修行会

解説

このページの第119首は「大御親／七十五ツの／御情動に／世のいとなみは／いや栄えぬる」。ここでは、大御親（おおみおや）が生み出す七十五の「御情動（ごじょうどう）＝神格の“感じ／動き”が、世のいとなみ（生活・営為・祭祀）をいや栄え（弥栄）へと運ぶ、と言い切る。第118首が「七十五声**」で音＝言霊のマトリクス（50＋濁20＋半濁5）を立てたのに対し、本首は声の“動き（flow）”＝情動にピントを合わせ、音→運動→繁栄の順に射程を広げている。語法上も、にで因→果をつなぎ、…ぬる（完了・結果）で「栄えた（栄えている）」を強く確定させる運びが効いている。

植芝盛平の六つのプライマーで読むと設計が明瞭になる。プライマーの第一原理〈武＝宇宙原理〉は、“七十五”という宇宙の声位（言霊）が御情動＝動きとして世界秩序を駆動する、という前提を与える。プライマーの第三原理〈心魂一如〉は、声（言）・身（技）・心（意）を同一拍で動かし、感じがそのまま所作に映る芯をつくる。プライマーの第二原理〈人との合気〉は、その御情動を呼吸・間合い・ことばで相手との関係に“合わせて”運ぶ入口、プライマーの第四原理〈和合美化〉は壊す言動ではなく、場を“いや栄え”へ織り直す言動を価値基準に据える。プライマーの第五原理〈体＝道場、心＝修業者／修行者心／学び手〉は一声・一息・一手を“流れ（flow）”の最小単位の稽古として磨く秤、プライマーの第六原理〈「至愛」の源に順う〉はどの情動を響かせるかの最上位の判断軸――授かった流れを、愛にかなう方向へ用いることを要請している。

直前の三首とも糸が通る。第116首は「合気の技＝草薙ののり」と、濁りを断ち道を守る規範（のり）を示した。第117首は「天地＝主の造りし一家」と、世界をひとつの家として観る座標を与えた。第118首は「七十五の声で経綸（織り）を賜う」と、音が世界を編む原像を提示した。これらを受けた#119は、“声”が“情動の流れ”となって一家（世界）のいとなみを弥栄へ動かす段階を歌っている。実地では――（第116首）草薙ののりで言動を澄まし、（第117首）同じ家の子として関係を結び、（第118首）声の織りを思い出し、（第119首）その声の“動き”を呼吸と技で流し入れる。そのとき、合気の一声・一拍・一挙は、世のいとなみを“いや栄え”へ運ぶ小さな起点になる。

口語要約のひとこと

「大御親の七十五の御情動によって、この世の営みはますます栄えていく。」

詩法の追補――腰句をあふれさせる「御」、名詞から動詞へひらく弥栄

短歌の第三句は、古来「腰句」とも呼ばれる。本首では、その腰句「御情動に」が意味上の蝶番であるだけでなく、音数上も実際に一拍ふくらんでいる。しかも、モーラをさらに精密に分ければ、「じょうどうに」は、じょ・う・ど・う・にの五モーラであり、定型からあふれる直接の一拍は、敬称接頭辞「ご―」そのものである。すなわち、字余りを起こしているのは「情動」だけではなく、それを神聖化する「御」である。二つの長音が腰句をゆるやかに引き伸ばし、そこへ「御」の一拍が加わることで、神格への尊崇が韻律の器を押し広げる。さらに、音読上の濁音「ご・じょ・ど」もこの第三句へ集中し、他の四句には見られない重い音色の核をつくる。御情動は意味として動くだけでなく、一首の「腰」を濁らせ、ふくらませ、形式そのものを動かしているのである。第三句を「腰句」と呼ぶ伝統的な句名も、この働きをいっそう身体的に聞かせる。

この一拍の破調は、そのまま放置されない。上の句が五・七・六とわずかに定型を外れるのに対し、下の句は「世のいとなみは／いや栄えぬる」と七・七へ正確に戻る。第四句は主題を掲げる名詞句、第五句はその主題を受ける述部であり、下句は「提題―叙述」の均衡した二肢構文を形成する。厳密な意味での対句ではないが、前半の七音が問いを懸け、後半の七音が結果を返すような、応答的な釣り合いがある。したがって本首の韻律は、単に第三句で乱れるのではなく、破調から整調へ進む。御情動の一拍のあふれを世のいとなみが受け取り、その動揺を七・七の弥栄へ整えるのである。字余りは秩序の失敗ではなく、秩序が生成されるための初動となる。

さらに見落としやすいのは、本首全体に活用を完結させる述語が、結句「栄えぬる」一つしかないことである。それ以前には、「大御親」「七十五ツ」「御情動」「世のいとなみ」と、体言または体言を中心とする句が重ねられる。とりわけ「情動」は名詞であり、「いとなみ」は動詞「営む」の連用形から名詞化した語であり、最後の「栄えぬる」に至って初めて、動きが活用する用言として文を閉じる。言い換えれば、運動はまず「情動」という抽象名詞の内部に名づけられ、次に「いとなみ」という動作性を残した名詞へ移り、最後に「栄えぬる」という現実の出来事として発動する。これは既注の動態的縁語を、品詞の水準でさらに押し進める名詞―動作名詞―動詞の漸層である。歌が述べる「情動→営み→繁栄」の流れを、文法そのものが「名づけられた動き→行われる動き→成就した動き」として実演している。

その一方で、意味上もっとも高位にある「大御親」は、統語上、世界を直接支配する主語には置かれていない。既注のように「大御親〔の〕七十五ツの御情動に」と読むなら、神的根源を含む上句全体は「に」によって示される原因・媒介・場であり、主題として「は」を与えられるのは、下句の「世のいとなみ」である。しかも「栄える」は自動詞であって、「大御親が世を栄えさせる」という他動詞的・使役的構文にはなっていない。神格の御情動は外部から世界を操作する主体ではなく、そのうちで、あるいはそれを通して、世のいとなみがおのずから栄えるための条件となる。ここには、意味上の神的階層と統語上の主題階層をずらす主格回避と、繁栄を強制ではなく発生として表す自動詞的生成がある。「に」の原因性は、この自動詞構文と結びつくことで、機械的な作用因よりも、情動が満ちる場・契機・流れとして聞こえる。

