修行会

解説

この第212首「すの御言／五十鈴の姿／いろはうた／大地の上を／正すさむはら」は、合気の“根”を ことば（言霊）の側からはっきり言い当てています。まず 「ス」は日常の仮名というより、宇宙がほどけてくる根源音（kotodama SU）として前景化され（カタカナ表記もそのため）、それが御言（みこと＝神聖な宣言・発語）として立つ。つづく 五十鈴は「五十の鈴」でありつつ、言霊文脈では五十音（ごじゅうおん）の体系＝宇宙の縮図を響かせ、いろはうたは“すべての仮名を一度ずつ含む”総覧として、音の全域を提示します。そして結句の サムハラが 「正す」（ただす＝整える／正す／まっすぐにする）として大地の“上”（表層＝人間社会の現前世界）に作用する、と歌う──ここで合気は、技以前に言霊が世界を整流する働きとして置かれています。

この歌が面白いのは、ここでの“整え”が一点（ポイント）に当てる訂正じゃなく、音のフィールド全体を動員して「地表＝現れ」を正す、と読める点です。五十鈴＝五十音、いろは＝全仮名の配列という時点で、もう視野は単語一個・音一発を超えていて、体系（場）としての響きが世界に触れる設計になっている。さらにページ注が示すように、五十鈴は伊勢の五十鈴川・聖域の地勢（禊・境界の通過）も喚起し、言霊は「言う」より「行う」に近い、**祝詞・呪詞のパフォーマティブ（行為としての言語）になる。だから サムハラは“護符の語”であると同時に、「正す」と結びつくことで、発語＝整流＝禊として働く──このページはそこまで射程を広げて読ませています。

植芝盛平の六つのプライマーの糸で束ね直すなら、プライマーの第一原理（武＝宇宙原理）は スを宇宙の起点音として受け、プライマーの第二原理（対人の合気）は“言霊で場を正す”を人間関係の結び直しへ、プライマーの第三原理（心魂一如）は声・息・身を同拍にして“御言”を空語にしない、プライマーの第四原理（和合美化）は「正す」を矯正ではなく澄明化＝美へ返す基準に、プライマーの第五原理（日々の稽古）は五十音・いろは・祝詞を“暗唱”で終わらせず場を整える反復に、プライマーの第六原理（至愛）はサムハラの護りを生かす方向へ固定する──こう並びます。関連道歌で言えば、第210首「七十五音」や 第160首「御言」、第155首「禊業」、第209首「息を立てる」、第203首「拍子を聡く聞け」が、ここでは “ス→（五十音／いろは）→サムハラ→正す”という一本の回路に収束する。でも最後は、きっぱり言い切らずに余韻が残る。ページの注が示すとおり、この原理は過去・現在・未来の“限りない言語”へも開くからです──合気が無限なら、スの御言もまた尽きません。

口語要約のひとこと

「『ス』という御言と、五十鈴（五十音）といろはの響きで、サムハラが大地の表をまっすぐに整えるんだ。」

和歌技法補説――「ス」をめぐる音の環と結句の二重構文

この歌でもう一段おもしろいのは、「ス」が意味として説かれるだけでなく、音として一首の内部を歩いている点です。初句の「す」は、第二句の「いすず／すがた」、結句の「ただす」へ潜り込み、最後には「サムハラ」の歯擦音へ受け渡される。これは一語に二義を担わせる狭義の掛詞というより、同音反復と子音連鎖による音韻的な首尾照応です。しかも根源音「ス」は「正す」という働きの内部へ戻るため、大地を正す運動そのものにスが含まれていることになる──言霊の展開を説明する以前に、歌の発音がその展開を実演しているわけです。

さらに「すの御言」は、書かれた文字では「スの神聖なことば」と定められながら、声にすれば「スノミコト」となり、神名に添えられる「……の命／尊」という型を同時に呼び起こします。「御言」は神・天皇などのことばをいう一方、「みこと」は神や高貴な存在の名に添える敬称でもあるため、ここでは〈発せられた御言〉と〈御言を発する神格〉とが同じ音の中で重なる。古典的な掛詞は同じ音に二つの意味、あるいは二つの統語的位置を担わせる修辞なので、ここは固定化された歌語の掛詞と断定するより、「御言／命・尊」の掛詞的な聴覚二重化と捉えるのが精確でしょう。既注の「五十鈴」における地名と「五十の鈴」との重なりも、この聴覚的回路へ接続します。

