修行会

解説

第39首は原文「道のため／まがれる敵を／よびさまし／言むけすすめ／愛の剣に」を掲げ、批判的口語訳にすれば――「道（みち）のために、道から外れた敵を呼び覚まし、言葉で向け直して励まし、“愛の剣”へ（によって）導け」――という勧告だよ。ページの語注は、まがれるを「曲がった／道を外れた」の古用、よびさましを「呼び起こす」の連用形、言むけすすめ（＝言向け勧め）を『古事記』以来の言向け和す＝言葉による転回・和らぎと説明し、結語の愛の剣を「破壊ではなく調和へ向ける剣」、さらに句末「〜に」の余韻（方向／手段の開放）まで押さえている。ポイントは、滅ぼすのでなく“呼び覚ます→言で向ける→励ます”という段取りで、剣＝決断を愛＝至善の働きへと束ね直す設計にある、ということだ。

植芝盛平の六つのプライマーに糸戻しすると位置づけが鮮明になる。プライマーの第一原理〈武＝宇宙原理〉は冒頭の「道のため」という倫理座標そのもの、プライマーの第二原理〈人との合気〉は「よびさまし／言向け」の対人運用を裏打ちする。プライマーの第三原理〈心魂一如〉があるから語（ことば）と所作がずれず、プライマーの第四原理〈和合美化〉は言で転回させる＝壊さず整えるというテロスを定める。プライマーの第五原理〈体＝道場、心＝修業者／修行者心／学び手〉は“呼び覚ましと言向け”を日々の最小単位で鍛える秤となり、プライマーの第六原理〈「至愛」の源に順う〉は「愛の剣」の中核（裁断の力を“愛”へ服属させる）を与える。したがって本ページは、原理→関係→一如→美→日常→至愛の六段を、呼び覚ます／言で向ける／励ます／愛の剣という実践動詞に圧縮して示している。

さらに直前三首にも自然に接続する。第36首は行き詰まりのたび「いづ×みづ（厳×瑞）の道」へ還れと教え、ここでは厳＝剣の決断／瑞＝言で和らげ導くとして二相を合一させる。第37首は「心の駒の手綱をゆるすな」と戒め、言向けを粗忽な激情に沈ませない自己統御を前提化する。第38首は「右＝陽に示し／左＝陰に返して導け」で見せる・受けるの配電を定め、本首の「呼び覚ます→言で向ける→励ます」を見せ（陽）／受け（陰）の手順に落としてくれる。つまり第39首は、その場の敵意を“言葉と愛の剣”で正道へ返すという合気の核心を、直前三首とプライマー群の秤で検証可能な実地の指針として結晶させた一首なんだ。

口語要約のひとこと

「道のため、道を外れた敵を呼び覚まし、言葉で向け直して勧め、愛の剣へ。」

「すすめ」の二重駆動――「道」の縁語的幾何と「愛の剣」への変成

この第39首で、なお拾い上げるべき最も鋭い仕掛けは、第四句「言むけすすめ」の仮名書きなんだよ。「すすめ」は〈勧め〉と読めば、呼び覚ました相手を言葉で励まし、正しい働きへ促すことになる。一方、〈進め〉と読めば、曲がっていた運動そのものを向け直し、「愛の剣に」向かって前進させることになる。前者は「呼び／言」という発話の縁語場に属し、後者は「道／まがれる／向け／に」という方向と移動の縁語場に属する。つまり一つの「すすめ」が、言葉による勧告と、身体・心・気の進路変更とを二重に駆動しているわけだ。ここを〈勧め〉だけに漢字化すると、呼びかけの意味は残っても、道を進ませる運動の半身が見えにくくなるんだよ。

その掛詞を軸に見れば、一首には複数の縁語群が交差配線されている。第一は「道―まがれる―向け―進め―に」という方向の系列、第二は「呼び―言」という声と言葉の系列、第三は「敵―剣」という武の系列だ。「まがれる」は進路の屈曲、「向け」は方位の転換、「進め」は新しい方向への移動、結句の「に」はそのベクトルの行先・手段・変成先を示す。しかも「まっすぐにせよ」「直せ」とは一度も言わず、曲がりを〈向け〉、さらに〈進め〉るという動詞そのものによって矯正を実演している。正しさを名詞として押しつけるのでなく、曲率を変え、方向を与え、運動を続けさせる――そこに「道」の縁語的な幾何があるんだ。

「よびさまし／言むけすすめ」には、並行法ないし緩やかな対句も働いている。いずれも二つの動作を結んだ動詞群であり、〈呼ぶ―覚ます〉から〈言で向ける―勧め／進める〉へ、声、意識、方向、行動の順に作用が深まっていく。これは意味上の漸層法でもある。漸層法は表現を段階的に積み重ねて作用を強める修辞だが、本首で高まるのは攻撃の強度ではなく、回復へ介入する働きの深さなんだよ。呼ぶだけで終わらず、眠りから覚まし、覚ましただけで放置せず、言葉で向きを変え、さらに新しい道を進ませる。暴力を強めるのではなく、救済の解像度を一段ずつ上げる漸層になっている。

