修行会

解説

この第163首は、「よろづすぢ／限り知られぬ／合気道／世を開くべく／人の身魂に」という配列そのものがメッセージになっている。上の三句は、無数の「筋（すじ）」＝力線・理路・縁（えにし）の通い路を掲げ、その果てが測れない（限り知られぬ）ことを宣言し、名指しの合気道を「道」＝方法／路として中枢に据える。下の二句は、「世を開くべく」というテロス（目的句）を示してから、「人の身魂に」と場の帰着点をからだ‐たま（身魂）に落とし込む。結語を〈世界〉ではなく〈身魂〉に置くことで、読後に広がる余韻（よいん）を残しつつ、「世界を開く無数の筋」は、今ここの身体に立ち現れると教える構図だ。

ここでいう筋（すじ）は、点（ポイント）に収束する一本の矢印ではない。全身の面（プレーン）と場の場（フィールド）に張りめぐらされた「無数の線分／経路／理路」が、触れ方・間合い・息づかいの中で同時多点的に立ち上がる、という含意がある。シリーズ前半でしつこく確認してきた「非点状（non‑pointedness）」—中に立つことは一点の刺し込みではなく面と面の媒（なかだち）だ、という作法—は、ここで「萬筋」として大書きし直された、と読むべきだろう。つまり合気の「結び」は、点の一致ではなく線と線を編み直す織りの営みであり、その織りが身魂において無際限に展開する、ということだ。

植芝盛平の六つのプライマーに糸戻ししてみよう。プライマーの第一原理〈武＝宇宙原理〉：萬筋は宇宙の秩序線—天・地・人に通う拍—として受け取る。プライマーの第二原理〈人との合気〉：出会いのたびに相手と場の線を見分け、衝突ではなく編み直しとして結ぶ。プライマーの第三原理〈心魂一如〉：声・息・身の三筋を同一拍に整え、一本化した「一」が無数の「万」へ自然にひらく身体をつくる。プライマーの第四原理〈和合美化〉：「世を開くべく」を美の基準とし、力線の処理を場の明るさに返す。プライマーの第五原理〈体＝道場／心＝学び手〉：身魂にと詠む以上、道場の一手一息を「無数の筋」を聴き分ける稽古にする。プライマーの第六原理〈「至愛」の源に順う〉：線の編み直しは生かす方向（開くべく）に向いているか—ここが常の照らしだ。

直前の三首もこの一句に集約して注ぎこまれる。第160首は「御言（命もて）により、勝速日が立つ浮橋」を示し、「立ち位＝媒」を確定した。第161首は「嘆き」を見切り、神の怒りを浄化の火に転じて勇みつと踏み出す転轍を置いた。第162首は「呼びさませ／一人に心せよ／一を以て万に当る」で原理「一」の運用を定めた。これらを請けた第163首は、浮橋の立ち位（第160首）×浄化された決意（第161首）×「一→万」の運転（第162首）を、「萬筋／限り知られぬ」という非点状の全域運用へ拡張し、しかも「身魂に」と現前の身体へ置き直す。ここで「世界を開く」は外へ出るスローガンではなく、からだ‐たまの織りが世界を開くという内‐外同時の作法になる。

そしてこの首は、宣言し切らない。「…世を開くべく／人の身魂に」で止めることで、余白にひらく余韻を残す。限り知られぬものを言い切らないのは、合気は無限という自覚ゆえだ。私たちができるのは、無数の筋を聴き、編み、澄ませ、また編むこと—点でなく線、線でなく織り。こうして身魂の場で世界は静かに開きつづける。ここに到ってもなお、次の一手は読み手・稽古人に委ねられている。数えきれない筋は限りなく――合気道は、世を開くために、この人の身魂の中にある。

口語要約のひとこと

「よろずの線は限りが知れない――合気道は、世をひらくために、この人の身魂の中で働くんだ。」

歌法補注――三句切れ・縁語・見立て・助詞止め

この首には、すでに見た上句／下句の大きな転換に加えて、まず五・七・五・七・七の定型律そのものが強く働いている。「よろづすぢ／限り知られぬ／合気道／世を開くべく／人の身魂に」は、音数の上ではきわめて素直に収まるが、その中身はむしろ無際限である。つまり、かたちは定型に閉じ、意味は「限り知られぬ」方へ開いていく。ここに、この道歌の第一の妙味がある。定型という器があるからこそ、「萬筋」の無数性は散漫にならず、五句三十一音の内側で、かえって濃く圧縮される。