そのうえで「御言・鈴・いろは・うた・サムハラ」は、声・文字・歌・呪詞をめぐる縁語的な語彙場を形づくります。古典歌学上の縁語とは、意味上関連する語を一首の各所に置き、その相互照応によって表現を厚くする仕掛けですが、この歌では一つの古典的景物に従属するというより、「ことばの全域」そのものが縁となっている。そこへ「姿・大地・上・正す」という形態・空間・整序の系列が交差するため、音は音のまま終わらず、形となり、地表へ作用する力へ移されます。とりわけ五十鈴を「五十の鈴」として聴くとき、その「姿」は、聞こえるはずの響きに見える身体を与える共感覚的な見立てにもなる──御言が姿を取り、姿が世界の地勢を正す、という変換です。

統語の側では、上句の「御言／姿／うた」が、接続詞も断定の助動詞も置かず、三つの体言を無接続で並べています。この体言の三段列挙によって、三者は単なる品目の列ではなく、同格の言い換えにも、根源音から形・歌へ至る段階的顕現にも、世界を正す三つの媒体にも読める。また初句「すの御言」、第二句「五十鈴の姿」、第四句「大地の上」という「ＸのＹ」の構文反復が、異なる領域を同じ格子に収めています。第一・第二句では「御言」と「姿」が聴覚／視覚の対句をなし、第四句ではその「姿」が世界の「上」すなわち表面へ拡大されるわけです。

配列全体は、第三句「いろはうた」を軸とする環状構成、あるいは五句の折りとしても読めます。第一句の「御言」と第五句の「サムハラ」はともに神聖な発語、第二句の「姿」と第四句の「上」はともに現れた形・表面を担い、中央の「いろはうた」が音と文字、上句と下句をつなぐ蝶番になる。短歌の第三句は五句体の中央で前二句と後二句を連結し、転換・展開を担いうる位置と論じられてきましたが、ここではまさに「一音としてのス」から「五十鈴」、さらに「いろは」の全音域を経て「大地」へ至る**漸層法（逓増）**の中心を受け持っています。明示的な切れ字はないものの、体言三連から「大地の上を」という対象句へ移るため、「いろはうた」の後には三句切れに近い無標の休止が生まれます。

下句では、第四句を格助詞「を」で閉じることが重要です。「大地の上を」だけでは作用が未完のまま宙づりになり、述語「正す」が結句まで送り延ばされる。そしてサ行四段活用の「正す」は終止形と連体形が同形であるため、結句には二つの構文が重なります。一つは「大地の上を正す。／サムハラ。」と切り、「正す」の後に結句内部の句割れ的な切れを置いて、サムハラを独立した唱え・呼び掛けとして響かせる読み。もう一つは「大地の上を正すサムハラ」と続け、「大地を正すサムハラ」という連体修飾＋体言で閉じる体言止めの読みです。後者ではサムハラが正す主体として立ち、前者ではサムハラという発語そのものが、直前の「正す」を儀礼的に成就させる。明示的な切れ字がないにもかかわらず、活用形の同一性が「切る／続ける」の両方を可能にしているのです。体言止めは、結句を名詞で閉じることで叙述を省略し、余情・余韻を生む修辞とされますが、この歌では余韻だけでなく、呪詞を行為主体へ変える文法的な働きまで担っています。

したがって一首は、冒頭で「御言」が「命／尊」へ開き、結末で「サムハラ」が〈唱えられる語〉と〈正す主体〉へ開く、二重の照応によって閉じられています。言葉が神格となり、神名が動作となる──この歌は言霊について語るだけでなく、音韻・配列・統語の三層を使って、言霊が「ことば」から「はたらき」へ移る瞬間そのものを作っています。