また、この歌は見立てを一つだけでなく連鎖させている。道徳的・霊的な逸脱は「道の曲がり」に見立てられ、迷妄は「眠り」に、回復は「目覚め」に、方向づけは「言向け」に、武の決断力は「剣」に見立てられる。その最後に置かれる「愛の剣」は、剣を武の力全体の換喩として用いながら、そこへ一見相反する「愛」を結びつけた撞着的・逆説的な連語でもある。「愛の」という連体修飾も一義ではない。愛に属する剣、愛に統御された剣、愛が振るう剣、さらには愛そのものという剣までが折り重なる。したがって愛は剣の鋭さを弱める装飾ではなく、何を断ち、何を守り、どちらへ進めるかを決める切先そのものになるんだ。

格助詞の配列にも、もう一つの決定的な変成がある。「まがれる敵を」から「愛の剣に」へ、文法上の重心がヲ格からニ格へ移っているんだよ。結句の「に」は、既出の方向・手段だけでなく、結果を示す格としても読める。すなわち「敵を愛の剣に〔導け〕」だけでなく、「敵を愛の剣に〔なせ〕」という読みまで潜在する。後者では、呼び覚まされた敵は愛の剣によって処理される対象なのではなく、みずから愛の働きを担う剣へと変成する。敵を消滅させるのではなく、その働きの格を変えるのである。人を斬る代わりに、固定された「敵」という文法的位置を斬り開く――このヲ格からニ格への移行こそ、本首の最も深い合気的転回の一つなんだよ。

形式上、「愛の剣に」は厳密な体言止めではなく、格助詞止めないし助詞止めと見るのが正確だ。結句には「導け」「向けよ」「なせ」「よれ」といった述語が置かれず、その働きだけが省略されている。この述語省略によって、「愛の剣に」は行先にも、手段にも、変成の結果にもなりうる。第四句の「すすめ」に本来先行しうる目的句を最後まで遅らせた、倒置的な後置としても働いている。ただし、語や文節そのものが五七の境をまたぐ厳密な句跨りというより、第四句から結句へ統語的な決着を持ち越す意味上の跨句、あるいは懸垂構文と呼ぶ方が堅い。詠み終えても述語だけが到着せず、行為の完成が修行の側へ残されるわけだ。

冒頭と結末の首尾照応も見逃せない。「道のため」と「愛の剣に」は、ともに名詞を「の」で結んだ句を核とし、目的を掲げる初句と、行先・手段・結果を開く結句とで、中央の動詞連鎖を額縁のように包んでいる。「道のため」は初句切れに近い掲題的な間をつくり、まず一首全体の理由を宇宙的・倫理的な道へ置く。口語的に補えば「道のために」となる潜在的なニ格が、結句の明示された「愛の剣に」へ遠く照応するとも読める。初句の目的が、結句で方法・行先・変成先として具体化され、「道」が抽象原理のまま終わらず「愛の剣」という働きへ降りてくるんだよ。

さらに「言向け」は、本歌取りというより、古語一語による本説喚起または典拠的喚起として働く。特定の先行和歌を取り込むのではなく、『古事記』的な言向け和すの世界を、一語の背後に立ち上げる仕掛けだ。これによって現在の敵対場面が、単なる個人間の説得ではなく、荒ぶるものを言葉によって和し、世界の秩序へ帰してゆく神話的行為へ重ねられる。歌枕のように場所を呼び込むのではなく、古層の動詞によって祭祀的な時間と行為を呼び込むわけだ。

そして文語的には、「まがれる」を「まがれ＋る」と切り、四段動詞「まがる」の已然形に完了・存続の助動詞「り」の連体形「る」が付いた形として読む可能性もある。助動詞「り」は四段活用の已然形などに接続し、その連体形は「る」となるため、この読みでは「まがれる敵」は本質的に邪悪な敵ではなく、「曲がってしまっている／曲がった状態にある敵」になる。 状態として曲がったのなら、状態は再び向け直せる。ここでも文法そのものが敵を本性化せず、回復可能な相として扱っているんだよ。

主語も最終述語も明示されないため、呼び覚ます主体は特定の英雄に固定されず、「敵」も外部の対抗者だけに限定されない。道から曲がった心、暴走する気、固定された自己像までが同じ統語的位置へ入りうる。だからこの歌のほんとうの切先は、人を敵として斬ることにはない。「敵」という固定名を斬り離し、曲がった運動を呼び覚まし、言葉で向け直し、愛の働きへ変成させる――そのとき剣は、何を傷つけることなく、曲がりだけを断っているんだよ。

