解説
この一首は「主の至愛（すのしあい）がひびき（共鳴）となって大宇宙を生み、その御いとなみが生れ出でたる（現れて、今まさに存続している）と宣言します。ここで至愛（しあい）は「試合（しあい）」に掛かる同音で、勝敗の“試合”を至高の愛の発露へ読み替える含みが示され、ひびきは言霊的な生成の振動を呼び起こす語として解説されます。文法面でも、ぞ … たるの焦点構文が「御いとなみ（神聖な働き）」の顕現を強く言い立て、出で＋たり（たる）が結果‐存続（現れて立っている）を表します。さらに御（み）の接頭が神的主体のはたらきを明記している――という読みが、このページの注で丁寧に敷かれています。
植芝盛平の六つのプライマーに通すと運転図はこう整います。プライマーの第一原理〈武＝宇宙原理〉—宇宙秩序の起点は主の至愛の“ひびき”である。プライマーの第二原理〈人との合気〉—“しあい”の掛詞が示すように、対人の出会い（試合）を至愛の実践へ転回する。プライマーの第三原理〈心魂一如〉—声（言）・息・身を同一拍で震わせて、ひびき＝生成を自らの技に落とす。プライマーの第四原理〈和合美化〉—“御いとなみ”が和と美へ世界を運ぶ作用である以上、技は壊すのでなく整える照明である。プライマーの第五原理〈体＝道場、心＝修業者／修行者心／学び手〉—生れ出でたるは稽古の現場で至愛の働きを実際に立ち上げ続ける呼びかけ。プライマーの第六原理〈「至愛」の源に順う〉—この“主の至愛”を最高基準（テロス）として、力の行き先を常に点検する。いずれも本ページの語釈（至愛＝倫理中核、ひびき＝言霊的共鳴、御＝神的主体）に支えられた読みです。
直前の三首とも一線でつながります。第134首が示した錬り清め（水火の変容）で器を整え、第135首が据えた真空×空のむすびで道が“知りうる”場を拓き、第136首で東天へ光を放つ御剣が顕現した――そのうえで 第137首 は、その光と生成の根（ね）が実は主の至愛の“ひびき”であり、大宇宙の御いとなみとして今ここに生まれ出て立っていると、原理を一言で総括します。言い換えれば、（第134首）清め鍛え／（第135首）むすびを悟り／（第136首）光を放ちつつ、（第137首）その全体を“至愛の共鳴”として運転せよ――これが本ページの稽古指針です。
口語要約のひとこと
「主の至愛は、その響きによって生まれた大宇宙の御いとなみこそ、生まれ出ているのだ。」
補説 響きの歌法――無助詞の掛け渡し・生成の反復・連体形の余韻
既出の「至愛／試合」の掛詞と「ぞ……たる」の係り結びに加えて、この一首では、まず音数律そのものが訓みを選別する装置として働いています。「主」を「す」、「御」を「おん」と読めば、す・の・しあい＝五、ひびき・うまれし＝七、だい・うちゅう＝五、おん・いとなみ・ぞ＝七、うまれ・いで・たる＝七となり、全体は過不足のない五七五七七に収まります。「主」は「しゅ」でも一音なので定型上は成立しますが、本歌の言霊的宇宙論と表題を踏まえれば「す」が第一訓となり、「ぬし」は六音となるため韻律上は後退します。同様に、「御」を「み」と読めば第四句は六音の字足らずとなるのに対し、「おん」なら七音を満たします。したがって、「み」は神語的含意を照らす副次的な訓みとして保ちうるものの、定型に即した朗誦では「おん」が強く支持されます。逆にいえば、「おんいとなみぞ」と読めば、伝本に「の」を補わずとも第四句の音数は満ちるため、「大宇宙の／御いとなみぞ」と散文化する補入は、韻律上必須ではありません。
第二に、平仮名で置かれた「ひびき」には、名詞「響き」と動詞「響く」の連用形「響き」とが同時に潜んでいます。名詞として読めば、「主の至愛［の］ひびき［より］生れし大宇宙」――すなわち「至愛の響きから生まれた大宇宙」となります。一方、動詞の連用形として読めば、「主の至愛［が］ひびき、生れし大宇宙」――「主の至愛が響き、その響くさなかに大宇宙が生まれた」となります。これは通常の同音異義による掛詞というより、名詞と連用形が同じ音形を取ることによって成立する、品詞的・統語的な「掛け」です。助詞「が」「の」「より」や接続助詞を明示しない省略法によって、響きが生成の原因である読みと、至愛そのものが響く運動である読みとが、ひとつの「ひびき」の内部に重ねられています。動詞としての読みでは連用中止法も働き、至愛が響く動作から宇宙が生まれる出来事へ、切断を置かずに運動が流れ込みます。
第一・第二句「主の至愛／ひびき生れし」は、核心語「大宇宙」の出現を第三句まで遅らせる点で、厳密な序詞ではないものの、序詞的な遅延効果を帯びています。しかも第三句「大宇宙」は、前方へは「ひびき生れし」によって修飾される被修飾語であり、後方へは「御いとなみぞ」に対する所属・同格の名詞として働きます。すなわち、「ひびき生れし〈大宇宙〉」と「〈大宇宙〉［の］御いとなみぞ」とが、同じ第三句を両側から共有しています。この両属的な統辞によって、「大宇宙」は上句の到達点であると同時に、下句の出発点となります。