分類上の留保。 定型的な枕詞・序詞・係り結びは、この一首には認めにくいです。上句全体は述語を遅らせる点で「序詞的」には働きますが、特定語を導く古典的な序詞そのものとは区別した方がよいでしょう。また「大地の上を／正す」は第四句末と文節末が一致しているため、「文節の終わりと句の切れ目が一致しない」という厳密な定義での句跨りではなく、第四句末の格助詞「を」による懸垂と述語遅延と記す方が適切です。

発話行為理論

オースティン（Austin, 1962）の区分で見直すと、この一首の発話行為（locutionary／ロキューション）は、単に「ス・五十鈴・いろは・サムハラ」という語を並べることではありません。五・七・五／七・七の音列を発し、日本語の語彙と統語に従って、「スの御言／五十鈴の姿／いろはうた」と「大地の上を／正すサムハラ」を一つの意味連鎖として立ち上げる行為です。上句・下句の「折り」では、第一・第二句の〈XのY〉が第四句「大地の上」へ折り返され、第三句「いろはうた」は第五句「サムハラ」というもう一つの発語へ応答する。前半の音・姿・歌が、後半の地表・正し・呪詞へ重なるため、発話内容そのものが〈音の秩序＝世界の秩序〉という形を取ります。

そのうえで発話内行為（illocutionary／イルロキューション）の核は、この連鎖を説明するだけでなく、宣言し、呼び出し、正しとして働かせることにあります。明示的な切れ字は置かれていないものの、「いろはうた」の後には無標の三句切れが生まれ、第四句末の「を」が作用を結句まで懸垂させる。さらに「正す」は終止形にも連体形にも聞こえるため、「大地の上を正す。サムハラ。」なら独立した唱え、「大地の上を正すサムハラ」なら正す主体を名指す体言止めとなる。この切る／続けるの二重性によって、上句の提示的な力が、下句の宣言的・招請的な力へ転じます。「御言／命・尊」と「五十鈴／五十の鈴」の掛詞的重層も、ことば・神格・全音域を一つに結び、発語の権威と射程を内側から立ち上げています。

そして発話媒介行為（perlocutionary／ペルロキューション）として期待されるのは、音の全域が大地の整序へ折り返される感覚を生み、息・注意・稽古の向きを「正す」方向へ移すことです。第一・第二句と第四句の構文照応は、聖なる根源と現前世界とを同じ格子へ収め、第三句と第五句の発語照応は、いろはの総体をサムハラの一語へ凝縮する。そこから畏敬、鎮まり、護りの感覚、言霊を行として受け取る決意などが生じうる。ただし、オースティンの意味での発話媒介的効果は、語句の中に自動的に含まれる成果ではなく、実際の感情・思考・行為に生じた帰結です。大地が「正された」と歌う内容、正すことを宣言・招請する発話内の力、そこから生じる鎮心や実践への転換――三層は重なりながらも、同じものではありません。余韻に残るサムハラは、意味の終点というより、行為へ移るための発声点になる。

コーダ

ここまで来ると、この一首の終わりは、意味を閉じるための終止符ではなく、響きを現実へ送り返すための余白として聞こえてきます。スから五十鈴へ、五十鈴からいろはへ、いろはから大地へとひらかれた音の運動は、サムハラの一語に凝縮されながら、そこで消えるのではない。むしろ、その後に残る沈黙のなかで、声を発した者の息、姿勢、まなざし、そして次の行為へ移ってゆきます。言霊が真に「はたらき」となるのは、唱えた瞬間だけではなく、その響きが身の内に残り、まだ正されていない世界への応答を促すときなのでしょう。

だから「大地の上を正す」とは、世界を外から裁き、一つの形へ押し戻すことではありません。乱れのただなかで関係を聴き直し、声と息と身体をもう一度同じ拍子へ戻し、現れたものが本来の澄明さを取り戻せる場をひらくことです。サムハラは、その完成を保証する魔法の結語ではなく、正す者自身もまた正され続けなければならないという、静かな戒めとして残ります。