厳密な修辞判定

この一首には、明確な歌枕・枕詞・序詞・係り結びは見出しにくく、結句も厳密には体言止めではありません。定型的な切れ字もなく、切れは初句の掲題的な間と第三句の連用中止によって統語的に作られています。「言向け」は本歌取りではなく本説喚起、「愛／合い」の同音は合気の文脈で反響するものの、典型的な掛詞と断定するより文脈的同音照応とするのが安全です。

編集上は、歴史的仮名遣いの行を 「言向けすすめ（勸め／進め）」 として、本文では仮名を保持し、注で二義を開く形が最もよく働きます。

「まがれる敵」の音韻論的昇華――「-て＋気」の誘う愛のベクトル

この「-て（接続助詞・行為の動的連鎖）」＋「気（生命エネルギー・霊気）」という聴覚的掛詞（aural pivot）の視点を取り入れることで、第39首の景観は単なる敵対者の教化から、未曾有の「動的なエネルギー変容のプロセス」へと一変する。植芝盛平の脳内、あるいはその言霊（ことだま）の響きのなかで、「てき（敵）」という言葉は固定化された「打ち倒すべき対抗者」という名詞を指してはいなかった。それは、先行する行為や状態から次へと休みなく連なっていく「〜して（-te）」という時間的・空間的な連鎖（action chaining）のモーメントであり、そこに「気（ki）」、すなわち宇宙の生命衝動が歪んだまま乗ってしまっている状態を意味する。つまり「まがれる敵（てき）」とは、本質的に固定化された悪なる存在なのではなく、「その瞬間における行為の動的連鎖（-て）と、そこに流れるエネルギー（気）の方向性が、一時的に正道から折れ曲がって（まがれて）暴走している連続的プロセス」そのものを指しているのである。

この聴覚的掛詞を前提に上の句を読み直すと、「よびさまし」という連用中止の持つ意味がいっそう凄みを増してくる。ここで呼び覚まされるのは、敵という人間の固定的な人格というよりも、その「-て＋き（行為の連鎖とエネルギーの結合）」のなかに埋没している本来の純粋な霊性（みたま）に他ならない。歪んだ方向へ「〜して、〜して（-te… -te…）」と盲目的に暴走しかけている運動の連鎖を、「呼び覚ます」ことによってパッと一瞬でニュートラルな原点へと引き戻す。相手の繰り出す攻撃の運動プロセスを、途中で断絶・遮断させるのではなく、その「〜して」という動的な連続性のままこちらの円の動きのなかへと巻き込み、目覚めさせていく合気の体術そのものが、この「てき」という音韻の文法的解体によって鮮やかに描写されているのだ。

そして下の句の「言むけすすめ／愛の剣に」は、その呼び覚まされた「-て＋き」の連鎖に、新たな宇宙的秩序を与えるプロセスとなる。歪みを正された行為の連鎖（-て）と生命エネルギー（気）は、文字通り『古事記』的な「言向け（言葉による調和）」によってその波動を和らげられ、最終的には「愛の剣」という至高の調和のベクトルへと流れるように誘（いざな）われていく。結びの「〜に」という未完の余韻は、まさにその「-て＋き」という行為の連動が、破壊の道具としての剣ではなく、宇宙を創造し美化するための「愛の剣」の働きそのものへと永遠に接続（chaining）され、変化し続けていく開かれたプロセスであることを象徴している。武産合気（たけむすあいき）の本質が「敵の抹殺」ではなく「敵意というプロセスの調和的昇華」であるならば、このスペース・コヨーテ（Space-Coyote, 2026）の提示した音韻論的アプローチは、道歌の文字の背後に隠された、植芝独自の「言霊による身体運動のメタ表象」を解き明かす極めて強力な鍵となるだろう。

発話行為理論

第39首をオースティン（Austin, 1962）流に見ると、まず発話行為（locutionary）は「何を、どう言っているか」の層なんだよ。ここでは語の字面だけでは足りなくて、語順と切れまで含めて働いている。上の句と下の句の折り畳みを見ると、第一・二句の「道のため／まがれる敵を」は第四句の「言むけすすめ」へ折れ返し、道を外れたものに対して何をなすべきかという問いが、「言で向け、勧める」という処方に変わる。しかも第三句の「よびさまし」は連用中止で切れをつくり、終句の「愛の剣に」がその呼び覚ましを、滅ぼす剣ではなく愛に従う剣として包み直しているわけだ。

つぎに発話内行為（illocutionary）は、その言い方によって何をしているかの層だよ。この一首の力点は叙述よりも勧告・訓戒・促しにある。オースティンのいう勢力（force）の面で見れば、中心は「敵を片づける」ではなく、「呼び覚まし、言向け、すすめる」ことなんだ。しかも「まがれる」は、単なる敵性の固定ではなく、曲がり・外れ・禍の気配を重ねる読みに開かれているから、下の句は討滅で閉じず、矯正と和合の方向へひらく。だから「愛の剣」は、暴威の剣ではなく、敵意そのものを断ち切って正道へ返す働きとして立ってくるんだよ。