とくに第三句「合気道」は、三句切れとして読むことができる。厳密な意味での切れ字――「や」「かな」「けり」など――が置かれているわけではない。しかし、名詞「合気道」が第三句に裸で立つことで、上二句の「よろづすぢ／限り知られぬ」をいったん受け止め、下二句の「世を開くべく／人の身魂に」へ送り出す中枢の柱になる。これは一句末の体言止めではないが、中句における体言止め的な据え方であり、詩の腰をここで決めている。上から来る無数の筋は「合気道」という名に集まり、そこから世界を開く働きとして、下へ、すなわち人の身魂へ流れ込む。

縁語もまた、この首の底で静かに働いている。「筋」「道」「開く」は、互いに通路・方向・展開の語群を作る。筋は線であり、理路であり、力の通い道である。道はその筋を歩みうるものとしてまとめ、開くは閉じた道・閉じた世・閉じた身魂をひらく動詞になる。さらに「合」「気」「身」「魂」は、結び・息・身体・霊性の語群を作り、単なる外的な道ではなく、からだとたましいを貫く道であることを支えている。したがってこの首の縁語は、装飾的な連想ではない。語が語を呼び、線が道となり、道が世を開き、世を開く働きが身魂に帰着するという、意味の運動そのものを組み立てている。

また、上二句「よろづすぢ／限り知られぬ」は、広義には序詞的に働いている。古典的な固定句としての序詞ではないが、第三句「合気道」をただちに名指すのではなく、まず無数の筋と測りがたい限界を掲げ、その余勢によって「合気道」という名を呼び出している。名を先に置かず、働きを先に置く。この遅延によって、合気道は一つの流派名や技法名に狭められず、無数の筋を内包する宇宙的な道として立ち上がる。ここでは序の働きが、説明ではなく顕現の手続きになっている。

見立ての面からいえば、この首は合気道を「無数の筋」として見立て、さらに人の身魂を、その無数の筋が宿り、編まれ、世を開く場として見立てている。世界を開くものは、どこか遠い場所にある理念ではない。身魂そのものが道場であり、織機であり、神人交通の場である。萬筋は外界に広がるだけでなく、身の内に入り、魂の内に通い、そこから再び世へひらく。合気道を「道」といいながら、その道を足元の地理ではなく、人の身魂の内奥に置くところに、この首の見立ての深さがある。

結句「人の身魂に」は、体言止めではなく、むしろ格助詞止め、すなわち「に」で止める働きが重要である。「人の身魂」と名詞で閉じれば、意味はまだ安定する。しかし「人の身魂に」と置いて終えることで、歌はそこで完了しない。「そこにある」のか、「そこに入る」のか、「そこに働く」のか、「そこに開かれる」のか――その述語があえて省かれる。だから読者は、最後の「に」の先を自分の身魂で受けなければならない。これは余韻を生むだけでなく、稽古人に向けた実践上の空白でもある。言い切られない述語は、読む者・修する者の一手一息によって補われる。

なお、係り結びはこの首には見られない。「ぞ」「なむ」「や」「か」「こそ」のような係助詞によって結びが変化する構文ではなく、「知られぬ」の連体形はあくまで「合気道」を修飾する働きとして読むべきである。また、厳密な歌枕や枕詞も置かれていない。特定の名所や定型の冠辞によって古典的記憶を呼び込むのではなく、この首は「世」と「身魂」をそのまま舞台にする。地名の歌枕を外に求めず、人の身魂そのものを歌の場所にしている、と言ってよい。

音の上でも、「よろづすぢ」「かぎりしられぬ」「あいきどう」「ひらくべく」「みたまに」と、い音・う音が繰り返し現れる。鋭い「き／ぎ／し／ひ／み／に」の響きは筋の細さ・通り道の感覚を支え、「づ／ぬ／どう／く／く」の沈む音は、無限・道・目的の重さを下支えする。意味だけでなく、音もまた線を引いている。声に出すと、歌は一点に落ちず、細い響きと深い響きが交互に通い、まさに「よろづすぢ」として身の内を走る。