したがって第三句には、体言「大宇宙」で一度呼吸を止める中間体言止めと、意味上の三句切れに近い強い折れが生じます。しかし、その切れは完全な断絶ではありません。「大宇宙」と「御いとなみぞ」が無助詞で接するため、切れた直後に再び下句へ跨ぎ直されます。ここには、切れながら続き、止まりながら展開する「切れ―継ぎ」の構造があります。「の」を補えば散文上の関係は明瞭になりますが、その代わりに「大宇宙」が前後二つの句へ同時に掛かる蝶番としての働きは弱まります。伝本の無助詞接続は、単なる脱落としてではなく、上句と下句を折り畳むための詩的圧縮として読む余地があります。
また、「生れし」と「生れ出でたる」という同根語の隔句反復が、歌の主題である「ひびき」を形式そのものによって実演しています。第二句で一度発せられた「生れ」が、第五句でもう一度反響するため、意味として語られた響きが、語の再来として実際に響き返します。これは反復法であると同時に、内容と形式が重なる音義相即の構えです。第一・第二句に「至愛」「ひびき」「生れし」とイ音が繰り返されることも、厳密な脚韻ではないものの、上句に細かな内部韻を生み、「ひびき」という語を音響的に支えています。
ただし、二度の「生れ」は単純な重複ではありません。第一の「生れし」は過去の助動詞「き」の連体形によって、大宇宙が生じた根源的な出来事を遠景として捉えます。それに対して終句の「生れ出でたる」は、「生れる」にさらに「出づ」を重ね、内に成ったものが外へ現れ出る運動を強めたうえで、完了・結果存続の「たり」に結びます。ここには、〈生起〉から〈顕現〉へ、〈宇宙が生まれること〉から〈その御いとなみが現前し続けること〉へ進む漸層法があります。「生れし」が創成の起点を示し、「生れ出でたる」がその創成の現在的持続を示すため、両者の差は時制と相による遠近法ともなっています。
さらに、本歌は他動詞「生む」によって外部の主体が宇宙を製作するとは言わず、自動詞的な「生る／生れ出づ」を重ねています。主の至愛は機械的な製作者として宇宙を外から作るのではなく、響きとなり、その響きの内から大宇宙と御いとなみとが自ずから生れ出ます。この自生的な構文は、「主」を西洋的な造物主へ固定せず、至愛・ひびき・宇宙・いとなみが一続きの産霊として展開する読みを支えます。「生れ―大宇宙―いとなみ―出づ」は、厳密な古典的縁語の定型をなすというより、生成・活動・顕現をめぐる広義の縁語的連鎖を作っています。
見立ての面では、目に見えない「至愛」がまず「ひびき」という音響的現象に見立てられ、さらに大宇宙とその御いとなみが「生れる」生命現象として見立てられています。抽象的な愛が響き、響きが宇宙となり、宇宙の働きが産声を上げて現れる――という二重の見立てです。至愛に「響く」「生れる」という生命的運動を担わせる点では擬人法も働きますが、その効果は人物化よりも、至愛そのものを生きた生成力として表すことにあります。主題は静止した理念ではなく、響きながら形を取り続ける働きへ移されています。
語彙配置にも漸層があります。「主」の根源性、「至」の極点性、「大」の宇宙的広がり、「御」の神聖な尊貴が、第一句から第四句へ段階的に積み重ねられます。しかも、漢字三字だけで組まれた第三句「大宇宙」は、仮名の多い第二句と第四句の間に置かれ、表記上も密度の高い核となっています。五音を三字へ凝縮した「大宇宙」が視覚的な中心を占め、その前後を「ひびき」「いとなみ」「生れ出でたる」という和語の運動が流れるため、宇宙という凝縮した中心から生成の波が両側へ広がるような表記上の構図も生じています。
終句「生れ出でたる」は、文法上は「ぞ」を受ける係り結びとして完結していますが、聴覚上はなお後続する体言を待つ連体形です。通常の終止形「たり」で断定せず、「たる」で閉じることにより、「生れ出でたるもの」「生れ出でたること」「生れ出でたる御いとなみ」といった未発の名詞が余白に残ります。この連体形止めは、御いとなみを一回限りの過去へ封じず、なお何かを生み、なお何かへ連なろうとする余韻を作ります。歌が終わった後にも「ひびき」が止まらず、朗誦する声、稽古する身、現前する宇宙へ続きを求める――そこに「たる」の結果存続と、和歌的な余韻とが重なっています。
なお、この一首に固定的な枕詞、固有の地名による歌枕、あるいは特定の古歌を踏まえた本歌取りを認定する積極的な根拠は薄いと考えられます。ここで中心となるのは定型句の引用ではなく、訓みを選ぶ音数律、名詞と連用形を重ねる「ひびき」、助詞を省いて第三句を前後へ掛け渡す統辞、生成語の反復、そして連体形のまま閉じる余韻です。すなわち、この道歌は「響きによって宇宙が生まれる」と説明するだけでなく、語を省き、折り、繰り返し、終止を開いたままにすることによって、響きから生成が続く形式そのものを作っています。
発話行為理論