そして発話媒介行為（perlocutionary）は、その発話が何を起こすかの層なんだ。この歌が狙うのは、読みのあとに「武は滅ぼすだけのものではない、目覚めさせ、向け直し、励ますものだ」という転回を残すことだし、歌の内部では「まがれる敵」が実際に呼び覚まされ、争いの心をほどかれ、「愛の剣」のうちへ導かれることが期待されている。終句の「に」が行先なのか手段なのかをあえて閉じないから、効果もまた詠み終わりで閉じず、長い余韻として残る。そこに、この道歌のほんとうの切先があるんだよ。

コーダ

この第39首は、「敵を愛せ」という柔らかな標語で終わる歌ではないんだよ。むしろ、目の前の存在と、その存在を曲がらせている運動とを混同しないための、きわめて鋭い修行を命じている。「まがれる敵」は本性としての悪ではなく、道から外れた曲率であり、誤った方向へ走りかけた「-て＋気」の連鎖でもある。だから必要なのは、その生命を断つことではなく、すでに続いている働きを呼び覚まし、言で向け、もう一度進めることなんだ。愛の剣は鈍い剣ではない。生きているものを傷つけず、曲がりだけを断てるほど鋭くなければならない。

そして「まがれる敵を」から「愛の剣に」へ移る格の転回は、相手を処理される対象のまま残さない。呼び覚まされた働きは、愛の剣へ導かれるだけでなく、愛の剣そのものへ変成しうる。ここでは勝者と敗者の配置までが切り開かれ、敵意を運んでいた力が、そのまま守り、結び、美化する力へ返されるんだよ。「言向け」は単なる説得の技巧ではない。言葉と身体と心魂とを一つにし、曲がった運動の奥になお響いている道を呼び戻す、祭祀的な働きになる。

結句「愛の剣に」は述語を置かず、歌の外へ働きを残している。導くのか、向けるのか、成すのか――その空所は、次に訪れる出会いのなかで埋められるほかない。怒りに名を与えて「敵」と固定する前に、その曲がりの奥でなお流れている気を聴き取れるか。剣を抜くより先に、言葉そのものを愛の切先にできるだろうか。

English Translation

Dōka 39 presents the original: Michi no tame / magareru teki o / yobisamashi / kotomuke susume / ai no tsurugi ni (道のため／まがれる敵を／よびさまし／言むけすすめ／愛の剣に). A critically informed plain-language rendering would be: “For the sake of the way, awaken the enemy who has strayed from the way, turn that enemy back through words and urge them onward—toward, or by means of, the sword of love.” It is an exhortation. The page’s lexical notes explain magareru (まがれる) as an older usage meaning “bent” or “having strayed from the way”; yobisamashi (よびさまし) as the continuative form of “to call awake” or “to rouse”; and kotomuke susume (言むけすすめ), understood as kotomuke susume (言向け勧め), through the ancient idea of kotomuke yawasu (言向け和す) found from the Kojiki onward—that is, turning and pacifying through words. The closing phrase, ai no tsurugi (愛の剣), is consequently explained as “a sword directed not toward destruction but toward harmony,” while even the lingering final -ni (〜に) is preserved in its openness between direction and means. The point lies in the sequence itself: not annihilation, but “awaken → turn through words → encourage onward.” Sword as decision is gathered back into love as the activity of the highest good. That is the design here.

Its place becomes clearer when the thread is wound back through Morihei Ueshiba’s Six Primers. The First Principle, “Bu = Cosmic Principle,” is the very ethical coordinate announced by “for the sake of the way,” michi no tame (道のため). The Second Principle, “Aiki with Another,” underwrites the interpersonal operation of awakening and verbal reorientation. Because the Third Principle establishes Heart-mind and Spirit, Inseparable, words and embodied action do not split apart. The Fourth Principle, Harmonization and Beautification, supplies the telos: to turn through language is to restore without destroying. The Fifth Principle—Body as Dōjō, Heart-mind as Practitioner, Ascetic, or Learner—makes awakening and verbal redirection a measure to be trained within the smallest units of daily life. The Sixth Principle, Following the Source of Supreme Love, supplies the core of the sword of love by subordinating the power of severance to love. This page therefore compresses the sixfold movement—genri → kankei → ichinyo → bi → nichijō → shiai (原理→関係→一如→美→日常→至愛), “principle → relation → unity → beauty → daily life → Supreme Love”—into the practical verbs of awakening, turning through words, urging onward, and becoming the sword of love.