こうして見ると、この首は古典的技法を大げさに飾る歌ではない。切れ字を用いず、歌枕を置かず、枕詞にも頼らず、係り結びの技巧も前面に出さない。そのかわり、定型律、三句切れ、縁語、序詞的導入、見立て、格助詞止め、省略の余白を、ほとんど目立たぬほど自然に働かせている。言葉は少なく、働きは多い。まさに「萬筋」の歌である。技巧は見せるためではなく、身魂に通すためにある。だからこの道歌は、古典和歌の型を借りながら、最後には型そのものを「世を開く」稽古の場へ変えている。

発話行為理論

オースティン（Austin, 1962）の発話行為論（Speech Act Theory）から見れば、この第163首は、意味を述べるだけの歌ではなく、語ることによって道を働かせる歌である。発話行為（locutionary act）としては、「よろづすぢ／限り知られぬ／合気道／世を開くべく／人の身魂に」という五句が、無数の筋、測りがたい限界、名指された合気道、世界を開く目的、身魂への帰着を順に置く。しかしその配列は、散文的な説明ではない。第三句「合気道」で声が切れ、上から来る萬筋を受け止め、下へ送る。切れ字は置かれないが、三句切れの働きによって、名はただの名ではなく、上句と下句を結ぶ神枢になる。

発話内行為（illocutionary act）としては、この道歌は合気道を定義し、命じ、鎮め、ひらく。上句／下句の折りは、第一句・第二句の「萬筋／限り知られぬ」を第四句「世を開くべく」へ折り返し、無限性を目的へ変える。さらに第三句「合気道」は第五句「人の身魂に」へ折り返され、道の名が身魂の場へ降りる。ここで掛詞の働きも重なる。「筋」は力線・理路・縁・血脈をひとつの声に含み、「合」は愛の響きを帯び、「道」は通路であり法であり稽古の歩みである。したがってこの発話内行為は、「合気道とは何か」を説明するだけでなく、「合気道として受けよ」という力を帯びる。

発話媒介行為（perlocutionary act）としては、歌を受けた身に、点ではなく線、線ではなく織り、織りではなく身魂の場という感覚が生じる。結句「人の身魂に」は、述語をあえて閉じず、世界を開く働きの終点を空白として残す。限り知られぬ萬筋は外界に広がるだけでなく、身の内、息の内、魂の内へ通い、そこから世へひらく。ここに第163首の発話の力がある。言葉は少なく、働きは多い。声は切れ、折り返され、身魂に沈み、なお開きつづける。

コーダ

この一首が最後に差し出すのは、完成された教義ではなく、なお開きつづける稽古の場である。「よろづすぢ」は数えられる対象ではなく、身の置き方、息の澄ませ方、相手との触れ方のたびに新しく現れる通い路である。だから「限り知られぬ」とは、遠い宇宙の広大さだけを言うのではない。今ここで一歩を出す身体のうちにも、まだ知られていない筋があり、まだ開かれていない世がある、ということでもある。

合気道は、その無数の筋を支配する術ではなく、聴き分け、結び直し、明るい方へひらいていく道である。点を取るのではなく、線を聴く。線を握るのではなく、織りへゆだねる。織りを完成させるのではなく、身魂のうちに澄ませつづける。そこに、武が単なる勝敗を越えて、世界を開く働きとなる可能性がある。

結句の「人の身魂に」は、読者を外へ送り出すと同時に、もっと深く内へ帰らせる。世界を変える道は、遠くの理念としてではなく、この身、この息、この魂の整え方として始まる。萬筋は外界に満ちている。しかしその限りなさを受ける場所は、つねに一人ひとりの身魂である。

ゆえに、この道歌の余韻は静かでありながら厳しい。合気道は、無限を語るための言葉ではなく、無限にふさわしく身を置くための稽古である。世を開くべく――その句は、未来への標語ではなく、今この瞬間の身魂に向けられた呼び声である。

English Translation

Commentary

In this 163rd verse, the arrangement itself becomes the message: “myriad suji / whose limits cannot be known / aikidō / so as to open the world / in the human mitama.” The first three phrases hold up countless suji—lines of force, lines of reasoning, channels of affinity—and declare that their farthest reaches cannot be measured. At the center, the named “aikidō” is placed as dō: a method, a path, a way. The final two phrases first present the telos, “so as to open the world,” and then bring the field of return down into the human mitama, the body–spirit. By setting the closing term not in “the world” but in “the body–spirit,” the poem leaves a lingering resonance after it is read: the countless lines that open the world arise precisely here, in the body of this present moment.