オースティン（Austin, 1962）の三層に通すと、この一首の発話行為（locutionary）は、単なる意味内容ではなく、音・語・文法の実演である。第一・第二句「主の至愛／ひびき生れし」は第四句「御いとなみぞ」へ折り返され、第三句「大宇宙」は第五句「生れ出でたる」へ折り返される。上句と下句の折り目は中句「大宇宙」にあり、響きが宇宙となり、宇宙が顕現として立つ二重の畳み返しを作る。つまり、この道歌の発話行為は「至愛が響いて宇宙を生んだ」という説明であると同時に、響きそのものを声のうちに起こす言霊的な運転である。
発話内行為（illocutionary）では、道歌は宇宙論の説明にとどまらず、合気の場を至愛の言霊として再命名する宣言となる。切れ字的な「ぞ」は第四句を照らし、「御いとなみ」を焦点化しながら終句「たる」に結び、神聖な働きの現前を強く言い立てる。掛詞の「至愛／試合」は、勝敗の試合を至愛の発露へ読み替え、武の発話内力を対立から生成へ転回させる。ここで道歌は、宇宙の仕組を述べるだけでなく、稽古の意味を言い換え、試合の響きを至愛の響きへ戻す。
発話媒介行為（perlocutionary）では、期待される作用は知識の追加よりも身魂の調律である。声に出される「ひびき」は、意味としての響きと音声としての響きを重ね、稽古の呼吸・間合い・触れ合いを「主の至愛」の運転へ帰す。ここで「生れ出でたる」は過去の創世譚ではなく、今ここで立ち上がり続ける御いとなみの証しとなり、清め・むすび・光・至愛を一線につなぐ稽古指針として働く。
コーダ
この一首が最後に置くのは、遠い過去の宇宙創成についての説明ではない。「主の至愛」は世界の外から大宇宙を製作する力として語られず、自ら「ひびき」となり、その響きの内から大宇宙と御いとなみとを生れ出させる。至愛・響き・宇宙・営みは、原因と結果として切り離されるのではなく、一つの産霊が内から外へ現れ続ける相として重ねられている。したがって「生れ出でたる」は、かつて起こった出来事の報告ではなく、その生成が今なお現前しているという宣言である。
第三句「大宇宙」は、その宣言の折り目となる。上句では「ひびき生れし」ものとして受け取られ、下句では「御いとなみぞ」の根拠として開き直される。ここで歌は一度「大宇宙」に止まりながら、無助詞のまま再び流れ始める。切れて、継がれ、折り畳まれて、また開く。この運動は、相手との接触において形を固定せず、呼吸・間合い・力の行き先を絶えず結び直す合気の稽古そのものにも通じる。
ゆえに「至愛／試合」の掛けは、試合や対人の出会いを消去するのではない。同じ「しあい」という響きの行き先を、勝敗から生成へ、制圧から和合美化へ、相手を壊す力から世界を整える御いとなみへと転回する。稽古者がなすべきことは、至愛を理念として掲げることではなく、声・息・身を一つの拍に調え、接触のただ中でその響きが生れ出る余地をつくることである。技は御いとなみの代わりに世界を支配するのではなく、その働きが今ここに現れるための器となる。
そして終句の「たる」は、歌を閉じながら閉じ切らない。なお続く体言を待つその連体形は、「生れ出でたるもの」が何であるかを、朗誦する声と稽古する身体へ委ねている。第134首の清め、第135首のむすび、第136首の光は、ここで「主の至愛」の響きとして一つに結ばれる。しかし、その結びは終点ではない。道歌が終わった後、次に生れ出る御いとなみは、相手と触れ、息を合わせ、力の行き先を選ぶ、この一回の稽古において確かめられなければならない。歌を読むとは、その響きを理解することだけではなく、自らがその続きとなることである。
English Translation
Commentary
This poem declares that Su’s Supreme Love, Su no shiai (主の至愛), becomes hibiki (ひびき)—resonance—giving birth to the Great Universe, and that its august working, on itonami (御いとなみ), has “come forth,” umare idetaru (生れ出でたる): it has appeared and remains present even now. Here, shiai (至愛), “Supreme Love,” is homophonically superimposed upon shiai (試合), “match” or “contest.” The implication is that the contest of victory and defeat may be reread as an expression of the highest love. Hibiki (ひびき), meanwhile, is explained as