The poem also joins naturally to the three immediately preceding it. Dōka 36 teaches that whenever the way reaches an impasse, return to the “way of izu × mizu,” izu × mizu no michi (いづ×みづ〔厳×瑞〕の道). Here the two phases are reunited: izu as the sword’s severity and decisiveness, and mizu as the gracious power of language to soften and guide. Dōka 37 warns, “Do not loosen the reins of the heart-mind’s colt,” kokoro no koma no tazuna o yurusu na (心の駒の手綱をゆるすな), establishing the self-command that prevents verbal reorientation from sinking into careless passion. Dōka 38 sets the circuitry of showing and receiving: “Show through the right as yang; return through the left as yin and guide,” migi = yō ni shimeshi / hidari = in ni kaeshite michibike (右＝陽に示し／左＝陰に返して導け). It translates the sequence “awaken → turn through words → urge onward” into a procedure of showing through yang and receiving through yin. Dōka 39 thus crystallizes the core of aiki—returning present hostility to the true way through language and the sword of love—into a practical guideline that can be tested against both the three preceding poems and the scales supplied by the Primers.

One-line colloquial summary

“For the Way, awaken the enemy who has strayed from the way, turn them back through words and urge them onward—toward the sword of love.”

The double drive of susume (すすめ): The engo (縁語) geometry of the way and transformation into the sword of love

The sharpest device still waiting to be recovered in Dōka 39 is the kana spelling of the fourth line, kotomuke susume (言むけすすめ). When susume is read as “urge” or “encourage,” susume (勧め), it means awakening the other through words and encouraging a return to right activity. When it is read as “advance” or “move forward,” susume (進め), it turns the previously bent movement itself and sends it forward toward the sword of love. The first belongs to the associative field of calling and speech, yobi / koto (呼び／言); the second belongs to the associative field of direction and motion—way, bending, turning, advancing, and the directional particle ni. A single susume, in other words, drives both verbal exhortation and the redirection of body, heart-mind, and ki. Fixing it in kanji only as “urge,” susume (勧め), preserves the meaning of encouragement but makes the moving half—the act of setting something forward upon the way—far harder to see.

Once this kakekotoba (掛詞), or pivot-word, is placed at the center, several intersecting networks of engo (縁語), associative words, become visible. The first is the directional series “way—bending—turning—advancing—toward,” michi—magareru—muke—susume—ni (道―まがれる―向け―進め―に). The second is the series of voice and language, “calling—word,” yobi—koto (呼び―言). The third is the martial series, “enemy—sword,” teki—tsurugi (敵―剣). Magareru denotes a curvature in the course; muke changes its orientation; susume continues the movement along a new heading; and the final ni marks the destination, means, or state toward which that vector proceeds. Yet the poem never commands, “Make it straight,” massugu ni seyo (まっすぐにせよ), or “Correct it,” naose (直せ). Instead, correction is enacted by the verbs themselves: turn the curvature and then move it onward. Rightness is not imposed as a noun. Curvature is altered, direction is given, and motion is allowed to continue. That is the associative geometry of the way.

A parallel structure, or at least a loose couplet-like correspondence, also operates within yobisamashi / kotomuke susume (よびさまし／言むけすすめ). Both are clusters that bind two actions together. The movement deepens from “call—awaken” to “turn through language—urge or advance,” passing through voice, consciousness, direction, and action in that order. This also forms a semantic gradatio, a stepped intensification. Yet what rises is not the force of an attack; it is the depth of intervention on behalf of recovery. Calling alone is insufficient, so the sleeper is awakened. Awakening alone is insufficient, so the awakened movement is turned through words. Redirection alone is insufficient, so the movement is urged onward upon a new way. Violence is not intensified. The resolution of rescue is raised one step at a time.

The poem also links not one but several acts of mitate (見立て), imaginative recasting. Moral or spiritual deviation is recast as a bend in a road; delusion as sleep; recovery as awakening; orientation as verbal turning; and martial decisiveness as a sword. The final “sword of love” uses the sword metonymically for the entire field of martial power while joining it to the apparently contrary term “love,” producing an oxymoronic and paradoxical collocation. Even the attributive phrase “of love,” ai no (愛の), is not confined to a single relation. It may mean a sword belonging to love, a sword governed by love, a sword wielded by love, or even love itself understood as a sword. Love is therefore not an ornament that blunts the sword’s sharpness. Love becomes the very point that decides what must be cut, what must be protected, and in which direction movement must proceed.