The suji spoken of here is not a single arrow converging upon a point. It suggests instead that innumerable line segments, routes, and lines of reason are stretched throughout the planes of the whole body and the field of the encounter, arising simultaneously at many points through touch, distance, and breath. The “non-pointedness” that has been repeatedly confirmed in the earlier part of the series—the practice by which standing in the center is not a piercing into one point, but a mediation between plane and plane—should here be read as having been reinscribed in large characters as “ten thousand suji.” In other words, the musubi of aiki is not the coincidence of points, but the work of weaving lines together anew; and that weaving unfolds without boundary in the body–spirit.

Let us thread this back through Morihei Ueshiba’s Six Primers. The First Principle of the primer, “Bu = Cosmic Principle”: the myriad suji are received as the ordering lines of the cosmos—the pulse that passes through Heaven, Earth, and Human. The Second Principle, “Aiki with Others”: in each encounter, discern the lines of the other and of the field, and join them not as collision but as reweaving. The Third Principle, “Heart-Mind-Spirit Inseparable,”: bring the three [aggregated] suji of voice, breath, and body into a single pulse, forming a body in which the unified “one” naturally opens into the countless “ten thousand.” The Fourth Principle, “Harmonious Beautification”: take “so as to open the world” as the standard of beauty, and return the handling of force-lines to the brightness of the field. The Fifth Principle, “Body as Dōjō, Heart-Mind as Practitioner”: since the poem says “in the body–spirit,” make each movement and each breath in the dōjō a practice of hearing the countless suji. The Sixth Principle, “Deepest Love’s Source Followed”: is this reweaving of lines oriented toward giving life, toward opening? This is the constant illumination.

The three immediately preceding verses also pour into and are gathered within this one phrase. Verse 160 showed “by the Divine Word, the Floating Bridge on which katsu-hayabi stands,” and established “standing position = mediation.” Verse 161 cut through “lamentation,” turned divine anger into the fire of purification, and set down the switch by which one steps forward in spirited resolve. Verse 162 determined the operation of the principle “one” with “call forth / set your heart on the one person / with the One meet the ten thousand.” Receiving these, Verse 163 expands the standing position of the Floating Bridge from Verse 160, the purified resolve of Verse 161, and the operation of “one → ten thousand” from Verse 162 into a non-pointed, whole-field working: “myriad suji / whose limits cannot be known.” And yet it places this again in the body presently before us: “in the body–spirit.” Here, “opening the world” is not an outward-facing slogan. It becomes an inward–outward, simultaneous mode of practice: the weaving of the body–soul opens the world.

And this verse does not make a total declaration. By stopping at “so as to open the world / in the human body–spirit,” it leaves an after-resonance opening into blank space. That which is without known limit is not spoken to completion because aiki knows itself to be infinite. What we can do is listen to the countless suji, weave them, clarify them, and weave again—not points but lines, not lines but weaving. Thus, in the field of the body–spirit, the world continues quietly to open. Even here, the next movement is entrusted to the reader, to the practitioner. The lines beyond counting are limitless—aikidō, for the sake of opening the world, is within the body–spirit of this human being.

One line colloquial summary

“The countless lines have no knowable limit—aikidō works within this person’s body–spirit in order to open the world.”

Supplementary note on poetic technique: Third-phrase break, associated words, figuration, and particle ending

In addition to the large turn already seen between the upper and lower phrases, the fixed rhythm of five–seven–five–seven–seven itself works powerfully in this poem. “Myriad suji / whose limits cannot be known / aikidō / so as to open the world / in the human body–spirit” fits very naturally in terms of sound-count, yet its content is, rather, boundless. That is to say: the form closes within the fixed pattern, while the meaning opens toward “that whose limits cannot be known.” Here lies the first subtle savor of this dōka. Precisely because there is the vessel of fixed form, the innumerability of the “myriad suji” does not become diffuse; rather, within the five phrases and thirty-one sounds, it is compressed all the more densely.