a word that evokes the generative vibration of kotodama (言霊). Grammatically, the focused construction zo … taru (ぞ……たる) strongly asserts the manifestation of the “august working,” on itonami (御いとなみ), while ide + tari, in its form taru (出で＋たり〔たる〕), expresses a resultant state that continues: something has appeared and now stands manifest. The honorific prefix mi (御), understood semantically, also explicitly marks the working as that of a divine subject. This is the reading carefully established by the notes on this page.
Passed through Ueshiba Morihei’s Six Primers, the poem’s operating diagram takes the following form. Primer One, Bu = Uchū Genri (武＝宇宙原理), “Bu = Cosmic Principle”: the point of origin of cosmic order is the resonance of Su’s Supreme Love. Primer Two, Hito to no Aiki (人との合気), “Aiki with Another/Others”: as the pivot between the two forms of shiai (至愛／試合) indicates, an interpersonal encounter—a contest—is turned toward the practice of Supreme Love. Primer Three, Shinkon Ichinyo (心魂一如), “Heart-mind and Spirit, Inseparable”: voice or word, breath, and body are made to vibrate in a single beat, embodying hibiki as generation within technique. Primer Four, Wagō Bika (和合美化), “Harmonization and Beautification”: insofar as the august working carries the world toward harmony and beauty, technique is an illumination that orders rather than destroys. Primer Five, Karada/Tai = Dōjō, Kokoro = Shugyōsha / Shugyōsha / Manabite (体＝道場、心＝修業者／修行者／学び手), “Body = Dōjō; Heart-mind = Practitioner / Ascetic / Learner”: umare idetaru (生れ出でたる) becomes an invocation to keep bringing the working of Supreme Love into actual presence within the place of practice. Primer Six, “Shiai” no Minamoto ni Shitagau (「至愛」の源に順う), “Follow the Source of Supreme Love”: Su’s Supreme Love is taken as the highest criterion—the telos—against which the destination of force is continually examined. Each of these readings is supported by the glosses established on this page: Supreme Love as the ethical core, hibiki as kotodama-like resonance, and the prefix mi (御) as the mark of divine agency.