また、第一句と第三句に置かれた「御」は、既注の同字異音に加えて、上句を「御―七十五―御」と囲む隔行反復を形成する。「大御親／七十五ツの／御情動に」と、二つの「御」が数詞を両側から抱え込み、七十五を単なる数量ではなく、神聖な生成座標として額縁化するのである。第一句の「御」は根源の尊称をつくり、第三句の「御」はその根源から発する動きを尊称化すると同時に、定型へ一拍を加える。したがって「御」は意味を飾る接頭辞ではなく、上句の構図と音数を実際に組み替える詩的な力となる。ところが下句へ入ると、敬語標識は消える。「世のいとなみ」そのものに「御」を冠して神聖と宣言するのではなく、上句で蓄えられた神聖性が、下句では「栄え」という結果へ姿を変える。聖性は標識として反復されず、作用として世に移されるのである。

数詞の扱いにも、既注の典故性とは別の詩法がある。このページの訓読「ななそいつつの」は、七十五を一まとまりの漢語音で告げず、「七十＋五」と時間のなかで組み立て、第二句の七モーラを満たす。数は読み上げられるあいだに分解され、もう一度合成されるのである。「ツ」は一つ一つを数えうる単位として七十五を有界化するが、結句の「いや」は増加の上限を置かない。したがって一首は、数えられる七十五から、数え終えることのできない弥栄へ移る。大御親という一つの根源、七十五の個別的な動き、世のいとなみという集合的な営為、そして「いや」によって限りなく増す繁栄――この単一・複数・総体・増殖の数的運びが、宇宙生成を数量の変化としても描いている。さらに「いつつ」の末尾には、接続助詞「つつ」と同音の「つつ」が潜む。形態論上はあくまで数詞の一部であり、正式な掛詞ではないが、耳の副次的な反響としては、反復・継続・進行の「つつ」を呼び込み、固定数の内部にすでに持続の気配を宿らせる。

第三句の異質さは、和語と漢語の対照だけにはとどまらない。「情動」は語誌上、英語 emotion の訳語として位置づけられる近代的・心理学的な抽象語であり、「大御親」「ななそいつつ」「いや」「ぬる」という神祇的・古語的な語層の中央へ、近代の学術語彙が差し込まれている。したがって本首は、一様な擬古文ではなく、古代的な祭祀語と近代的な心理語とを同じ腰句で接触させる古今混淆を含む。「情動」は伝統的な歌語の外部から来たような硬さを持つが、「御」を冠されることによって、祝詞的な宇宙語へと組み替えられる。近代心理学の語が神格の運化を語る語へ転用され、その語がさらに字余りと濁音集中を引き起こすため、第三句は語彙史・韻律・音色の三層で異化の中心となる。七十五の声を歌う一首の中央に、異なる時代共同体から来た声が置かれているのである。

意味場には、既注の「情動―いとなみ―栄え」という運動の縁語とは別に、系譜的な縁語も潜む。「みおや」は「御親」と書かれる一方、祖神・祖霊を表す「御祖」とも表記されうる。したがって「大御親」という字面が親を示しながら、その音には「大御祖」という祖先的根源も二重写しになる。これは二つの独立語義を掛ける教科書的な掛詞というより、異表記が同じ音へ重なることによる祖先義の余白である。そこへ、世界であると同時に世代でもある「世」と、家・系譜・国土・草木が盛んになる「栄え」が続くため、「御親／御祖―世／代―栄え」という生成と継承の連鎖が立ち上がる。音声上でも、「おや―よ―いや」に反復されるヤ行音が、親から世へ、世から増大へと細い音の糸を渡している。

「栄える」は社会的繁栄だけでなく、草木が繁茂することをも表す。そのため、本首には景物が一つも明示されないように見えながら、結句の内部には植物的な景が潜在している。世のいとなみは単に成功するのではなく、芽吹き、枝葉を広げるものとして見立てられる。大御親／御祖から世代が生じ、その営みが植物のように栄えるという系譜的・植物的な二重の見立てである。明示的な花・木・山・川を置かず、動詞一語の語義によって自然景を潜ませるため、これは歌枕や季節景ではなく、結句から遡って一首全体を生長の景へ変える潜在景と呼びうる。旧字「榮」が字源上「木」を意符に持つことも、この植物的余情を表記の奥で支えている。

このページの旧字体版「世の營みは／いや榮えぬる」では、さらに表記上の照応が顕在化する。字源説明によれば、旧字の「營」と「榮」はともに音符「熒」の省略形を共有しながら、前者は宮系の意符、後者は木を意符として成立する。したがって二字は語源的に同一ではないが、連続する第四・第五句に置かれると、共通する冠状部分が視覚的な脚韻に似た働きをする。耳には「いとなみ／さかえ」と異なる訓が響く一方、眼には近縁の字形が反復される。「營み」が行為を組織し、「榮え」がその行為を生長へ移すため、字面そのものが、営為から繁栄への変形を見せるのである。ただし、原歌では「いとなみ」が仮名で記されているため、これを植芝自身の意図的な文字遊びと断定することはできない。むしろ、歴史的仮名遣い・旧字体版によって初めて顕在化する、編集表記上の視覚的縁語として区別しておくのが精確である。

結句には、既注の祝言性をさらに限定する予祝の働きがある。本首は「いや栄えよ」と命じず、「いや栄えむ」と未来を推量せず、「いや栄えぬる」と、望ましい繁栄をすでに成就した結果として言表する。祈願形を用いず、完成した事実の形で寿ぐため、発話は願望と現実の距離をあらかじめ消してしまう。賀歌・寿歌では、将来の長寿や家の繁栄を先取りして歌う予祝的表現が認められるが、本首もまた、世が栄えることを求めるのではなく、すでに栄えたものとして声に載せ、その成就を発話の現在へ招き入れる。完了「ぬる」は過去を閉じるだけでなく、未来の弥栄を現在完了として先取りするのである。