In particular, the third phrase, “aikidō,” can be read as a sanku-gire, a break at the third phrase. Strictly speaking, no cutting word—such as ya, kana, or keri—has been placed there. Yet because the noun “aikidō” stands bare in the third phrase, it receives the first two phrases, “myriad suji / whose limits cannot be known,” and becomes the central pillar that sends them onward into the final two phrases, “so as to open the world / in the human body–soul.” This is not a noun-ending at the close of the poem, but it is a noun-ending-like placement in the middle phrase, and the poem’s stance is fixed here. The countless suji arriving from above gather into the name “aikidō,” and from there, as a working that opens the world, flow downward—that is, into the human body–spirit.

The associated words, or engo, also work quietly at the base of the poem. “Suji,” “way,” and “open” form a word-family of passage, direction, and unfolding. Suji is a line, a line of reason, a channel through which force passes. “Way” gathers those suji as something that can be walked. “Open” becomes the verb that opens a closed path, a closed world, a closed body–spirit. Further, “joining,” “ki,” “body,” and “soul” form a word-family of binding, breath, embodiment, and spirituality, supporting the sense that this is not merely an external way, but a way that runs through body and spirit. Thus the engo of this poem is not decorative association. It constructs the very movement of meaning: word calls to word, line becomes way, way opens world, and the working that opens the world returns to the body–spirit.

The first two phrases, “myriad suji / whose limits cannot be known,” also function in a broad sense as a kind of preface. They are not a classical fixed jokotoba, but rather than immediately naming “aikidō” in the third phrase, they first raise up innumerable lines and immeasurable limits, and by that remaining force call forth the name “aikidō.” The name is not placed first; the working is placed first. Through this delay, aikidō is not narrowed into the name of one school or one set of techniques, but arises as a cosmic way that contains countless suji. Here the prefatory function becomes not explanation, but a procedure of manifestation.

From the standpoint of figuration, this poem figures aikidō as “countless suji,” and further figures the human body–spirit as the field in which those countless suji dwell, are woven, and open the world. That which opens the world is not an idea located somewhere far away. The body–spirit itself is the dōjō, the loom, the place of communion between kami and human. The myriad suji do not merely spread throughout the outer world; they enter the body, pass through the spirit, and from there open again into the world. Although aikidō is called a “way,” the depth of the poem’s figuration lies in placing that way not in the geography beneath one’s feet, but in the innermost depths of the human body–spirit.

The closing phrase, “in the human body–spirit,” is not a noun-ending; rather, the crucial point is that it ends with the case particle “in/to,” the Japanese ni. If the poem ended with the noun “human body–spirit,” the meaning would still settle into stability. But by ending with “in the human body–spirit,” the poem does not complete itself there. Is it “there”? Does it “enter there”? Does it “work there”? Is it “opened there”? The predicate is deliberately omitted. Therefore the reader must receive what lies beyond the final ni in their own body–spirit. This not only produces resonance; it is also a practical blank space addressed to the practitioner. The unspoken predicate is completed by the movement and breath of the one who reads, the one who trains.

There is no kakari-musubi in this poem. It is not a construction in which the ending is altered by binding particles such as zo, namu, ya, ka, or koso. The attributive form in “cannot be known” should be read simply as modifying “aikidō.” Nor are there, strictly speaking, any utamakura or pillow words. The poem does not summon classical memory through a particular famous place or a fixed ornamental epithet. Rather, it makes “the world” and “the body–soul” themselves the stage. One may say that it does not seek an external place-name as poetic ground; it makes the human body–spirit itself the place of the poem.

In sound as well, the poem repeats i and u tones: yorozu-suji, kagiri shirarenu, aikidō, hirakubeku, mitama ni. The sharp resonances of ki, gi, shi, hi, mi, and ni support the sense of fine lines and pathways, while the deeper, sinking sounds of zu, nu, dō, ku, and ku undergird the weight of infinity, way, and purpose. Not only meaning but sound, too, draws lines. When spoken aloud, the poem does not fall into a point; fine resonances and deep resonances pass alternately through one another, running through the inside of the body precisely as “myriad suji.”