The poem is joined to the preceding three dōka along a single line. Dōka 134 prepared the vessel through refining purification—the transformation of water and fire. Dōka 135 established the musubi of vacuum and emptiness, shinkū × kū no musubi (真空×空のむすび), opening a field in which the way could become “knowable.” In Dōka 136, the august sword casting light into the eastern heavens appeared. Against that sequence, Dōka 137 summarizes the underlying principle in a single utterance: the light and the root, ne (根), of generation are in truth the resonance of Su’s Supreme Love, now coming forth and standing present as the august working of the Great Universe. Put differently: in Dōka 134, purify and temper; in Dōka 135, realize musubi; in Dōka 136, cast forth light; and in Dōka 137, operate the whole as the “resonance of Supreme Love.” This is the guide for practice offered by the present page.
A one-sentence colloquial summary
“Su’s Supreme Love: it is precisely the august working of the Great Universe, born through that resonance, that is now coming forth.”
Supplement: The poetics of resonance: particleless bridging, repeated generation, and the lingering resonance of the attributive Form
In addition to the already noted pivot between shiai (至愛), “Supreme Love,” and shiai (試合), “contest,” and the binding construction zo … taru (ぞ……たる), the moraic meter itself functions in this poem as an instrument for selecting among possible readings. Reading “Su” as su (主) and “august” as on (御) yields:
su no shiai (主の至愛) — five
hibiki umareshi (ひびき生れし) — seven
dai uchū (大宇宙) — five
on itonami zo (御いとなみぞ) — seven
umare ide taru (生れ出でたる) — seven
The whole thus settles without excess or deficiency into the classical 5–7–5–7–7 form. The graph Su (主) could also be read shu, likewise a single mora, and so remains metrically possible. Yet in light of the poem’s kotodama-based cosmology and the title of the page, su is the primary reading. Nushi (主), by contrast, would make the first line six morae and therefore recedes on metrical grounds. Similarly, reading the honorific graph as mi (御) would leave the fourth line one mora short, at six, whereas on (御) completes the required seven. The reading mi may therefore be retained as a secondary reading that illuminates the word’s sacred implications, but on is strongly supported in recitation governed by the fixed form. Conversely, once the line is read on itonami zo (御いとなみぞ), its seven morae are complete without supplying an additional particle no (の) to the transmitted text. The prose-like supplementation dai uchū no / on itonami zo (大宇宙の／御いとなみぞ), “the Great Universe’s august working,” is therefore not metrically necessary.
Second, the word hibiki (ひびき), written in hiragana, simultaneously shelters the noun “resonance” and the continuative form of the verb hibiku (響く), “to resound.” Read as a noun, the syntax becomes:
su no shiai [no] hibiki [yori] umareshi dai uchū
(主の至愛［の］ひびき［より］生れし大宇宙)“the Great Universe born from the resonance of Su’s Supreme Love.”
Read as the continuative form of a verb, however, it becomes:
su no shiai [ga] hibiki, umareshi dai uchū
(主の至愛［が］ひびき、生れし大宇宙)“Su’s Supreme Love resounded, and while it resounded the Great Universe was born.”
This is less an ordinary kakekotoba founded upon two homophonous words of different meanings than a part-of-speech and syntactic “hinging,” a kake (掛け), made possible because the noun and the continuative verbal form possess the same sound-shape. Through the omission of such particles as ga (が), no (の), and yori (より), as well as any explicit conjunctive particle, two readings are superimposed within a single hibiki: resonance as the cause of generation, and Supreme Love itself as the movement that resounds. Under the verbal reading, the technique of continuative suspension, ren’yō chūshihō (連用中止法), is also active. The movement of Supreme Love resounding flows directly into the event of the universe’s birth without an intervening break.
The first two lines, su no shiai / hibiki umareshi (主の至愛／ひびき生れし), postpone the arrival of the central term dai uchū (大宇宙), “Great Universe,” until the third line. They are not a formal jokotoba (序詞), or prefatory phrase, in the strict sense, yet they acquire a prefatory effect of delay. The third line dai uchū (大宇宙), moreover, belongs simultaneously to what precedes and what follows. Looking backward, it is the noun modified by hibiki umareshi (ひびき生れし): hibiki umareshi [dai uchū] (ひびき生れし〈大宇宙〉), “the Great Universe born through resonance.” Looking forward, it functions as a possessive or appositional noun in relation to on itonami zo (御いとなみぞ): [dai uchū] [no] on itonami zo (〈大宇宙〉［の］御いとなみぞ), “the Great Universe—its august working indeed.” Through this bidirectional syntax, the Great Universe becomes at once the destination of the upper verse, the kami-no-ku (上句), and the point of departure of the lower verse, the shimo-no-ku (下句).