この予祝性をさらに深い典拠圏へ置けば、『万葉集』巻五・八九四番歌の「言霊の幸はふ国」との共鳴も聞き取れる。そこでは言霊の霊力と国土の幸いが結ばれ、本首では七十五の声位から生じる御情動と、世のいとなみの弥栄とが結ばれる。語句を直接借りた本歌取りとは言いにくいが、神聖な声／ことばが、国・世を幸わせ、栄えさせるという古代的な言霊定式を、植芝が「七十五―御情動―いとなみ」という近代的・運動的な語彙へ組み替えた文化的反響と読むことができる。「幸はふ国」が「いや栄えぬる世のいとなみ」へ移されることで、言霊の効験は国土の属性から、生活・労働・祭祀・技法を含む動的な世界形成へ拡張される。

したがって、本首に新たな歌枕・枕詞・正式な係り結び・隠された体言止めを探し足す必要はない。追加すべき詩法は、むしろ一首の内部で起きている変換にある。「御」が腰句を一拍あふれさせ、破調が下句の七・七へ整えられ、名詞の内部に封じられた「動」が動作名詞を経て活用する動詞へほどける。意味上もっとも高い大御親は主格的な支配者にならず、世のいとなみが自動詞として栄える。七十五という有界の数は「いや」という無界の増大へ開かれ、近代心理語「情動」は古語の器の中央で神語へ変えられる。御親は御祖を響かせ、世は世代を開き、榮は見えない木を芽吹かせる。そして、まだ願われるはずの繁栄は「ぬる」によって、すでに成った事実として予祝される。七十五の声は、一首のなかで説明されているだけではない。尊称の一拍、腰句の濁り、品詞の活性化、字形の照応、完了の予祝となって、歌の身体そのものを動かしている。

発話行為理論

オースティン（Austin, 1962）の区分で見ると、本首の発語行為（locutionary）は、「大御親の七十五ツの御情動によって、世の営みがいや栄えぬる」と言表することそのものにある。ただし、言表内容は平板な命題ではなく、上の句と下の句の折り返しによって配列されている。第一・二句「大御親／七十五ツの」は、第四句「世のいとなみは」と折り重なって、宇宙的根源と世の営為とを照応させる。第三句「御情動に」は第五句「いや栄えぬる」と折り返し、神格の“感じ／動き”が結果としての弥栄へ流れ込む経路を示す。中ほどには教科書的な切れ字が露出していないが、第三句末の「に」が因果の蝶番となって切れを生み、掛詞的な連想を下句へ送り込む。

発話内行為（illocutionary）としては、宇宙論を説く説明にとどまらず、祝詞的な言い切りによって「世の営み」を弥栄へと正当化し、方向づける働きが前景化する。「こうである」と述べることが、直ちに受容と実践の教示へ傾く。ことに「いとなみ」は生活・営為・祭祀をひろく包み込みつつ、前首の「経綸」を背後に響かせ、糸＝織りの連想を帯びた掛詞的な厚みを持つ。ゆえに本首の力点は、世界記述そのものよりも、声・情動・営みを一本の流れとして聞き取らせる規範的配置にある。

発話媒介行為（perlocutionary）として期待されるのは、理解だけではなく、身心の調律である。「いや栄えぬる」の完了・結果は、すでに成っている繁栄の相を告げながら、なお増しゆく余勢を残すため、読み手の内に安堵・昂揚・帰依・実践志向を同時に起こしうる。言霊は、単なる観念としてではなく、呼吸・拍子・所作にまで及ぶ流れとして受け取られる。大御親の御情動が世の営みに折り返されるとき、道歌は説明文から離れ、場をいや栄えへ向けて傾ける働きそのものとなる。

七十五と百八の折り返し：言語共同体・実践共同体・ピジン・クレオール・武産合気

この挿入は、直訳的同一視ではなく、解釈的な接続として置くのがいちばん強い。AN 4:199（Sujato, n.d.）の「百八の渇愛」は、内十八・外十八の渇愛の言表路が過去・未来・現在へ展開した総数として示され、社会言語学でいう実践共同体は継続的な共通営為によって立ち上がる。ピジンとクレオールも、反復される接触の場から生起・定着する言語形態として理解できる。

本首の「七十五」＝固定総数ではない。言語共同体ごと、また言語共同体を横切る実践共同体ごとに立ち上がる音韻・形態・語法・韻律の生成座標である。大御親＝生成根、七十五ツ＝その根の局所配列、世のいとなみ＝局所配列が生活・労働・祭祀・技法へ流れ込んだ相。ピジン＝接触圧のもとで立つ最小可動の橋、クレオール＝その橋が住まいとなって自前の拍・語法・文法を獲得した相。ゆえにここでの「七十五」＝音素表の固定数ではなく、世界形成へ参与する可動域の象徴数となる。

これに対して AN 4:199 の「百八」＝内十八・外十八の渇愛の言表路が三世へ展開した絡まりの数である。したがって、百八＝無明が音と意味を自己執着へ折り曲げる配置、という読みに立つ。道歌へ折り返せば、御情動＝流れの原相、いや栄えぬる＝整流された帰結である。七十五＝生成の開き、百八＝生成の捩れ。おなじ声位の束であっても、折れかたしだいで弥栄にも拘束にも転ずる。

武産合気＝その折りを生成へ返す働きである。言語共同体＝声の器、実践共同体＝用法の炉、ピジン＝遭遇の即興、クレオール＝反復された即興の定着。第一・二句「大御親／七十五ツの」→第四句「世のいとなみは」、第三句「御情動に」→第五句「いや栄えぬる」という折りは、そのまま保持される。すなわち、共同体ごとの声位配列が世の営みに移り、情動の流れが百八の結節へ落ちるか、弥栄の伸びへ開くかの岐路となる。武産合気とは、各言語共同体・各実践共同体・各ピジン・各クレオールにおいて、その都度生まれる声と技を、無明の絡まりではなく生成の流れへ折り返すことにほかならない。

コーダ

七十五の声は、数え終えることのできる音の目録ではない。それは、大御親の御情動が声となり、声が呼吸となり、呼吸がことば・技・祭り・暮らしのいとなみへ移ってゆく、生成の可動域である。だから結句「いや栄えぬる」は、繁栄の完成を告げて閉じるのではない。連体形終止によって、すでに成った弥栄を、なお成りつづける弥栄へ手渡している。完了は終点ではなく、次の生成が立ち上がるための折り目となる。