Seen in this way, the poem is not one that ostentatiously adorns itself with classical technique. It uses no cutting word, places no utamakura, relies on no pillow word, and does not foreground the craft of kakari-musubi. Instead, it sets fixed meter, third-phrase break, associated words, prefatory introduction, figuration, particle-ending, and the blank space of omission to work so naturally that they are almost invisible. The words are few; the workings are many. It is, exactly, a poem of “myriad suji.” Technique is not there to be displayed, but to be passed through the body–spirit. Thus this dōka, while borrowing the form of classical waka, finally transforms that form itself into a field of practice that “opens the world.”

Speech Act Theory

Viewed through Austin’s Speech Act Theory (1962), this 163rd verse is not a poem that merely states meaning; it is a poem that makes the way work by being spoken. As a locutionary act, its five phrases—“myriad suji / whose limits cannot be known / aikidō / so as to open the world / in the human body–spirit”—place in sequence countless lines, immeasurable limit, the named aikidō, the purpose of opening the world, and the return to the body–spirit. Yet this arrangement is not prose explanation. The voice breaks at the third phrase, “aikidō,” receiving the myriad suji from above and sending them below. Though no cutting word is placed there, the working of the third-phrase break makes the name more than a name: it becomes the sacred pivot joining the upper and lower phrases.

As an illocutionary act, this dōka defines aikidō, commands, pacifies, and opens. The fold between the upper and lower phrases turns the “myriad suji / whose limits cannot be known” of the first and second phrases back toward the fourth phrase, “so as to open the world,” transforming infinity into purpose. Further, the third phrase, “aikidō,” is folded back toward the fifth phrase, “in the human body–spirit,” and the name of the way descends into the field of the body–spirit. Here the working of pivot-words also overlaps. “Suji” contains in one voice lines of force, lines of reasoning, affinity, and bloodline; “ai,” joining, carries the resonance of love; “way” is path, law, method, and the walk of practice. Thus this illocutionary act does not only explain “what aikidō is.” It bears the force of saying: receive this as aikidō.

As a perlocutionary act, the poem produces in the body that receives it a sensation of not point but line, not line but weaving, not weaving but the field of the body–spirit. The closing phrase, “in the human body–spirit,” deliberately leaves the predicate unclosed, leaving the endpoint of the world-opening work as a blank. The boundless myriad suji do not only extend into the outer world; they pass into the body, into the breath, into the soul, and from there open into the world. Here lies the force of the utterance of Verse 163. The words are few; the workings are many. The voice is cut, folded back, sunk into the body–soul, and still continues to open.

Coda

What this verse finally offers is not a completed doctrine, but a field of practice that continues to open. The “myriad suji” are not objects to be counted; they are channels that appear anew each time one places the body, clarifies the breath, and meets another being through contact. Thus, “whose limits cannot be known” does not speak only of the vastness of a distant cosmos. It also means that, even within the body taking one step here and now, there remain lines not yet known and worlds not yet opened.

Aikidō is not the art of controlling those innumerable lines. It is the way of hearing them, joining them again, and opening them toward brightness. Do not seize the point; listen to the line. Do not grasp the line; entrust it to the weaving. Do not complete the weaving; continue to clarify it within the body–spirit. There, bu may pass beyond mere victory and defeat and become a working that opens the world.

The closing phrase, “in the human body–spirit,” sends the reader outward and, at the same time, returns the reader more deeply inward. The way that changes the world does not begin as an abstract ideal somewhere far away. It begins as the ordering of this body, this breath, this spirit. The myriad lines fill the outer world, yet the place that receives their boundlessness is always the body–spirit of each human being.

For that reason, the aftertone of this dōka is quiet, but severe. Aikidō is not language for speaking about infinity; it is practice for placing the body in a manner worthy of infinity. “So as to open the world”—that phrase is not a slogan for the future. It is a call addressed to the body–spirit in this very moment.

References

Academy of American Poets. (n.d.). Tanka. Poets.org. Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://poets.org/glossary/tanka

Asoya, M. (n.d.). Concepts of the Spirit (reikonkan). In Encyclopedia of Shinto [EOS]. Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://d-museum.kokugakuin.ac.jp/eos/detail/?id=8756

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Brower, R. H., & Miner, E. (1961). Japanese court poetry. Stanford University Press.