The third line consequently produces a medial taigendome (体言止め), a momentary suspension upon the noun dai uchū (大宇宙), together with a strong semantic turn approaching a three-line break, or sanku-gire (三句切れ). Yet the break is not a complete severance. Because dai uchū (大宇宙) and on itonami zo (御いとなみぞ) meet without an intervening particle, the poem crosses once more into the lower verse immediately after the pause. The result is a structure of “cutting and rejoining,” kire–tsugi (切れ―継ぎ): it continues by cutting and unfolds by stopping. Supplying no (の) would clarify the prose relation, but it would also weaken the work of dai uchū (大宇宙) as a hinge simultaneously attached to the lines before and after it. The particleless connection preserved in the transmitted text may therefore be read not merely as an omission, but as poetic compression that folds the upper and lower verses into one another.
The recurrence of the same generative root in umareshi (生れし), “was born,” and umare idetaru (生れ出でたる), “has come forth,” formally enacts the very hibiki that the poem names. The word umare (生れ), first sounded in the second line, echoes back in the fifth. Resonance, which had been stated as the poem’s meaning, thus actually resounds through the return of the word itself. This is both verbal repetition and a coincidence of sound and sense, in which content and form occupy the same configuration. The recurrence of the i sound throughout shiai (至愛), hibiki (ひびき), and umareshi (生れし) in the first two lines also produces a fine internal resonance. It is not strict end rhyme, but it acoustically supports the word hibiki within the upper verse.
The two occurrences of “birth,” however, are not simple duplication. The first, umareshi (生れし), employs the attributive form shi (し) of the past auxiliary ki (き), presenting the primordial event in which the Great Universe arose as something viewed in the distance. The final umare idetaru (生れ出でたる), by contrast, adds izu (出づ), “to come forth,” to the act of being born, intensifying the motion by which something formed within emerges outwardly. It then binds that motion to the perfect and resultative-continuative auxiliary tari, here appearing as taru (たり／たる). The poem thus develops through a rhetorical gradation: from arising to manifestation, and from the universe’s birth to the continued present manifestation of its august working. Umareshi (生れし) marks the point of cosmic inception, whereas umare idetaru (生れ出でたる) marks the present endurance of that inception. Their distinction creates a temporal and aspectual perspective of depth.
The poem also avoids saying that an external subject “made” the universe through the transitive verb umu (生む). Instead, it repeats the intransitive movement of umaru / umare-izu (生る／生れ出づ), “to be born / to come forth.” Su’s Supreme Love does not manufacture the universe from outside as a mechanical creator. It becomes resonance, and from within that resonance the Great Universe and its august working arise of themselves. This self-generating syntax supports a reading that does not fix Su (主) as a Western-style Creator standing apart from creation. Supreme Love, resonance, universe, and working instead unfold as a single continuous musubi (産霊), a generative binding and becoming. The sequence umare—dai uchū—itonami—izu (生れ―大宇宙―いとなみ―出づ), “birth—Great Universe—working—coming forth,” is not a fixed classical set of engo (縁語), yet it forms a broad associative chain organized around generation, activity, and manifestation.
At the level of mitate (見立て), or poetic figuration, the invisible reality of Supreme Love is first figured as the acoustic phenomenon of hibiki (ひびき). The Great Universe and its august working are then figured as living phenomena that are “born.” Abstract love resounds; resonance becomes a universe; and the working of the universe emerges as though raising its first cry. This is a double mitate. Personification, gijinhō (擬人法), is also present insofar as Supreme Love is made to “resound” and “be born,” yet its effect is less to turn Supreme Love into a human figure than to express it as a living generative power. The poem’s subject thereby shifts from a static idea to a working that continues to take form while resounding.
A further gradation is present in the arrangement of the vocabulary itself. The rootward force of Su (主), the extremity expressed by shi (至), the cosmic expanse of dai (大), and the sacred dignity of on/mi (御) accumulate progressively from the first through the fourth lines. The third line, dai uchū (大宇宙), is composed entirely of three kanji and is placed between the kana-rich second and fourth lines. It therefore becomes a visually dense nucleus. Five morae are compressed into the three characters of dai uchū (大宇宙), which occupies the poem’s graphic center, while the movement of native Japanese words—hibiki (ひびき), itonami (いとなみ), and umare idetaru (生れ出でたる)—flows around it. The orthographic composition itself consequently suggests waves of generation spreading in both directions from the condensed center of the universe.