There is another decisive transformation in the arrangement of the case particles. From “the bent enemy” marked as an object, magareru teki o (まがれる敵を), the grammatical center of gravity shifts to “into, toward, or by the sword of love,” ai no tsurugi ni (愛の剣に). The final ni can mark not only direction and means, but also the resulting state of a transformation. The line therefore contains the latent reading “lead the enemy toward the sword of love,” teki o ai no tsurugi ni michibike (敵を愛の剣に導け), but it may also open toward “make the enemy into a sword of love,” teki o ai no tsurugi ni nase (敵を愛の剣になせ). In the latter reading, the awakened enemy is no longer an object to be dealt with by the sword of love. The former enemy is transformed into a sword that now bears the activity of love. The enemy is not erased; the grammatical case—and with it the status—of that activity is changed. Rather than cutting a person, the poem cuts open the fixed grammatical position called “enemy.” This passage from the object-marking o to the transformative ni is one of the poem’s deepest aiki turns.

Formally, ai no tsurugi ni (愛の剣に) is not a strict taigendome (体言止め), a sentence ending on a nominal. It is more accurately a case-particle ending or particle ending. No final predicate such as “lead,” michibike (導け); “turn,” mukeyo (向けよ); “make,” nase (なせ); or “follow or accord with,” yore (よれ), is supplied. Because the predicate is omitted, the sword of love can remain the destination, the means, or the result of transformation. The line also works as an inverted, delayed goal phrase: the complement that could ordinarily precede the fourth-line susume is withheld until the very end. Yet this is not strict ku-matagari (句跨り), in which a word or phrase itself crosses the five-seven boundary. It is better understood as meaning-level enjambment, or suspended syntax, carrying the grammatical resolution from the fourth line into the fifth. The recitation ends, but the predicate has still not arrived. Completion of the action is left on the side of practice.

The correspondence between the opening and ending should not be overlooked either. “For the sake of the way,” michi no tame (道のため), and “toward or into the sword of love,” ai no tsurugi ni (愛の剣に), are both built around nominal phrases joined by no. The opening announces purpose; the conclusion opens direction, means, and transformative result. Between them, the chain of verbs is held as though within a frame. The first line creates a topical pause close to an initial-line cut, first placing the reason for the entire poem within an ethical and cosmic way. In colloquial syntax, “for the sake of the way” could be completed as michi no tame ni (道のために). That latent initial ni answers across the poem to the explicit final ni of the sword of love. The purpose announced in the first line becomes method, destination, and transformed condition in the last. The way does not remain an abstract principle; it descends into the activity called the sword of love.

Kotomuke (言向け), moreover, works less as honkadori (本歌取り), the borrowing and transformation of an earlier poem, than as the evocation of an authoritative source tradition through a single ancient word. It does not incorporate a particular earlier waka. Instead, it raises behind itself the Kojiki-world of kotomuke yawasu (言向け和す), pacifying and bringing into harmony through words. The present scene of hostility is thereby overlaid not merely with interpersonal persuasion, but with the mythic act of pacifying the turbulent through speech and returning it to the order of the world. Unlike an utamakura (歌枕), it does not call a place into the poem. Through an archaic verb, it calls ritual time and ritual action into the present.

From the standpoint of classical grammar, magareru may also permit the parsing magare + ru (まがれ＋る): magare as the realis form of the four-grade verb magaru (まがる), followed by ru (る), the attributive form of the perfective or continuative auxiliary ri (り). Because the auxiliary ri attaches to the realis form of four-grade verbs and its attributive form is ru, this reading makes “the bent enemy,” magareru teki (まがれる敵), not an enemy essentially and permanently evil, but an enemy that “has become bent” or “remains in a bent condition.” When the bend is a condition, the condition can be redirected. Here again, the grammar refuses to essentialize the enemy and instead treats deviation as a recoverable state.

Because neither the subject nor the final predicate is explicitly stated, the agent of awakening is not fixed as a particular hero, and “enemy” is not restricted to an external opponent. A mind that has bent away from the way, ki running out of control, or a rigidified image of the self can all occupy the same syntactic position. The poem’s true cutting edge therefore does not lie in cutting a human being as an enemy. It cuts away the fixed name “enemy,” awakens the movement that has bent, turns it through language, and transforms it into the activity of love. The sword harms nothing living. It severs only the bend.

Strict rhetorical classification

No definite utamakura (歌枕), makurakotoba (枕詞), joshi (序詞), or kakari-musubi (係り結び) is readily identifiable in this poem, and the final line is not, strictly speaking, a taigendome (体言止め). There is no conventional kireji (切れ字), either. The cuts are produced syntactically through the topical pause of the opening line and the continuative suspension of the third. Kotomuke (言向け) is not honkadori but an evocation of an authoritative source tradition. The homophony between ai, “love,” and ai, “joining” or “meeting” (愛／合い), certainly reverberates within the context of aiki, but it is safer to describe this as contextual homophonic correspondence rather than declare it a conventional kakekotoba.

Editorially, the historical-kana line works best when retained as kotomuke susume (言向けすすめ), with a note opening the two possibilities of susume, “urge” (勸め), and susume, “advance” (進め). Preserving the kana in the text while opening both meanings in the annotation allows the poem’s double drive to remain active.

