.
APR 26 - Corrected Yonei references.
DEC 25 - Phase V styling applied to waka.
NOV 25 - Phase IV completion; added commentary.
OCT 25 - Updated translations via critical translations steps of Phase IV.
OCT 25 - Phase III completion.
APR 20 - Initial notes transferred.

		