The final line, umare idetaru (生れ出でたる), is grammatically complete as the concluding member of the zo … taru (ぞ……たる) binding. Acoustically, however, taru (たる) remains an attributive form that appears to await a noun still to come. Rather than closing with the finite assertion tari (たり), the poem ends with taru (たる), leaving several unspoken nouns in the surrounding space:
umare idetaru mono
(生れ出でたるもの),
“that which has come forth”
umare idetaru koto
(生れ出でたること),
“the event of coming forth”
umare idetaru on itonami
(生れ出でたる御いとなみ),
“the august working that has come forth”
This attributive-form closure, rentaikei-dome (連体形止め), prevents the august working from being sealed within a single completed event of the past. It creates a lingering resonance in which the working is still producing something and still reaching toward what follows. Even after the poem has ended, its hibiki does not cease. It seeks continuation in the reciting voice, the practicing body, and the universe standing present. Here, the resultative persistence expressed by taru and the poetic afterresonance of yoin (余韻) coincide.
There is, however, little positive basis for identifying a fixed makurakotoba (枕詞), a place-name functioning as an utamakura (歌枕), or a deliberate honkadori (本歌取り) from a particular earlier poem. The poem’s central techniques are not the quotation of inherited formulae, but meter that selects its own readings; the superimposition of noun and continuative verb within hibiki (ひびき); particleless syntax that bridges the third line both backward and forward; the repetition of generative vocabulary; and an ending that remains open in the attributive form. In other words, this dōka does not merely explain that “the universe is born through resonance.” By omitting, folding, repeating, and leaving its grammatical closure open, it creates the very form through which generation continues out of resonance.
Speech Act Theory
Under the three levels proposed by Austin (1962), the poem’s locutionary act is not merely the communication of semantic content; it is an enactment performed through sound, wording, and grammar. The first two lines, su no shiai / hibiki umareshi (主の至愛／ひびき生れし), fold back into the fourth, on itonami zo (御いとなみぞ), while the third line, dai uchū (大宇宙), folds back into the fifth, umare idetaru (生れ出でたる). The fold between the kami-no-ku and shimo-no-ku lies in the middle line dai uchū (大宇宙), producing a double refolding in which resonance becomes universe and universe stands forth as manifestation. The locutionary act of the dōka is therefore at once an explanation—“Supreme Love resounded and gave birth to the universe”—and a kotodama-like operation that causes resonance itself to arise within the voice.
At the level of the illocutionary act, the dōka does not remain a description of cosmology. It becomes a declaration that renames the field of aiki as the kotodama of Supreme Love. The kireji-like particle zo (ぞ) illuminates the fourth line, bringing on itonami (御いとなみ), “the august working,” into focus, while binding it to the final taru (たる) and forcefully asserting the present manifestation of divine activity. The pivot shiai / shiai (至愛／試合) rereads a contest of victory and defeat as the manifestation of Supreme Love, turning the illocutionary force of bu away from opposition and toward generation. The dōka thus does more than state the mechanism of the universe. It rewords the meaning of practice, returning the sound of shiai as contest to the resonance of shiai as Supreme Love.
At the level of the perlocutionary act, the anticipated effect is not principally the addition of knowledge, but the attunement of body and spirit. When spoken aloud, hibiki (ひびき) superimposes resonance as meaning upon resonance as audible sound, returning the breath, maai (間合い), and contact of practice to the operation of Su’s Supreme Love. Here, umare idetaru (生れ出でたる) is not a cosmogonic account confined to the past. It becomes evidence of an august working that continues to arise here and now. In this way, the poem functions as a guide for practice, joining purification, musubi, light, and Supreme Love along a single unbroken line.
Coda
What this poem finally places before us is not merely an explanation of cosmic creation in a remote past. Su’s Supreme Love is not presented as a power standing outside the world and manufacturing the Great Universe. It becomes hibiki (ひびき), “resonance,” and from within that resonance the Great Universe and its august working come forth. Supreme Love, resonance, universe, and working are therefore not separated into a mechanical sequence of cause and effect. They are superimposed as phases of a single musubi (産霊), a generative binding that continually moves from the concealed into manifestation. Umare idetaru (生れ出でたる) is consequently not a report of something completed long ago, but a declaration that this generation still stands present now.