一首が尽きても、スの御言は尽きない。余韻とは、音が消えた後にもなお続く責任であり、残心とは、その責任から耳を離さない姿なのかもしれません。では、最後の一音が沈黙へ還ったあと、私たちはその沈黙のなかに、次に正すべき自らの響きを聴くことができるでしょうか。

English Translation

Commentary

This 212th poem, “The sacred utterance Su / the form of Isuzu / the Iroha song / over the face of the earth / Samuhara sets it right” (su no mikoto / Isuzu no sugata / iroha uta / daichi no ue o / tadasu Samuhara; すの御言／五十鈴の姿／いろはうた／大地の上を／正すさむはら) plainly names the “root” of aiki (合気) from the side of language, or kotodama (言霊). First, Su (ス) is foregrounded not as an ordinary kana, but as the primordial sound from which the cosmos comes unfurled—the kotodama SU. Its katakana notation serves precisely this purpose. It then stands forth as mikoto (御言): a sacred declaration, a sacred act of utterance. The ensuing Isuzu (五十鈴) is at once “fifty bells”—gojū no suzu (五十の鈴)—and, within the context of kotodama, resonates with the system of the fifty sounds, gojūon (五十音), a miniature of the cosmos. The iroha uta (いろはうた), as a complete survey said to “contain every kana once,” then presents the entire range of sound. Finally, Samuhara (サムハラ) acts upon the earth’s “surface”—its visible layer, the presently manifest world of human society—as tadasu (正す): to order, correct, or make straight. Here, aiki is situated prior to technique as the activity through which kotodama brings the currents of the world into alignment.

What makes the poem especially compelling is that this “setting right” is not a correction aimed at one isolated point. It mobilizes the whole field of sound in order to set right the earth’s surface—the realm of manifestation. Once Isuzu is heard as the fifty sounds and the Iroha as the array of all kana, the perspective has already moved beyond a single word or a single burst of sound. The poem is designed so that resonance as a system—as a field—comes into contact with the world. Moreover, as the note on the page indicates, Isuzu also evokes the Isuzu River at Ise and the sacred topography of its precincts: purification through misogi (禊), and passage across a boundary. Kotodama thus becomes less a matter of iu (言う), “saying,” than of okonau (行う), “doing”: the performative force of norito (祝詞) and incantation, language functioning as an act. Samuhara is therefore both a “talismanic word” and, through its connection with tadasu, an operation in which utterance, the ordering of currents, and misogi become one. The page invites the reading to extend that far.

Regathered along the six threads of Ueshiba Morihei’s Primers, the poem unfolds as follows. Primer One, the First Principle—Bu as Cosmic pPrinciple—receives Su as the originating sound of the cosmos. Primer Two, Aiki with Others, turns “setting the field right through kotodama” toward the reweaving of human relationships. Primer Three, Heart-mind and Spirit, Inseparable, brings voice, breath, and body onto the same beat, preventing mikoto from becoming empty speech. Primer Four, Harmonization and Beautification, takes tadasu not as coercive correction, but as a standard that returns things to lucidity—and therefore to beauty. Primer Five, Daily Practice, does not allow the fifty sounds, the Iroha, and norito to end in mere “recitation,” but makes them a repeated practice for ordering the field. Primer Six, Supreme Love, anchors the protection of Samuhara in a life-giving direction. Among the related dōka, poem 210, “The Seventy-Five Sounds”; poem 160, “The Sacred Word”; poem 155, “The Practice of Misogi”; poem 209, “Establish the Breath”; and poem 203, “Hear the Rhythm Keenly” all converge here into a single circuit:

Su → the fifty sounds and the Iroha → Samuhara → tadasu.

Yet the poem does not end with a blunt, final assertion. An after-resonance remains. As the note on the page suggests, this principle also opens onto the “limitless language” of past, present, and future. If aiki is infinite, then the sacred utterance of Su is likewise inexhaustible.

A one-sentence colloquial summary

“Through the sacred utterance Su (ス), the resonance of Isuzu (五十鈴)—the fifty sounds—and the Iroha (いろは), Samuhara (サムハラ) straightens and sets the face of the earth in order.”