その折り目に、読み手自身の声が置かれる。本首は言霊について説明するだけの歌ではない。「大御親」「七十五ツ」「御情動」「世のいとなみ」「いや栄えぬる」と発声することによって、声を情動へ、情動を営みへ、営みを弥栄へ運ぶ働きを、その場でもう一度行う。語る者は世界の外側から繁栄を報告するのではない。どのように息を継ぎ、どこで声を折り返し、どのような関係へその声を渡すかによって、世のいとなみそのものに参与する。道歌は言霊を対象として数えるのではなく、自ら言霊として働くのである。

ゆえに七十五は、一つの言語だけに閉じた神聖な音表ではない。あらゆる言語共同体、実践共同体、そしてその交差に生まれるピジンやクレオールにも、それぞれ固有の「七十五」がある。出会いの圧力のなかで生まれた声が橋となり、反復され、住まわれ、やがて自らの拍・語法・文法を持つ。その生成は、根源の声が局所的な世界として立ち上がる一つの相である。しかし同じ声は、自己執着へ折れれば百八の結び目となり、他者を閉じ込め、世界を狭めることもできる。武産合気とは、声の差異を消すことではなく、その折れを無明の拘束から生成の流れへ返す働きである。

その働きは、壮大な宇宙論の彼方にだけあるのではない。一声、一息、一歩、一手、ひとつの呼びかけと応答のうちにある。草薙ののりによって濁りを澄まし、天地を一つの家として受け取り、七十五の声の織りを思い出し、その御情動を次の関係へ流し入れる。そのとき、弥栄は大御親から授けられた遠い結果ではなく、いまここで私たちが声と身をもって継ぐ営みとなる。では、これから発するこの一声を、私たちはどこへ折り返すのだろう――百八の結び目へか、それとも、まだ名もない世界の弥栄へか。

English Translation

Commentary

Dōka 119 on this page reads:

Ōmioya / nanaso itsutsu no / gojōdō ni / yo no itonami wa / iya sakae nuru
(大御親／七十五ツの／御情動に／世のいとなみは／いや栄えぬる)

Through the seventy-five august affective movements of the Great August Parent, the workings of the world have come to flourish ever more.

Here, the poem declares that the seventy-five august affective movements generated by Ōmioya (大御親), the Great August Parent—the divinity’s “feeling/motion”—carry the workings of the world, including daily life, human endeavor, and ritual, toward ever-greater flourishing, or iyasaka (弥栄). Whereas Dōka 118 established, through its “seventy-five sounds,” a matrix of sound as kotodama (言霊)—fifty basic sounds, twenty voiced sounds, and five semi-voiced sounds—the present poem shifts its focus to the “movement,” or flow, of those voices: affective motion. Its range consequently widens from sound, to movement, to flourishing. The grammar reinforces this progression. The particle ni (に) joins cause to result, while the perfective-resultative -nuru (ぬる) strongly establishes that the world’s workings “have flourished” or “stand in a state of flourishing.”

Read through Morihei Ueshiba’s Six Primers, the design becomes clear. Primer One, Bu = Uchū Genri (武＝宇宙原理)—Bu as Cosmic Principle—provides the underlying premise: the cosmic sound-positions of the “seventy-five,” as kotodama, drive the order of the world when they arise as august affective movement. Primer Three, Shin-kon Ichinyo (心魂一如)—Heart-mind and Spirit, Inseparable—moves voice or word, body or technique, and heart-mind or intention within a single beat, establishing the core through which feeling passes immediately into action. Primer Two, Hito to no Aiki (人との合気)—Aiki with Others—provides the entry through which those affective movements are brought into accord with another through breath, interval, and language. Primer Four, Wagō Bika (和合美化)—Harmonization and Beautification—takes as its standard not words and actions that break the field apart, but those that reweave it toward ever-greater flourishing. Primer Five, Karada/Tai = Dōjō, Kokoro = Shugyōsha, Shugyōsha, Manabite (体＝道場、心＝修業者／修行者／学び手)—Body as Dōjō, Heart-mind as Practitioner, Ascetic, Learner—provides the measure by which each voice, breath, and hand is polished as the smallest unit of flow in practice. Primer Six, Shiai no Minamoto ni Shitagau (「至愛」の源に順う)—following the source of “supreme love”—is the highest-order criterion for deciding which affective movement should be given resonance. It requires that the current received be used in a direction consonant with love.

A single thread also passes through the three preceding poems. Dōka 116 presents “the techniques of Aiki as the law of Kusanagi,” aiki no waza wa Kusanagi no nori (合気の技＝草薙ののり), establishing the norm or law by which turbidity is cut away and the path protected. Dōka 117 gives the coordinates of “Heaven and Earth as the single household created by the Lord,” tenchi wa Shu no tsukurishi ikka (天地＝主の造りし一家), teaching that the world is to be regarded as one home. Dōka 118 presents the primal image of sound weaving the world: “through the seventy-five voices, the ordering-weave is bestowed,” nanaso itsutsu no koe de keirin o tamau (七十五の声で経綸を賜う). Receiving these, Dōka 119 sings the stage at which “voice” becomes “a flow of affective movement” and sets the workings of the single household—the world—in motion toward iyasaka. In practice, this means clarifying word and deed by the law of Kusanagi in Dōka 116; forming relationship as children of the same household in Dōka 117; remembering the weave of voices in Dōka 118; and, in Dōka 119, pouring the “movement” of those voices into breath and technique. At that moment, each voice, beat, and gesture of aiki becomes a small point of origin from which the workings of the world may be carried toward ever-greater flourishing.

In a single colloquial sentence

“Through the seventy-five august affective movements of the Great August Parent, the workings of this world continue to flourish ever more.”