The third line, dai uchū (大宇宙), “Great Universe,” forms the fold of that declaration. Within the upper verse, it is received as that which was born through resonance; within the lower verse, it opens again as the ground of on itonami zo (御いとなみぞ), “the august working indeed.” The poem pauses upon the Great Universe and then, without an intervening particle, begins to move once more. It cuts, rejoins, folds, and unfolds. That movement also bears upon the practice of aiki: within contact with another, form is not to be frozen, but breath, maai (間合い), and the destination of force are continually joined anew.
The pivot shiai / shiai (至愛／試合) therefore does not abolish the match, contest, or interpersonal encounter. It redirects the destination of their shared sound—from victory and defeat toward generation, from domination toward harmonization and beautification, and from force that damages another toward the august working that orders the world. The practitioner’s task is not simply to profess Supreme Love as an ideal. It is to tune voice, breath, and body to one beat and, within the immediacy of contact, make room for that resonance to be born. Technique does not rule the world in place of the august working; it becomes the vessel through which that working may appear here and now.
The final taru (たる) closes the poem without closing it completely. As an attributive form still seeming to await a noun, it entrusts the identity of “that which has come forth” to the reciting voice and the practicing body. The purification of Dōka 134, the musubi of Dōka 135, and the light of Dōka 136 are gathered here into the resonance of Su’s Supreme Love. Yet this gathering is not an endpoint. After the poem has ceased, the next on itonami (御いとなみ) must be verified within this particular practice: in touching another, joining breath, and choosing where force will go. To read the dōka is therefore not only to understand its resonance. It is to become what that resonance brings forth next.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bocking, B. (1997). A popular dictionary of Shinto. Routledge.
Brower, R. H., & Miner, E. R. (1961). Japanese court poetry. Stanford University Press.
DIGITALIO. (n.d.-a). 主. In Kotobank. Retrieved October 18, 2025, from https://kotobank.jp/word/主-76657
DIGITALIO. (n.d.-b). 営み. In Kotobank.
Electronic Dictionary Research and Development Group [EDRDG]. (n.d.). 主. In WWWJDIC. Retrieved October 18, 2025, from https://www.edrdg.org/cgi-bin/wwwjdic/wwwjdic?1MDJ%BC%E7
Greenhalgh, M. (2003). Aikido and spirituality: Japanese religious influences in a martial art (Master’s thesis). Durham University e-Theses. https://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4081/
Hardacre, H. (2017). Shinto: A history. Oxford University Press.
Kubozono, H. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology. De Gruyter Mouton.
Kokugakuin University. (n.d.). Mikoto. Encyclopedia of Shintō (EOS).
Muller, C. (2014). 主. In Digital Dictionary of Buddhism. Retrieved October 18, 2025, from http://www.buddhism-dict.net/cgi-bin/xpr-ddb.pl?q=主
National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics [NINJAL]. (2017). 日本語歴史コーパス 短単位規程集 Ver.1.0（鎌倉時代編）. https://clrd.ninjal.ac.jp/chj/doc/morph_kamakura_v1_0.pdf
Shirane, H. (2005). Classical Japanese: A grammar. Columbia University Press.
Stalker, N. K. (2008). Prophet motive: Deguchi Onisaburō, Ōmoto, and the rise of new religions in imperial Japan. University of Hawai‘i Press.
Ueshiba, M. (1977). 合気道奥義（道歌）(S. Abe, Ed.). 阿部, 醒石. Retrieved from http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yp7h-td/douka.htm
Wikimedia Foundation. (2025, October 14). 主. In Wiktionary. Retrieved October 18, 2025, from https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E4%B8%BB&oldid=87443752.
Appendix I: Change Modification Log
23 AUG 26 - Updated formatting; added additional poetics analysis; added translation of commentary to English; added codas to Japanese and English commentaries.01 JUN 26 - Added Speech Act Analysis; updated citation style.21 DEC 25 - Phase V styling applied to waka.28 NOV 25 - Phase IV completion; commentary added.23 NOV 25 - Phase IV preparation.18 OCT 25 - Phase III completed; introduced kōgo translation (Phase IV beta).14 APR 20 - Initial notes transferred.