Carter, S. D. (1991). Traditional Japanese poetry: An anthology. Stanford University Press.

Cynarski, W. J. (2017). The philosophy of martial arts – The example of the concept of Ido. Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Kinanthropologica, 53(2), 95–106.

Bunpro. (n.d.). べく (JLPT N1). Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://bunpro.jp/grammar_points/%E3%81%B9%E3%81%8F

DIGITALIO. (n.d.). 筋（すじ）. In Kotobank. Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://kotobank.jp/word/%E7%AD%8B-186214

DIGITALIO. (n.d.). 万（よろず）. In Kotobank. Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://kotobank.jp/word/%E4%B8%87-606000

DIGITALIO. (n.d.). 身魂. In Kotobank. Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://kotobank.jp/word/%E8%BA%AB%E9%AD%82-537486

Frellesvig, B. (2010). A history of the Japanese language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778322

Goldsbury, P. (2012, July 22). Touching the absolute: Aikido vs. religion and philosophy (1). Aikido Journal.

Green, T. A., & Svinth, J. R. (Eds.). (2003). Martial arts in the modern world. Praeger.

Greenhalgh, M. (2003). Aikido and spirituality: Japanese religious influences in a martial art (Master’s thesis). Durham University e-Theses. https://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4081/

Hardacre, H. (2017). Shinto: A history. Oxford University Press.

Horton, H. M. (2018). Making it old: Premodern Japanese poetry in English translation. Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies, 5(2), 110–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/23306343.2018.1500980

Kanshūdō. (n.d.). ぬ (negative). Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://www.kanshudo.com/grammar/%E3%81%AC_negative

Mikiko, N. (1995). Magic and self‑cultivation in a new religion: The case of Shinnyoen (P. L. Swanson, Trans.). Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 22(3/4). (Original work published 1993) https://www.jstor.org/stable/30234457

Miner, E. (1982). An introduction to Japanese court poetry. Stanford University Press.

NihongoMaster. (n.d.). べく (beku). In Japanese grammar dictionary. Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://www.nihongomaster.com/japanese/dictionary/word/106636/beku-%E3%81%B9%E3%81%8F

Pranin, S. (2002, August 2). Morihei Ueshiba and Onisaburō Deguchi. Aikido Journal. https://aikidojournal.com/2002/08/02/morihei-ueshiba-and-onisaburo-deguchi/

Shirane, H. (2005). Classical Japanese: A grammar. Columbia University Press.

Shohei Juku Aikido Canada. (2022, January). Newsletter, p. 2. https://shoheijuku.com/docs/newsletter/2022-01SJACNewsletter.pdf

Stalker, N. K. (2008). Prophet motive: Deguchi Onisaburō, Ōmoto, and the rise of new religions in imperial Japan. University of Hawaiʻi Press.

Terrone, A. (2020). Mind and body in budo: Poems of the Way. Spirituality Studies, 6(1), 45–58.

Ueshiba, M. (1977). 合気道奥義（道歌）(S. Abe, Ed.). 阿部, 醒石. Retrieved from  http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yp7h-td/douka.htm

Vovin, A. (2003). A reference grammar of classical Japanese prose. RoutledgeCurzon.

Yonei, T. (n.d.). Aramitama. In Encyclopedia of Shinto [EOS]. Kokugakuin University. Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://d-museum.kokugakuin.ac.jp/eos/detail/?id=9012

Yonei, T. (n.d.). Tama. In Encyclopedia of Shinto [EOS]. Kokugakuin University. Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://d-museum.kokugakuin.ac.jp/eos/detail/?id=8644

Appendix I: Change Modification Log

14 JUN 26 - Updated formatting, citation style; added additional poetic analysis; added Speech Act Theory analysis; added English translation; added Codas in Japanese and English.
15 JAN 26 - Updated with additional notes on suji, sujioya, and michibiki no oyako (Mikiko, 1993/1995).
21 DEC 25 - Applied Phase V styling to waka.
11 DEC 25 - Phase IV completion; commentary added; will clean up repetition in Phase V.
23 NOV 25 - Phase IV preparation.
19 OCT 25 - Phase III complete.
14 APR 20 - Initial notes transferred.