Supplementary note on waka technique: The ring of sound around su (ス) and the double syntax of the closing line

What makes the poem still more interesting is that su is not only explained as meaning; it walks through the interior of the poem as sound. The su (す) of the opening line slips into Isuzu / sugata (いすず／すがた) in the second, enters tadasu (ただす) in the closing line, and is finally handed onward to the sibilance of Samuhara (サムハラ). This is less a kakekotoba (掛詞) in the strict sense—one word made to bear two meanings—than a phonological correspondence between beginning and end, created through repeated sound and a chain of consonants. Moreover, because the primordial sound su returns within the action tadasu, Su is contained in the very movement by which the earth is set right. Before the poem explains the unfolding of kotodama, its pronunciation is already performing that unfolding.

On the page, su no mikoto (すの御言) settles into the meaning “the sacred word of su.” Spoken aloud, however, it becomes su no mikoto (スノミコト), simultaneously evoking the naming formula … no mikoto (……の命／尊), such as that attached to the name of a kami. Mikoto (御言) can denote the words of a kami, an emperor, or another sacred authority, while mikoto (命／尊) is also an honorific appended to the names of divine or exalted beings. The same sound therefore holds together both the sacred word being uttered and the divinity that utters it. Since a classical kakekotoba allows one sound to bear two meanings—or even two syntactic positions—it is more precise to hear here a kakekotoba-like auditory doubling between mikoto (御言) and mikoto (命・尊) than to declare it a fixed, conventional poetic pun. The already noted overlap within Isuzu—between the place-name and “fifty bells”—also joins this auditory circuit.

Taken together, mikoto, suzu, iroha, uta, and Samuhara (御言・鈴・いろは・うた・サムハラ) form an engo-like lexical field concerned with voice, writing, song, and incantation. In classical poetics, engo (縁語) places semantically associated words at different points within a poem, thickening expression through their mutual resonance. Here, however, the cluster is not subordinated to a single conventional image from classical poetry. The entire domain of language itself becomes the bond. This field intersects with the sequence sugata, daichi, ue, and tadasu (姿・大地・上・正す)—form, space, and ordering—so sound does not remain merely sound. It becomes form, and then becomes a power acting upon the earth’s surface. When Isuzu is heard as “fifty bells,” its “form,” sugata (姿), gives a visible body to what should be audible resonance. It becomes a synesthetic mitate (見立て): the sacred utterance assumes form, and that form in turn sets the world’s terrain right.

Syntactically, the upper phrase places mikoto / sugata / uta (御言／姿／うた) side by side without a conjunction or a copular assertion. Through this threefold sequence of nominals, the three are no longer merely items in an inventory. They may be read as appositional restatements of one another, as successive manifestations proceeding from primordial sound into form and song, or as three media through which the world is set right. The repeated X-no-Y construction in su no mikoto (すの御言), Isuzu no sugata (五十鈴の姿), and daichi no ue (大地の上) also places otherwise distinct domains within the same grammatical lattice. In the first two lines, “sacred utterance” and “form” create an auditory–visual pairing; in the fourth, that form expands outward into the world’s “upper face,” its surface.

The arrangement as a whole may be read as a ring composition centered upon the third line, iroha uta (いろはうた), or as a fold across the poem’s five lines. The “sacred utterance” of the first line and Samuhara in the fifth are both sacred acts of speech. The “form” of the second and the “surface” of the fourth both belong to the realm of visible manifestation. At the center, the Iroha becomes the hinge joining sound and writing, as well as the upper and lower phrases. The third line of a tanka occupies the center of its five-line structure and has long been understood as a position capable of connecting, turning, or developing the first two and final two lines. Here, it serves precisely as the center of gradatio, an incremental intensification: from su as a single sound, to Isuzu, to the whole sonic range of the Iroha, and finally outward to the earth. Although no explicit kireji (切れ字), or cutting word, appears, the transition from three consecutive nominals to the object phrase daichi no ue o (大地の上を) produces an unmarked pause after iroha uta, resembling an implicit third-line break, or sankugire (三句切れ).