Poetic supplement: The honorific go- overflowing the waist line, and iyasaka unfolding from noun into verb

The third line of a tanka has traditionally also been called the “waist line,” or koshi-ku (腰句). In this poem, that waist line, gojōdō ni (御情動に), is not only the semantic hinge; it also swells by an actual beat beyond the expected meter. More precisely, jōdō ni (じょうどうに) divides into five morae—jo–u–do–u–ni (じょ・う・ど・う・に)—so the single mora that directly overflows the form is the honorific prefix go- (ご―) itself. In other words, the metrical excess is produced not simply by “affective movement,” but by the honorific that sacralizes it. The two long vowels gently extend the waist line, and the addition of the single beat go- causes reverence for the divinity to press outward against the vessel of the meter. The voiced sounds go, jo, and do (ご・じょ・ど) are also concentrated in this third line, forming a heavy tonal nucleus absent from the other four lines. The august affective movement does not move only as meaning: it voices, enlarges, and sets the very “waist” of the poem in motion. The traditional name koshi-ku makes this operation sound all the more bodily.

This one-beat disruption is not simply abandoned. The kami-no-ku (上の句), the upper stanza, departs slightly from the norm in its five-seven-six pattern, whereas the shimo-no-ku (下の句), the lower stanza, returns exactly to seven-seven in yo no itonami wa / iya sakae nuru (世のいとなみは／いや栄えぬる). The fourth line is a noun phrase that raises the topic; the fifth is the predicate that receives it. Together, the lower stanza forms a balanced, two-member structure of topic and predication. It is not parallelism in the strict sense, yet it possesses a responsive equilibrium, as though the first seven morae suspended a question and the final seven returned the result. The poem’s rhythm therefore does not merely become irregular in the third line; it proceeds from disrupted measure into restored measure. The workings of the world receive the overflowing beat of the august affective movement and order its disturbance into the seven-seven form of iyasaka. The extra mora is not a failure of order. It is the initiating motion through which order comes into being.

Further, an easily overlooked feature is that the entire poem contains only one fully inflected predicate capable of completing the utterance: the closing sakae nuru (栄えぬる), “has come to flourish.” Before it appear Ōmioya (大御親), “the Great August Parent”; nanaso itsutsu (七十五ツ), “seventy-five”; gojōdō (御情動), “august affective movement”; and yo no itonami (世のいとなみ), “the workings of the world”—all nouns or phrases centered upon nouns. In particular, jōdō (情動) is a noun, while itonami (いとなみ) is a nominalized form derived from the continuative stem of the verb itonamu (営む), “to undertake, conduct, or carry on.” Only upon reaching sakae nuru does movement finally close the sentence as an inflected verb and an actual event. Put differently, motion is first named inside the abstract noun “affective movement”; it then passes into the action-bearing noun “undertaking”; and at last it is activated as the realized event “has flourished.” This is a grammatical progression from noun, to action noun, to verb, carrying the already-noted dynamic engo (縁語), or field of associated words, to the level of parts of speech. The grammar itself performs the flow proclaimed by the poem—affective movement, undertaking, flourishing—as “movement named,” “movement enacted,” and “movement fulfilled.”

At the same time, Ōmioya, the term occupying the highest semantic position, is not placed syntactically as a subject directly governing the world. As already noted, the upper stanza may be read as Ōmioya [no] nanaso itsutsu no gojōdō ni (大御親〔の〕七十五ツの御情動に): “through the Great August Parent’s seventy-five august affective movements.” The upper stanza containing the divine source is thus marked by ni as cause, mediation, occasion, or field, whereas the topic marked by wa (は) is the lower stanza’s “workings of the world.” Moreover, sakaeru (栄える), “to flourish,” is intransitive. The poem does not employ a transitive or causative construction in which the Great August Parent “makes the world flourish.” The divinity’s august affective movements are not an external agent operating upon the world. They constitute the condition within which—or the current through which—the workings of the world flourish of themselves. Here, the semantic hierarchy of the divine and the syntactic hierarchy of the topic are deliberately displaced from one another. The result is an avoidance of an overtly nominative divine ruler and an intransitive genesis in which flourishing is presented not as something imposed, but as something that arises. Joined to this intransitive construction, the causal force of ni sounds less like a mechanical efficient cause than like a field, occasion, or flow filled with affective movement.

The honorific graph read mi or go (御), placed in the first and third lines, also forms an alternating-line repetition that encloses the upper stanza in the pattern mi—nanaso itsutsu—go (御―七十五―御). In Ōmioya / nanaso itsutsu no / gojōdō ni (大御親／七十五ツの／御情動に), the two honorifics embrace the number from either side, framing the seventy-five not as a bare quantity but as a sacred coordinate of generation. The first honorific creates the reverential title of the source; the third sacralizes the movement proceeding from that source while also adding a beat to the meter. The honorific is therefore not a decorative prefix. It is a poetic force that materially rearranges the composition and sound-count of the upper stanza. Upon entering the lower stanza, however, overt honorific marking disappears. The poem does not place an honorific before the “workings of the world” and simply declare those workings sacred. Instead, the sacredness accumulated in the upper stanza changes form in the lower stanza and becomes the result called “flourishing.” Sacredness is not repeated there as a marker; it is transferred into the world as an operation.

The handling of number also contains a poetic technique distinct from the already-noted allusive significance of seventy-five. The reading given on this page, nanaso itsutsu no (ななそいつつの), does not pronounce seventy-five as a single Sino-Japanese compound. It constructs the number over time as “seventy plus five,” while also filling the seven morae of the second line. The number is broken apart and recomposed in the very act of being spoken. The counter -tsu (ツ) bounds the seventy-five as units that may be counted one by one, but the closing iya (いや), “ever more,” places no upper limit upon increase. The poem thus moves from a countable seventy-five into an iyasaka that can never be counted to completion. One source, the Great August Parent; seventy-five differentiated movements; the collective undertakings of the world; and a flourishing multiplied without limit through iya: this numerical progression through singularity, plurality, totality, and proliferation depicts cosmic generation as a transformation of quantity. At the end of itsutsu (いつつ), moreover, the sound tsutsu (つつ) lies concealed—the homophone of the conjunctive particle tsutsu (つつ), which indicates repetition, continuation, or an action in progress. Morphologically, it remains simply part of the numeral and does not constitute a formal kakekotoba (掛詞). Yet as a secondary acoustic resonance, it invites the ear to hear persistence and progression, allowing even the fixed number to harbor a trace of continuity.