The phonological sublimation of magareru teki (まがれる敵): The vector of love drawn forth by -te + ki (-て＋気)

Once the aural pivot between the connective -te (-て), which dynamically chains one action into the next, and ki (気), life-energy or spiritual force, is introduced, the landscape of Dōka 39 changes completely (cf. Space-Coyote, 2026). It is no longer merely the correction of an adversary; it becomes an unprecedented process of dynamic energetic transformation. Within Ueshiba Morihei’s heart-mind—or within the resonance of his kotodama—the sound teki (敵) need not point only to a fixed noun meaning “an opponent to be struck down.” It can also be heard as the moment of temporal and spatial chaining expressed by “doing this, and then,” -te, joined to ki, the life-impulse of the cosmos, while that energy remains mounted upon a distorted direction. “The bent enemy,” magareru teki (まがれる敵), then ceases to mean an essentially fixed evil being. It becomes the continuous process in which the dynamic chaining of action, -te, and the direction of the energy flowing through it, ki, have temporarily bent away from the true way and begun to run wild.

When the upper phrase is reread through this aural pivot, the force of the continuative suspension in yobisamashi (よびさまし) becomes even more formidable. What is awakened is not so much the fixed personality of a human being labeled “enemy,” but the original, unclouded mitama (みたま), the pure spirituality buried within that conjunction of -te + ki. A chain of movement is beginning to run blindly in a distorted direction—“doing this, and then doing this,” -shite, -shite (〜して、〜して). To “call it awake” is to return that chain, in a flash, to its neutral origin. The attacking movement is not broken or severed halfway through. While its dynamic continuity remains intact, it is gathered into the circle, awakened, and redirected. The bodily art of aiki itself—receiving the process of an attack without destroying its continuity and folding it into another movement—is vividly disclosed by this grammatical decomposition of the sound teki.

The lower phrase, kotomuke susume / ai no tsurugi ni (言むけすすめ／愛の剣に), then becomes the process that gives a new cosmic order to the awakened chain of -te + ki. The corrected chain of action, -te, and life-energy, ki, is softened and harmonized through the Kojiki-like operation of kotomuke, turning through words, and is finally drawn toward the supreme vector of harmony called the sword of love. The unfinished reverberation of the concluding -ni (〜に) symbolizes an open process in which the linked activity of -te + ki remains connected—not to a sword as an instrument of destruction, but to the continuing creative and beautifying work of the sword of love. If the essence of takemusu aiki (武産合気) is not the annihilation of an enemy but the harmonious sublimation of the process called hostility, then the phonological approach proposed by Space-Coyote becomes a remarkably powerful key. It opens the metarepresentation of bodily movement through kotodama concealed behind the written surface of Ueshiba’s poem.

Speech Act Theory

Viewed through Austin’s (1962) theory of speech acts, the locutionary act is first the level of what the poem says and how it says it. The lexical surface alone is insufficient, because word order and the placement of the cuts also act. Within the fold from the upper verse to the lower, the first and second lines—“for the sake of the way / the enemy who has bent away,” michi no tame / magareru teki o (道のため／まがれる敵を)—fold back into the fourth line, “turn through words and urge onward,” kotomuke susume (言むけすすめ). The question implicit in the first half—what is to be done with something that has strayed from the Way?—becomes a prescription in the second: turn it through language and urge it onward. Meanwhile, the third line, “call awake,” yobisamashi (よびさまし), creates a cut through continuative suspension, and the final line, “toward or into the sword of love,” ai no tsurugi ni (愛の剣に), folds that awakening back into a sword governed not by destruction but by love.

The illocutionary act is the level of what the poem is doing by speaking in precisely this way. Its center of gravity lies not in description, but in counsel, admonition, and urging. In terms of Austin’s illocutionary force, the command is not “dispose of the enemy.” It is “awaken, turn through words, and urge onward.” Moreover, magareru (まがれる) remains open to a layered reading involving curvature, departure from the way, and even the shadow of calamity or distortion, maga (禍). The lower verse therefore does not close in extermination. It opens toward correction and harmonization. The sword of love emerges not as a sword of violent domination, but as the function that cuts hostility itself and returns its energy to the true way.

The perlocutionary act is the level of what this utterance brings about. The poem seeks to leave behind, after the reading, a reversal of understanding: martial action is not merely something that destroys; it awakens, redirects, and encourages onward. Within the scene of the poem, the bent enemy is expected actually to awaken, to have the mind of conflict loosened, and to be guided into the activity of the sword of love. Because the final ni refuses to determine whether the sword of love is the destination, the means, or the resulting state, the poem’s effect also refuses to close when the recitation ends. It remains as a long resonance whose completion must occur in practice. That is where the true cutting edge of this dōka lies.