In the lower phrase, it is crucial that the fourth line closes with the object particle o (を). Taken by itself, daichi no ue o (大地の上を)—“the surface of the earth”—leaves the action incomplete and suspended in midair. The predicate tadasu (正す) is deferred until the closing line. Because tadasu, an S-row yodan (四段) verb, has the same form in its conclusive and attributive uses, two syntactic constructions overlap within the final line.

The first reading is:

daichi no ue o tadasu. / Samuhara. (大地の上を正す。／サムハラ。)

Here the phrase is cut after tadasu, creating a caesura-like division within the closing line and allowing Samuhara to sound as an independent chant, invocation, or address.

The second reading is:

daichi no ue o tadasu Samuhara (大地の上を正すサムハラ)

Here the phrase continues without a break and closes through attributive modification followed by a noun: “Samuhara, which sets the earth right.” This produces a nominal ending, or taigendome (体言止め).

In the latter reading, Samuhara stands as the agent that performs the setting-right. In the former, the utterance of “Samuhara” itself ritually consummates the immediately preceding tadasu. Thus, even without an explicit cutting word, the identity of the verb’s two inflected forms permits both “cutting” and “continuing.” Taigendome is commonly understood as a device that closes a poem with a noun, suppressing further predication and leaving behind after-feeling and after-resonance. Here, however, it does more than generate yojō (余情) and yoin (余韻). It performs the grammatical work of transforming an incantatory word into an acting agent.

The poem is therefore enclosed by a double correspondence. At the beginning, mikoto (御言), the sacred word, opens toward mikoto (命／尊), the divine being. At the end, Samuhara opens simultaneously toward a word being chanted and an agent that sets things right. Language becomes divinity, and a divine name becomes action. The poem does not merely speak about kotodama. Through the three layers of phonology, arrangement, and syntax, it creates the very instant in which kotoba (ことば), “word,” passes into hataraki (はたらき), “operative activity.”

Classificatory Caveat

Conventional examples of the makurakotoba (枕詞), or pillow word; the joshi (序詞), or preface; and kakarimusubi (係り結び), or bound construction, are difficult to identify in this poem. The kami-no-ku (上句), or upper phrase, does function in a joshi-like manner insofar as it postpones the predicate, but it is better distinguished from a classical joshi that conventionally introduces a particular word.

Likewise, because the end of the fourth line coincides with the end of the syntactic phrase in daichi no ue o / tadasu (大地の上を／正す), this is not strictly ku-matagari (句跨り), or line-straddling, under the narrow definition in which “the end of the syntactic phrase and the line break do not coincide”—bunsetsu no owari to ku no kireme ga itchi shinai (文節の終わりと句の切れ目が一致しない). It is more exact to describe the effect as suspension upon the object particle o and the consequent delay of the predicate.

Speech Act Theory

Reconsidered through Austin’s (1962) distinctions in How to Do Things with Words, the locutionary aspect—hatsuwa kōi (発話行為)—of this poem is not simply the placement of the words Su, Isuzu, Iroha, and Samuhara in succession. It is the act of voicing a 5–7–5 / 7–7 sequence and, in accordance with Japanese vocabulary and syntax, bringing su no mikoto / Isuzu no sugata / iroha uta (すの御言／五十鈴の姿／いろはうた) and daichi no ue o / tadasu Samuhara (大地の上を／正すサムハラ) into being as a single semantic chain. Within the fold between the kami-no-ku (上句) and shimo-no-ku (下句), the X-no-Y constructions of the first and second lines fold back toward daichi no ue (大地の上) in the fourth, while the third line, iroha uta (いろはうた), answers another act of utterance, Samuhara, in the fifth. The sound, form, and song of the first half overlap with the earth’s surface, its setting-right, and the incantation of the second. The locutionary content itself consequently assumes the form: the order of sound = the order of the world.