The strangeness of the third line is not exhausted by the contrast between native Japanese and Sino-Japanese vocabulary. In its lexical history, jōdō (情動) is a modern psychological abstraction established as a translation of the English word “emotion.” It has been inserted into the center of a sacral and archaic lexical field formed by Ōmioya (大御親), nanaso itsutsu (ななそいつつ), iya (いや), and nuru (ぬる). The poem is therefore not uniformly pseudo-archaic. It contains a kokin konkō (古今混淆), a mingling of ancient and modern, in which archaic ritual language and modern psychological terminology meet inside the same waist line. “Affective movement” possesses the hardness of a word arriving from outside the traditional poetic lexicon, yet the addition of the honorific go- reconstitutes it as the cosmological language of norito (祝詞). A term of modern psychology is repurposed to speak of divine transformation; that term in turn produces both the extra mora and the concentration of voiced sounds. The third line consequently becomes the center of defamiliarization on three levels at once: lexical history, meter, and timbre. At the center of a poem about seventy-five voices stands a voice that has come from another historical community.

Beneath the semantic field of movement established by “affective movement—undertaking—flourishing,” there also lies a genealogical field of associated words. Mioya may be written as Mioya (御親), “august parent,” but it may also be written Mioya (御祖), “august ancestor” or “ancestral deity/kami.” The written form Ōmioya (大御親) thus presents the Parent to the eye, while its sound allows the ancestral source Ōmioya (大御祖) to appear as a superimposed image. This is less a textbook kakekotoba linking two independent meanings than a margin of ancestral meaning opened when alternate written forms converge upon a single sound. It is followed by yo (世), which can mean both world and generation, and by sakae (栄え), the flourishing of a household, lineage, land, or vegetation. A chain of generation and succession consequently arises: Parent or Ancestor, world or generation, and flourishing. In sound as well, the y-row consonants repeated through oya–yo–iya (おや―よ―いや) stretch a fine acoustic thread from parent to world, and from world to increase.

The verb sakaeru (栄える) signifies not only social prosperity but also the luxuriant growth of plants. For this reason, although the poem appears to name no natural object at all, a vegetal scene lies latent within its final line. The workings of the world do not merely succeed; they are envisioned as sprouting and extending branches and leaves. This is a double mitate (見立て), at once genealogical and vegetal: generations proceed from the Great Parent or Great Ancestor, and their undertakings flourish like plants. Because no explicit flower, tree, mountain, or river is placed in the poem, and because the natural landscape is concealed within the semantic range of a single verb, this is neither an utamakura (歌枕) nor a seasonal scene. It may instead be called a latent landscape, one that retroactively transforms the entire poem into a scene of growth from the closing line backward. The fact that the old graph sakae (榮) contains ki (木), “tree,” as its semantic component supports this vegetal after-resonance from deep within the written form.

In the old-character version printed on this page, yo no itonami wa / iya sakae nuru (世の營みは／いや榮えぬる), an additional correspondence becomes visible in the script itself. According to traditional explanations of their graphic formation, the old forms itonamu (營) and sakaeru (榮) both contain an abbreviated form of the phonetic element kei (熒), although the former takes a building-related semantic component and the latter takes ki (木), “tree.” The two graphs are therefore not etymologically identical, but when placed in the consecutive fourth and fifth lines, their shared crown-like form operates almost as a visual rhyme. The ear hears the different native readings itonami and sakae, while the eye encounters the repetition of kindred shapes. Because “undertaking” organizes activity and “flourishing” transforms that activity into growth, the written surface itself displays the metamorphosis from endeavor into prosperity. The original poem, however, writes itonami in kana, so this cannot be asserted as intentional graphic play on Ueshiba’s part. It is more precise to distinguish it as an editorially produced visual engo: an orthographic correspondence made visible only by the edition’s historical kana usage and old-character forms.

The closing line also possesses a more specifically anticipatory function within its already-noted character as a blessing. The poem does not command, iya sakae yo (いや栄えよ), “flourish ever more”; nor does it conjecture a future, iya sakaemu (いや栄えむ), “surely it will flourish ever more.” It says iya sakae nuru (いや栄えぬる), expressing the desired flourishing as an already accomplished result. By celebrating it in the grammatical form of a completed fact rather than using an optative construction, the utterance abolishes in advance the distance between wish and reality. In congratulatory and longevity poems, future long life or household prosperity may be sung in advance through yoshuku (予祝), anticipatory celebration or precelebration. In the same way, this poem does not ask that the world flourish. It gives the world’s flourishing voice as something already accomplished and draws that accomplishment into the present moment of utterance. The perfective nuru does more than close the past. It anticipates the future’s iyasaka in the form of a present completion.

Placed within an even deeper field of precedent, this anticipatory celebration also resonates with the phrase kotodama no sakiwau kuni (言霊の幸はふ国), “the land blessed by the felicitous power of word-souls,” in poem 894 of Book Five of the Man’yōshū. There, the numinous power of kotodama is joined to the felicity of the land. Here, the august affective movements arising from the seventy-five sound-positions are joined to the ever-greater flourishing of the world’s undertakings. This is difficult to call direct honkadori (本歌取り), or formal allusive variation, because no particular phrase has simply been borrowed. It may nevertheless be heard as a cultural resonance in which Ueshiba reconfigures an ancient kotodama formula—the sacred voice or word that blesses and causes a land or world to prosper—through the modern and kinetic vocabulary of “seventy-five,” “affective movement,” and “undertaking.” As kotodama no sakiwau kuni becomes iya sakae nuru yo no itonami (いや栄えぬる世のいとなみ), the efficacy of kotodama expands from an attribute of the land into a dynamic work of world-formation encompassing life, labor, ritual, and technique.