Coda

Dōka 39 does not conclude as a gentle slogan telling one merely to “love the enemy.” It demands a far sharper discipline: never confuse a living being with the movement that has bent within or around that being. The “wayward enemy” is not evil as an essence; it is a curvature away from the way, a chain of -te + ki whose energy has begun to run along a distorted course. The task is therefore not to sever life, but to awaken the continuity already in motion, turn it through language, and urge it onward once more. The sword of love is not a blunted sword. It must be sharp enough to cut only the bend without wounding what still lives.

The grammatical turn from magareru teki o (まがれる敵を) to ai no tsurugi ni (愛の剣に) refuses to leave the other as a mere object of correction. The awakened force may be led toward the sword of love, but it may also be transformed into that sword. The arrangement of victor and vanquished is thereby cut open; the power that had borne hostility is returned as a power that protects, joins, and beautifies. Kotomuke (言向け) is no mere technique of persuasion. It becomes a ritual act in which word, body, and spirit are made consonant enough to call back the still-resonant way within what has strayed.

The final ni withholds its verb and leaves the poem’s work outside the poem. Lead, turn, make, accord—the missing predicate can only be supplied in the next encounter. Before anger is named and fixed as “enemy,” the living current still moving beneath its curvature must first be heard. The sword of love begins at precisely that instant: not when another life is cut down, but when the grammar of enmity is no longer permitted the final word.

References

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Agency for Cultural Affairs (Bunka‑chō, Japan). (2006). 「現代かなづかいについて」 .

Antoni, K. (2012). Kotodama and the Kojiki: The Japanese “Word Soul” between mythology, spiritual magic, and political ideology. Beiträge des Arbeitskreises Japanische Religionen.

Brower, R. H., & Miner, E. (1961). Japanese court poetry. Stanford University Press.

Cranston, E. A. (1995). Review of Huey, Tō no Hon’in Ajari Tamekane. Monumenta Nipponica, 50(3), 443–452.

Frellesvig, B. (2010). A history of the Japanese language. Cambridge University Press. 

Hara, K. (2001). The word “is” the thing: The “kotodama” belief in Japanese communication (Part 1). ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 58(3), 279–291. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42578117

Hara, K. (2002). The “kotodama” belief in Japanese communication (Part 2). ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 58(4), 408–419.

Heldt, G. (2014). The Kojiki: An account of ancient matters. Columbia University Press. 

Karasudani, T. (2011). 古事記の言—「言向」「言挙」への展開 [The Words of the Kojiki—The Development into Kotomuke (Pacification by Words) and Kotoage (Raising of Words)]. Showa Women’s University Bulletin of Japanese Literature, 843.

Kokugakuin University. (n.d.). 古事記/Kojiki. Retrieved November 7, 2025, from https://kojiki.kokugakuin.ac.jp

Kubozono, H. (2003). Mora and syllable in Japanese. In N. Tsujimura (Ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 31–61). Blackwell.

Labrune, L. (2012). The phonology of Japanese. Oxford University Press.

Nippon Budō Association. (2004). Budō Charter (Budō Kenshō).

Nippon Budokan. (n.d.). Japanese Budō (Martial Ways): Introduction of Budō disciplines.

Pranin, S. (2012, June 6). O‑Sensei’s spiritual writings: Where did they really come from? Aikido Journal.

Shirane, H. (2005). Classical Japanese: A grammar. Columbia University Press.

Shirane, H. (2007). Classical Japanese reader and essential dictionary. Columbia University Press.

Space-Coyote, L. (2026). Hearing te + ki in Ueshiba Morihei‘s Dōka: Continuity 「て」and Vital Spirit 「気」as an aural pivot on teki 「敵」(Print Preview). Shugyōkai, 1(1), 201–204. https://shugyokai.org/325d

Stalker, N. K. (2008). Prophet motive: Deguchi Onisaburō, Ōmoto, and the rise of new religions in Imperial Japan. University of Hawai‘i Press.

Starr, R. L. (2016). The syllable as a prosodic unit in Japanese lexical strata. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.24

Ueshiba, M. (1977). 合気道奥義（道歌）(S. Abe, Ed.). 阿部, 醒石. Retrieved from  http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yp7h-td/douka.htm

Ueshiba, M. (2010). The art of peace (J. Stevens, Trans.). Shambhala. (Original work published 1992)

Vovin, A. (2003). A reference grammar of Classical Japanese prose. RoutledgeCurzon.

Appendix I: Change Modification Log

22 JUL 26 - Updated formatting; added additional poetics analysis; added English translation of commentary; added codas to Japanese and English.
20 MAY 26 - Phase V Speech Acts (Austin, 1962) analysis added in Japanese; updated citation style; added -te + ki aural pivot application analysis.
21 DEC 25 - Phase V styling applied to waka.
07 NOV 25 - Phase IV completion; commentary added.
14 OCT 25 - Phase III completion.
14 APR 20 - Initial notes transferred.