The core of the illocutionary aspect—hatsuwanai kōi (発話内行為)—is not merely to explain this chain, but to declare it, summon it, and make it operative as an act of setting-right. Although no explicit cutting word appears, an unmarked third-line break emerges after iroha uta, while the o at the end of the fourth line suspends the action until the closing phrase. Moreover, because tadasu can be heard either conclusively or attributively, daichi no ue o tadasu. Samuhara (大地の上を正す。サムハラ。) becomes an independent act of chanting, whereas daichi no ue o tadasu Samuhara (大地の上を正すサムハラ) names Samuhara as the agent that sets the earth right and closes through taigendome. Through this double possibility of cutting and continuing, the presentational force of the upper phrase changes into the declarative and invocatory force of the lower. The kakekotoba-like layering of mikoto / mikoto (御言／命・尊) and Isuzu / gojū no suzu (五十鈴／五十の鈴) also binds language, divinity, and the whole domain of sound into one, establishing the authority and range of the utterance from within the poem itself.

The anticipated perlocutionary aspect—hatsuwa baikai kōi (発話媒介行為)—is the production of a felt sense that the whole field of sound folds back into the ordering of the earth, redirecting breath, attention, and practice toward tadasu. The structural correspondence between the first and second lines and the fourth places the sacred origin and the presently manifest world within the same grammatical lattice. The correspondence between the utterances in the third and fifth lines compresses the totality of the Iroha into the single word Samuhara. From this may arise awe, inner stillness, a sense of protection, or a resolve to receive kotodama as practice rather than as abstract doctrine.

Yet in Austin’s sense, a perlocutionary effect is not a result automatically contained within the words themselves. It is the consequence actually produced in feeling, thought, or conduct. The content stating that the earth is “set right,” the illocutionary force that declares or invokes that setting-right, and the resulting stillness or turn toward practice are three overlapping layers, but they are not identical. The Samuhara left resounding at the poem’s end is therefore less the terminus of meaning than the point of voicing from which action begins.

Coda

At this point, the poem’s ending begins to sound less like a period that closes meaning than like an interval through which resonance is returned to the world. The movement of sound opened from su into Isuzu, from Isuzu into the Iroha, and from the Iroha outward across the earth is gathered into the single utterance Samuhara, yet it does not disappear there. It passes into the silence that follows: into the speaker’s breath, posture, attention, and next act. Kotodama becomes operative not only in the instant of voicing, but when its resonance remains within the body and calls forth a response to what has not yet been set right.

To “set the surface of the earth right,” then, is not to judge the world from outside or force it back into a predetermined shape. It is to listen again for relation within disorder, to return voice, breath, and body to a shared rhythm, and to open a field in which what has appeared may recover its native clarity. Samuhara is not a magical final word guaranteeing completion. It remains instead as a quiet admonition: whoever would participate in setting the world right must also consent to being set right.

The poem may end, but the sacred utterance of su does not. After-resonance is the responsibility that continues when sound has vanished, and zanshin is the posture that refuses to withdraw its listening. The coda is therefore not silence after the word, but the world listening for what the word asks us to become.

References

Asuka Jinja Sūkei Kai. (2021, May 20). 五十鈴（いすず）[Isuzu River Fifty Bells]. Retrieved December 19, 2025, from https://iesui.com/nisi/2021/05/20/五十鈴（いすず）/

Bianchini, C. T. (2023). 植芝盛平の武道論における「神」観念 [The concept of “kami” in Morihei Ueshiba’s budō theory]. 人間文化研究科年報, 38, 59–68.

Blacker, C. (2005). The catalpa bow: A study of shamanistic practices in Japan. Routledge. (Original work published 1975)

Breen, J., & Teeuwen, M. (2010). A new history of Shinto. Wiley‑Blackwell.

Brower, R. H., & Miner, E. (1961). Japanese court poetry. Stanford University Press.

De Baets, G. (2024). “Je suis pas tatamisé”: Five spectrums of variation in the narratives of 20 Aikido experts worldwide in 2020. Martial Arts Studies, 15, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.18573/mas.184

Frellesvig, B. (2010). A history of the Japanese language. Cambridge University Press.

Goldsbury, P. (2012, July 22). Touching the absolute: Aikido vs. religion and philosophy (1). Aikido Journal.

Greenhalgh, M. (2003). Aikido and spirituality: Japanese religious influences in a martial art (Master’s thesis). Durham University e-Theses. https://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4081/

Hardacre, H. (1989). Shintō and the state, 1868–1988. Princeton University Press.