There is consequently no need to add a newly discovered utamakura, makurakotoba (枕詞), formal kakari-musubi (係り結び), or concealed taigendome (体言止め) to this poem. The poetic techniques that must be added are found instead in the transformations taking place within the poem itself. The honorific go- causes the waist line to overflow by a single beat; the disruption of measure is restored within the lower stanza’s seven-seven form; and the “movement” sealed inside a noun is loosened through an action noun until it becomes an inflected verb. The Great August Parent, highest in meaning, does not become a nominative sovereign; the workings of the world flourish intransitively. The bounded number seventy-five opens into the unbounded increase of iya. The modern psychological term jōdō is transformed into divine language at the center of an archaic vessel. The Parent resonates with the Ancestor; the world opens into the generation; and the old graph for flourishing causes an unseen tree to sprout. Finally, the prosperity that would ordinarily remain a wish is precelebrated through nuru as a fact already accomplished. The seventy-five sounds are not merely explained within the poem. They set the body of the poem itself in motion—as the extra beat of an honorific, the voicing of its waist line, the activation of parts of speech, the correspondence of written forms, and the anticipatory blessing of the perfective.

Speech Act Theory

Under Austin’s (1962) distinctions, the locutionary act of this poem lies in the utterance of the proposition itself: Ōmioya no nanaso itsutsu no gojōdō ni yotte, yo no itonami ga iya sakae nuru (大御親の七十五ツの御情動によって、世の営みがいや栄えぬる)—“Through the Great August Parent’s seventy-five august affective movements, the workings of the world have come to flourish ever more.” Yet the propositional content is not laid out as a flat statement. It is arranged through the fold between the upper and lower stanzas. The first and second lines, Ōmioya / nanaso itsutsu no (大御親／七十五ツの), fold onto the fourth, yo no itonami wa (世のいとなみは), bringing the cosmic source into correspondence with the undertakings of the world. The third line, gojōdō ni (御情動に), folds onto the fifth, iya sakae nuru (いや栄えぬる), tracing the path along which the divinity’s “feeling/movement” flows into the resulting iyasaka. No textbook kireji (切れ字) stands exposed at the poem’s center, but the line-final ni acts as a causal hinge, producing a cut while sending kakekotoba-like associations onward into the lower stanza.

As an illocutionary act, the poem does more than explain a cosmology. Through its norito-like declaration, it legitimates and directs the “workings of the world” toward iyasaka. To state that this is so immediately inclines the utterance toward instruction in how the statement is to be received and enacted. In particular, itonami (いとなみ) broadly encompasses life, endeavor, and ritual, while allowing the previous poem’s keirin (経綸), cosmic ordering or weaving, to sound behind it. The word consequently acquires a kakekotoba-like density through its associations with thread and weaving. The poem’s force therefore lies less in world-description alone than in its normative arrangement of voice, affective movement, and undertaking as a single current to be heard and followed.

The anticipated perlocutionary effect is not merely understanding, but the attunement of body and mind. The perfective-resultative iya sakae nuru announces the aspect of flourishing as something already accomplished, yet retains the momentum of further increase. It may therefore awaken reassurance, elevation, devotion, and an orientation toward practice at the same time. Kotodama is received not as an abstract idea, but as a current extending into breath, rhythm, and embodied action. When the Great August Parent’s affective movements fold back into the workings of the world, the dōka leaves explanatory discourse behind and becomes the very act by which a field is inclined toward ever-greater flourishing.

The fold Between seventy-five and one hundred eight: Language communities, communities of practice, pidgins, creoles, and takemusu aiki

This insertion is strongest when presented not as a literal identification, but as an interpretive connection. The “108 cravings” in AN 4:199 (Sujato, n.d.) are presented as the total produced when eighteen internal and eighteen external pathways for expressing craving are extended across past, future, and present. In sociolinguistics, a community of practice arises through sustained participation in a shared undertaking. Pidgins and creoles may likewise be understood as linguistic forms that emerge and become established within fields of repeated contact.

The “seventy-five” in the present poem is not a fixed aggregate. It is a generative coordinate for phonology, morphology, usage, grammar, and rhythm as these arise within each language community and within each community of practice crossing the boundaries between language communities. Ōmioya is the generative root; the seventy-five are the local configurations of that root; and the workings of the world are the forms taken when those local configurations flow into life, labor, ritual, and technique. A pidgin is the smallest mobile bridge raised under the pressure of contact. A creole is the condition in which that bridge becomes a dwelling and acquires its own beat, usage, and grammar. The “seventy-five” is therefore not the fixed number of entries on a phonemic chart, but a symbolic number for the range of possible movement through which language participates in world-formation.

By contrast, the “108” of AN 4:199 is the number of entanglements produced when eighteen internal and eighteen external pathways of craving are extended through the three times. On this reading, the 108 are the configuration through which ignorance bends sound and meaning toward attachment to self. Folded back into the dōka, the august affective movement is the primal form of flow, while iya sakae nuru is its channeled and harmonized result. Seventy-five is the opening of generation; 108 is generation twisted into a knot. Even the same bundle of sound-positions may turn toward iyasaka or toward bondage according to the manner in which it is folded.

Takemusu aiki (武産合気) is the activity that returns that fold to generation. The language community is the vessel of voice; the community of practice is the forge of usage; the pidgin is the improvisation of encounter; and the creole is the settling and establishment of repeated improvisation. The fold of the poem remains intact: the first and second lines, Ōmioya / nanaso itsutsu no (大御親／七十五ツの), pass into the fourth, yo no itonami wa (世のいとなみは); the third, gojōdō ni (御情動に), passes into the fifth, iya sakae nuru (いや栄えぬる). The sound-position configurations of each community thus enter the workings of the world, while the flow of affective movement reaches a fork: it may fall into the knots of the 108, or open into the ever-extending growth of iyasaka. Takemusu aiki is nothing other than the work, within every language community, every community of practice, every pidgin, and every creole, of folding each newly arising voice and technique back—not into the entanglement of ignorance, but into the flow of generation.

Coda

The seventy-five voices are not an inventory of sounds whose counting can ever be completed. They name the generative range through which the Great August Parent’s divine affective movements become voice, voice becomes breath, and breath passes into language, technique, ritual, and the undertakings of ordinary life. The closing phrase iya sakaenuru (いや栄えぬる) therefore does not announce flourishing and then seal it shut. Through its sentence-final attributive form, it passes an iyasaka already accomplished into an iyasaka that is still becoming. Completion is not a terminus. It is the fold from which the next generation arises.

At that fold, the reader’s own voice is placed. This poem does not merely explain kotodama (言霊). By uttering “Great August Parent,” “seventy-five,” “divine affective movements,” “the workings of the world,” and “ever more flourishing,” it performs once again the passage it describes: voice into affect, affect into undertaking, and undertaking into flourishing. The speaker does not stand outside the world and report its prosperity. Through the manner in which breath is carried, the utterance is folded, and the voice is entrusted to a relationship, the speaker participates in the workings of the world themselves. The dōka does not count word-spirit as its object; it acts as word-spirit.

The seventy-five, therefore, cannot be confined to a single sacred table belonging to one language alone. Every language community, every community of practice, and every pidgin or creole arising at their intersections possesses its own local “seventy-five.” Under the pressure of encounter, a voice becomes a bridge; through repetition it becomes inhabitable; and in time it acquires its own rhythm, usage, and grammar. Such generation is one way in which the primordial voice takes form as a local world. Yet the same voice, when bent toward self-attachment, may become one of the hundred and eight knots that confine another person and contract the world. Takemusu aiki (武産合気) does not erase differences among voices. It returns their fold from the constraint of ignorance to the current of generation.

That work does not exist only in the distance of a vast cosmology. It occurs within one utterance, one breath, one step, one gesture, one call and response. The ordinance of Kusanagi clarifies what has become turbid; heaven and earth are received as one household; the weaving of the seventy-five voices is remembered; and their divine affective movement is allowed to enter the next relationship. At that moment, iyasaka is no longer a remote consequence bestowed by the Great August Parent. It becomes the undertaking that we continue here, with voice and body. Where, then, shall we fold the next sound we utter—into the knots of the hundred and eight, or into the ever-increasing flourishing of a world not yet named?

References

Antoni, K. (2012). Kotodama and the Kojiki: The Japanese “word soul” between mythology, spiritual magic, and political ideology. Beiträge des Arbeitskreises Japanische Religionen. http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47042

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Benesse. (n.d.). ぬ（助動詞）活用と識別. Retrieved from https://benesse.jp/kyouiku/teikitest/kou/study/memory/k00709.html

Brower, R. H., & Miner, E. (1961). Japanese Court Poetry. Stanford University Press.

DIGITALIO. (n.d.). じょうどう【情動】精選版 日本国語大辞典. In Kotobank. Retrieved from https://kotobank.jp/word/%E6%83%85%E5%8B%95-79585

DIGITALIO. (n.d.). いとなみ【営み】精選版 日本国語大辞典. In Kotobank. Retrieved from https://kotobank.jp/word/%E5%96%B6%E3%81%BF-434969

DIGITALIO. (n.d.). 世の営み デジタル大辞泉・精選版 日本国語大辞典. In Kotobank. Retrieved from https://kotobank.jp/word/%E4%B8%96%E3%81%AE%E5%96%B6%E3%81%BF-2090707

DIGITALIO. (n.d.). いやさか（弥栄）精選版 日本国語大辞典. In Kotobank. Retrieved from https://kotobank.jp/word/%E5%BD%8C%E6%A0%84-2008690

Greenhalgh, M. (2003). Aikido and spirituality: Japanese religious influences in a martial art (Master’s thesis). Durham University e-Theses. https://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4081/

Karaoğlu, Y. (2022). Japon yeni dinî hareketi Ōmoto’nun İnançları [Japanese new religious movement Ōmoto’s beliefs]. Marife Turkish Journal of Religious Studies [Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi], 22(2), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.33420/marife.1188589

Labrune, L. (2012). The phonology of Japanese. Oxford University Press.

National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics [NINJAL]. (2017). 日本語歴史コーパス 短単位規程集 Ver.1.0（鎌倉時代編）. https://clrd.ninjal.ac.jp/chj/doc/morph_kamakura_v1_0.pdf

NetAdvance. (2018). 「みそじ（三十路）」の「そじ」って何？[第373回]. Japanknowledge.com. Retrieved from https://japanknowledge.com/articles/blognihongo/entry.html?entryid=391

Onido. (2025). 七十五声. In Onipedia. Retrieved from https://onipedia.info/wiki/%E4%B8%83%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%94%E5%A3%B0

Shimazu, N. (n.d.). Mikoto. In Encyclopedia of Shinto [EOS]. Retrieved October 16, 2025, from https://d-museum.kokugakuin.ac.jp/eos/detail/?id=9949

Shirane, H. (2005). Classical Japanese: A grammar. Columbia University Press.

Shirane, H. (2007). Classical Japanese Reader and essential dictionary. Columbia University Press.

Stalker, N. K. (2007). Prophet motive: Deguchi Onisaburō, Ōmoto, and the rise of new religions in imperial Japan. University of Hawai‘i Press.

Stein, J. B. (2024). Religion, ki, and Aikidō: From pre‑war Japan to the post‑war United States. Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies, 16(1), 194–222.

Sujato, B. (Trans.). (n.d.). Taṇhā sutta: Craving (AN 4.199). SuttaCentral. https://suttacentral.net/an4.199/en/sujato

Tanka‑Textbook.com. (2022). Tanka metrics; allowance for ji‑amari. https://tanka-textbook.com/jiamari-jitarazu/

Ueshiba, M. (1977). 合気道奥義（道歌）(S. Abe, Ed.). 阿部, 醒石. Retrieved from  http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yp7h-td/douka.htm

Vovin, A. (2003). A reference grammar of classical Japanese prose. RoutledgeCurzon.

Wixted, J. T. (2010). A handbook to classical Japanese. Cornell East Asia Series.

Young, R. F. (1988). From Gokyō‑dōgen to Bankyō‑dōkon: A study in the self‑universalization of Ōmoto. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 15(4), 307–329. 

Appendix I: Change Modification Log

06 AUG 26 - Updated with additional poetics analysis; cleaned up formatting; added English translation of commentary; added codas to Japanese and English commentaries.
22 MAY 26 - Added Speech Act Analysis; updated citation style; added an addendum to clarify application to different language communities, communities of practice, pidgins, and creoles.
21 DEC 25 - Phase V styling applied to waka.
20 NOV 25 - Phase IV completion; commentary added.
16 OCT 25 - Phase III completion.
14 APR 20 - Initial notes transferred.