Ise Jingū (Jingū Shichō). (n.d.). 皇大神宮（内宮）宇治橋（うじばし）・五十鈴川 [Kōtai Jingū (Naikū) – Ujibashi Bridge and the Isuzu River]. Retrieved October 21, 2025, from https://www.isejingu.or.jp/about/naiku/ujibashi.html

Kawamoto, K. (2000). The poetics of Japanese verse: Imagery, structure, meter (S. Collington, K. Collins, & G. Heldt, Trans.). University of Tokyo Press.

Kotobank. (n.d.). 「御言（みこと）」. In Digital Daijisen. https://kotobank.jp/word/%E5%BE%A1%E8%A8%80-637535

Kudo, R., & Shishida, F. (2010). 合気道における合気の意味: 植芝盛平とその弟子たちの言説を中心に [The meaning of aiki in Aikido: Focusing on comments made by Morihei Ueshiba and his pupils]. Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health, and Sport Sciences, 55(2), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.5432/jjpehss.09024

Ōmoto. (2025). 祭神—大天主太神（おおもとすめおおみかみ）[Enshrined Deity: Oomoto-sume-oomikami]. Retrieved December 19, 2025, from https://oomoto.or.jp/wp/saijin/

Samuhara Jinja. (n.d.). About the shrine; what “Samuhara” denotes. https://samuhara.or.jp/

Shimada, M. (2007). 古事記と言霊 [The Kojiki and Kotodama]. 言霊会 [Kotodama Kai]. (Original work published 1995)

Shirane, H. (2005). Classical Japanese: A grammar. Columbia University Press.

Staemmler, B. (2009). Chinkon kishin: Mediated spirit possession in Japanese new religions. LIT Verlag.

Stalker, N. K. (2008). Prophet motive: Deguchi Onisaburō, Ōmoto, and the rise of new religions in imperial Japan. University of Hawai‘i Press.

Stevens, J. (Ed./Comp.). (2013). The essence of Aikido: Spiritual teachings of Morihei Ueshiba (M. Ueshiba, author). Kodansha.

Takahashi, H. (1986). 武産合気 ー合気道開祖・植芝盛平先生口述 [Takemusu Aiki: The Oral Teachings of Aikido Founder, Ueshiba Morihei Sensei]. 白光真宏会出版本部 [Byakko Shinko-kai Shuppan Honbu].

Tan, K. S. Y. (2014). Becoming an aikidoka: Acculturation and essentialism in the practice of aikido. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 9(2), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.18002/rama.v9i2.1442

Ueshiba, M. (1977). 合気道奥義（道歌）(S. Abe, Ed.). 阿部, 醒石. Retrieved from  http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yp7h-td/douka.htm

University of Tokyo / OpenEdition (Galan, C.). (2013). Language textbooks following the Meiji Restoration (on the Iroha poem as ordering mnemonic). Cipango. https://journals.openedition.org/cjs/281

Vallor, M. (2016). Waka and Zen in medieval Japan. Religion Compass, 10(5), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12196

Vovin, A. (2003). A reference grammar of Classical Japanese prose. RoutledgeCurzon.

Watanabe, K. (2012). サムハラ信仰についての研究 : 怪我除けから弾丸除けへの変容 [Study of Samuhara belief : Transformation from protection against injuries to protection against bullets]. Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History, 174, 95–118. https://doi.org/10.15024/00002031

Appendix I: Change Modification Log

17 JUL 26 - Added additional poetics analysis, Speech Act analysis, translation of commentary to English, and added codas in Japanese and English.
24 JUN 26 - Updated formatting and citation style.
04 JAN 26 - Added Samuhara indexical from O'Sensei in Takahashi (1986).
20 DEC 25 - Applied Phase V styling on waka (initial test).
19 DEC 25 - Phase IV completion; commentary added.
26 NOV 25 - Phase IV preparation.
08 OCT 25 - Initial notes transferred from index page; Phase III completion.
14 APR 20 - Initial notes transferred to index page.